Wife didn't approve.Well, I guess J hasn't flown in a while.
Wife didn't approve.Well, I guess J hasn't flown in a while.
Well, I guess J hasn't flown in a while.
Well, I guess J hasn't flown in a while.
You don't know that. Blocking atail number on the tracking sites doesn't mean the aircraft is not flying.at least not that aircraft.
You don't know that. Blocking atail number on the tracking sites doesn't mean the aircraft is not flying.
Got an email today offering me a radar reflective sticker for my plane that would guaranty an automatic Class B clearance, only $1000.00, payable in India. Sound like a good deal??
I forget why I bought a silver subby to flightradar24, but:
Well, I guess J hasn't flown in a while.
except that recently I did look at flightaware. On 4 July, the aircraft hadn't flown since 21 June.
no. All you need to do is talk to ATC.
(edit: green font for sarcasm)
No, it hadn't had any flights that showed up on FlightAware, because he blocked the aircraft after 21 June. You won't see any more flights there...
btw - he hasn't blocked it on every site...
First comment made me lol:
Cool Web site!
I do think the controller was at fault for not giving him vectors. Vectors out of the bravo. She really did do nothing.bah - blaming the controller is weak... beyond weak.
According to the poster on Facebook he received at as a response to his FOIA requestis this info coming from someone "on the inside" who has access to this data and is now spreading it on the internet?
According to the poster on Facebook he received at as a response to his FOIA request
Hard to listen to due to audio quality, but yes it's part of that posting, including a lot if info that would be considered PII. Makes me want to be very careful what I would say if I ever got a brasher.And did that recording get posted on the internet? I wouldn’t have guessed that could be an outcome of phoning the FAA.
It's a time code on the right channel. Listen only to the left channel and it's clear.Hard to listen to due to audio quality
Maybe I am reading into this all too much, but now I wonder if I should have clarified with that 2nd controller that I had been given the clearance. Thoughts anyone?
If you have a sick passenger maybe just telling the controller you have a medical issue would work better than getting into a ****ing contest with the controller.
Sure, it would be much more convincing had the pilot thought of it at the time, and not after the fact.
If you have a sick passenger maybe just telling the controller you have a medical issue would work better than getting into a ****ing contest with the controller.
I didn't look at his flight track but if you have a sick kid who is crying she has to go to the bathroom fort he last hour and puked don't you get on the ground?
The controller wasn't sure if the Bravo clearance had been issued by the previous controller so he issued a new one. Doing it that way is more efficient than first asking if it had been issued and then following up with a clearance if it hadn't.
Hard to listen to due to audio quality, but yes it's part of that posting, including a lot if info that would be considered PII. Makes me want to be very careful what I would say if I ever got a brasher.
That's quite a contrast with Harrison Ford's call after landing on a taxiway, in which he took complete responsibility.FOIA requests usually result in complete non-redacted information. In this case they decided to leave his name, address and phone number in the audio recording, however redact some of the information on the forms.
I listened to it out of curiosity of how these types of calls go. It was a bit hard to listen to, first because of the call quality, second because this guy just whines like a little diaper baby.