I've been advocating for NOtice To Aircrew Members, to no avail.and I'll bet every one of us think "Notice to Airmen" whenever we read the term NOTAM....
I've been advocating for NOtice To Aircrew Members, to no avail.and I'll bet every one of us think "Notice to Airmen" whenever we read the term NOTAM....
Reminds me of the persistent use of "individual" to refer to a person. I always want to ask "individual WHAT? Individual dog, individual chimpanzee, individual fish, WHAT?"Oh well I can see the point on that one.
Important to have a distinction between People Leader, and all the other ones in your company like the Insect Leaders, Dandelion Leaders, Hummingbird Leaders, Cloven-Hooved Ungulate Leaders.. etc
I'm actually curious about this myself. I have adapted to the change but I have zero clue what prompted it, nor understand how it is better. I assume I'm not part of the aggrieved class this aims to relieve.
Just curious: Are you aware of any plans to remove the 29 references to "student" from the AIM? (Note: This is NOT a suggestion!)Would the world have ended had the change not been made? Of course not. But apparently as publications go up for revision, the writers attempt to update language as necessary. I don't think the intention was "woke" so much as the authors identified a point of potential confusion referring to people who did not hold a student pilot certificate as students. It just so happened that 3 1/2 years ago, when this change was made, "a lot of things were going on." Apparently the whole "learner" thing didn't get tagged as "woke" until people rediscovered it nearly a year later under the new administration (along with some other eye rolling efforts to get rid of the term airman and NOTAM). I guess I'll also mention this was an industry thing; not a unilateral change by a few select FAA authors.
Oh well I can see the point on that one.
Important to have a distinction between People Leader, and all the other ones in your company like the Insect Leaders, Dandelion Leaders, Hummingbird Leaders, Cloven-Hooved Ungulate Leaders.. etc
Rather than invent a new civil term "air mission", I wish FAA administrator Steve Dickson would have just turned NOTAM from an acronym to a simple word "notam", defined as notifications that people operating airplanes need to know about. Kinda like the word "radar", which hasn't been an acronym for decades.
Well ... there are 19 on this page:Just curious: Are you aware of any plans to remove the 29 references to "student" from the AIM? (Note: This it NOT a suggestion!)
I’ll expand on my nope.Hmmmm....I think that we are all lifetime learners. The Student Pilot moniker expires when you pass the checkride, correct?
I am a 9000 hour student pilot with an ATP certification.
Man. I’ll never make it to a triple. I’m too old and junior to see that gig. I’m forever domestic narrow body student pilot trash. It’s ok though. I take pride in actually working for my money. Those international guys just ride around taking turn sleeping. /s
But it must be a hoot in the TRACON when a 777 pilot finishes reading back a clearance with the phrase "Student pilot."
.... just turned NOTAM from an acronym to a simple word "notam"....
Thanks to the CAF, I have become what I consider to be a student of WW 2 history, but I never studied it in school. One of the definitions of "student" is "one who studies."I’ll expand on my nope.
Student pilot just happens to be a certification. I however consider myself to be a permanent student pilot. I’ve never and don’t think I will ever move past the student status. No matter how much I study or experience I’m always a student of the craft and art of being an aviator.
I don’t want anyone to take that away from me. Student is not derogatory or inappropriate in describing what I am. I am a 9000 hour student pilot with an ATP certification.
If you want to be called a learner that’s fine.
Personally I don’t need or want that validation. Being a permanent student has served me well.
To each their own. Our opinions are equally valid. Just please don’t call me a learner.
Shakespeare did it:...a trend of turning nouns into verbs...
I cringe every time I hear......."frankly".........there is NEVER anything "frank" about the next words.instead of wasting time changing "student" to "learner", I'd love to see people stop torturing the English language... stop using "could care less" when you mean "couldn't care less", stop using "methodology" when you mean "method" (wouldn't "methodology" be the study of methods?)... etc etc etc.
I feel like it was more of a slower evolution and not so much a forced feeding....I wonder if the prior 250 years of change was as forced-feeling to the population back then, as the current language modification feels to me today.
That's funny, I literally said exactly the same thing to a couple pilots last week when we were joking about this.Rather than invent a new civil term "air mission", I wish FAA administrator Steve Dickson would have just turned NOTAM from an acronym to a simple word "notam", defined as notifications that people operating airplanes need to know about. Kinda like the word "radar", which hasn't been an acronym for decades.
Uh…civil rights movement? The Civil war? I’m pretty sure those on the wrong side of history in those examples would say they were “force fed” that era’s equivalent of “woke”.I feel like it was more of a slower evolution and not so much a forced feeding....
And as far as I know, Congress has not empowered the FAA to act as the arbiter of correct use of the English language.Been a CFI over 20 years, I am not using the term learner. I actually feel bad for the ones that do use the term. Just as I will still call it a BFR. It amuses me even more when someone uses the term BFR and some FAA fanboy chimes in and tries to correct them that is is no longer called BFR.
I know a few people who still use the word "broad" to refer to a woman. I'm sure they're offended that the rest of us find the term less appropriate than they do.wonder if the prior 250 years of change was as forced-feeling to the population back then, as the current language modification feels to me today.
I have never seen a sign that said "Study to fly here". For as long as I've been in aviation, it has been "Learn to fly here". The justification in the AOPA article is complete nonsense, but for me "student" always had a bit more of an academical connotation. Used to be that you would not even be called a student (usually) until you got to college, although that seems to have changed lately.What is the ideology of "Student" --> "Learner"?
Maybe. But I'm not convinced.You might be studying for the instrument written test, but you're still learning how to fly using instruments. At the end of the day, it's only weird because it's a sudden language change. Had it been more of a gradual transition, none of us would probably notice.
All pilots are studs, by definitionWell, you see, it contains the word "stud" and that's offensive to pilots who aren't studs.
Can you define "woke" for us?
I have no problem saying “flight review” vs BFR. It uses the words that remind you that review is required rather than a slightly awkward acronym. It also isn’t really re-defining anything.Been a CFI over 20 years, I am not using the term learner. I actually feel bad for the ones that do use the term. Just as I will still call it a BFR. It amuses me even more when someone uses the term BFR and some FAA fanboy chimes in and tries to correct them that is is no longer called BFR.
I will agree with you that learner, especially standalone, sounds forced/convoluted.Learner has almost always been used as a second word in a phrase as "Slow-learner," "visual-learner," "fast-learner," "quick learner."
How do you know what they mean? Maybe they could care less, but chose not to.instead of wasting time changing "student" to "learner", I'd love to see people stop torturing the English language... stop using "could care less" when you mean "couldn't care less", stop using "methodology" when you mean "method" (wouldn't "methodology" be the study of methods?)... etc etc etc.
But they miss the other long-established use of the word student. I study the weather every single day for my photography job, and I hope to "learn" from that study. I'm a student of the weather, and there's nothing demeaning about that, and there's nothing demeaning about an airline pilot studying things, either.I suspect this is a bow to the oppressor/oppressed paradigm that undergirds everything in America today. “Student” implies “teacher,” and a “student/teacher relationship,” which is inherently hierarchical and therefore evil. “Learner” is much softer. We’re all learning, you know. — just trying to find our way in this mean, old world. No hierarchy implied.
Just a guess. . .But whenever you ask “why are we changing this innocuous word?” the answer might be found looking through the Critical Theory lens.
meth·od·ol·o·gyinstead of wasting time changing "student" to "learner", I'd love to see people stop torturing the English language... stop using "could care less" when you mean "couldn't care less", stop using "methodology" when you mean "method" (wouldn't "methodology" be the study of methods?)... etc etc etc.
And what I see, at least in the nearby big city, is they are so worried about that, they don't actually teach and the students don't learn.I suspect this is a bow to the oppressor/oppressed paradigm that undergirds everything in America today. “Student” implies “teacher,” and a “student/teacher relationship,” which is inherently hierarchical and therefore evil. “Learner” is much softer. We’re all learning, you know. — just trying to find our way in this mean, old world. No hierarchy implied.
Just a guess. . .But whenever you ask “why are we changing this innocuous word?” the answer might be found looking through the Critical Theory lens.
I think "Part 3 of The Airman's Information Manual," YMMV.and I'll bet every one of us think "Notice to Airmen" whenever we read the term NOTAM....
Shakespeare did it:
"It out-Herods Herod." - Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 2