jaxcessnadriver
Pre-takeoff checklist
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2019
- Messages
- 125
- Display Name
Display name:
jaxcessnadriver
Lower boost... couple of welded tanks an another tank that I use on my irrigation well... problem solved!! *sarcasm
I refuse to believe anyone said that when sober (and meant it)"I painted the tanks black so they would radiate more heat".
This is more comically inane "engineering" from Muller. I broke out in laughter when he said it.
"I painted the tanks black so they would radiate more heat".
This is more comically inane "engineering" from Muller. I broke out in laughter when he said it.
"I painted the tanks black so they would radiate more heat".
This is more comically inane "engineering" from Muller. I broke out in laughter when he said it.
So when people ask if it's a one man band and he says no, that hes got people in California trying to get things in order for production. We just assume that's total BS right? I agree the best thing he can do is walk away. He needs to ask himself what the goal of this aircraft is. Is the goal still to be pressurized, get it in the flight levels, cruise at 230kts, stall at 65kts, empty weight of 2300, gross of 3800, takeoff in 1100 feet, and burn 9 gph. If you look at whats in the hangar right now, I have no idea how the second aircraft can come anywhere close to any of those specs. Which is fine if the goal has changed. Goals often do.He's at the point where he's just "doing stuff". He hasn't made **** for progress in over a year, and continues down the path of putting ineffective fixes on major problems. At this rate, he's gonna die of old age before the project moves forward.
I really think he's at the point of realizing what a disaster this project is, but hasn't figure out how to gracefully walk away.
I assumed that meant he exchanged a few emails with someone who did not immediately tell him to go pound sandSo when people ask if it's a one man band and he says no, that hes got people in California trying to get things in order for production. We just assume that's total BS right? I agree the best thing he can do is walk away. He needs to ask himself what the goal of this aircraft is. Is the goal still to be pressurized, get it in the flight levels, cruise at 230kts, stall at 65kts, empty weight of 2300, gross of 3800, takeoff in 1100 feet, and burn 9 gph. If you look at whats in the hangar right now, I have no idea how the second aircraft can come anywhere close to any of those specs. Which is fine if the goal has changed. Goals often do.
So when people ask if it's a one man band and he says no, that hes got people in California trying to get things in order for production. We just assume that's total BS right?
This is the first time I've ever seen a domestic hot water system expansion tank from the plumbing section of Home Depot installed on an aircraft.
The airplane is officially pressurized. Not the cabin, of course. Just the three-tier coolant expansion tank system. But he promised a pressurized airplane and he delivered a pressurized airplane.Its the missing link. Pretty soon, ALL aircraft will have expansion tanks from your local plumbing supplier.
All he needs is a stanley bostitch pancake compressor with an outside air inlet. Boom pressurized.The airplane is officially pressurized. Not the cabin, of course. Just the three-tier coolant expansion tank system. But he promised a pressurized airplane and he delivered a pressurized airplane.
I'm not a fan by any stretch, but he's actually right on this point. Black does in fact radiate heat better. There is science behind the fact that car radiators are painted black."I painted the tanks black so they would radiate more heat".
This is more comically inane "engineering" from Muller. I broke out in laughter when he said it.
I don’t see that as his mistake. It’s true that the black tanks might radiate heat better than an unpainted tank. But they are going to radiate that heat into the confined space of the nose of the airplane. He will gain seconds or maybe a couple of minutes of usable engine power, but after that he will just have more total heat energy trapped in the closed loop of an overheating engine. In order to actually conduct a test flight program, he needs a power plant that can operate at flying power levels for hours on end, not single-digit minutes.I'm not a fan by any stretch, but he's actually right on this point. Black does in fact radiate heat better. There is science behind the fact that car radiators are painted black.
I'm not a fan by any stretch, but he's actually right on this point. Black does in fact radiate heat better. There is science behind the fact that car radiators are painted black.
I'm not a fan by any stretch, but he's actually right on this point. Black does in fact radiate heat better. There is science behind the fact that car radiators are painted black.
The plane would not flyHis “fixes” are starting to look like something Dr. Seuss would do.
The plane would not fly
It was much much too fat.
He said "I'll add more power
to take care of that."
He didn't care for cooling,
So the thing got quite hot.
Three hundred degrees!
My, my, that's a lot!
Down the runway he ran
Stuck to tarmac, like glue.
But then what should happen --
Big surprise! He FLEW!
Wobbling up off the ground,
Flying, not like a bird.
It soon became clear:
This thing is a turd.
He got the plane down,
Taxied up to the chocks.
Poor pilot's knees
Continued to knock.
What will be next?
No one yet knows.
Perhaps plane improvements
From somewhere like Lowe's.
You're right. It's going to leak anyhow, so why even stick with a closed loop? What he should be doing is converting one of the fuel tanks to a coolant reservoir, which will then pass through the engine cooling circuit and then get dumped overboard. No radiator, pressure tank, or leaky plumbing required. He designed the airplane perfectly so the CG range with a full tank vs an empty tank will not be a problem. The range will go down from 3600+ nm to 1800+, but that's still plenty. You just have to remember to put Prestone in the left tank and #1 diesel in the right tank when you fill up.So what happens when he has catastrophic coolant leak? Loss of power and possible major shift of the CG aft when those nose tanks bleed dry--sounds like a "great" position to be in.
You're right. It's going to leak anyhow, so why even stick with a closed loop? What he should be doing is converting one of the fuel tanks to a coolant reservoir, which will then pass through the engine cooling circuit and then get dumped overboard. No radiator, pressure tank, or leaky plumbing required. He designed the airplane perfectly so the CG range with a full tank vs an empty tank will not be a problem. The range will go down from 3600+ nm to 1800+, but that's still plenty. You just have to remember to put Prestone in the left tank and #1 diesel in the right tank when you fill up.
You're right. It's going to leak anyhow, so why even stick with a closed loop? What he should be doing is converting one of the fuel tanks to a coolant reservoir, which will then pass through the engine cooling circuit and then get dumped overboard. No radiator, pressure tank, or leaky plumbing required. He designed the airplane perfectly so the CG range with a full tank vs an empty tank will not be a problem. The range will go down from 3600+ nm to 1800+, but that's still plenty. You just have to remember to put Prestone in the left tank and #1 diesel in the right tank when you fill up.
Careful, that sounds like the kind of advice he'd take.
Since refunded the deposits in escrow, I beginning to think he is a genius. I wouldn't be surprised if he's making more profit from his Youtube channel than he ever would selling airplane kits. Its more entertaining than a lot of things on tv.
Didn't Peter way back want to us fuel as coolant when he was putting the engine together?In my worst shower-thoughts engineering moments, I've considered whether or not you could use fuel as a coolant in conjunction with a small coolant loop in the engine, the large wing leading edge to radiate heat via wet wing and return-fuel spray bar, and just send like 5x the fuel volume to the engine, draw heat via a water-to-water heat exchanger, and return warmer unused fuel to the tank.
My thoughts are the engine is under most stress on takeoff, when fuel is coldest and most plentiful.
Then I read about the need for nitrogen inerting and autoignition temperatures, and I'm thinking.. nah, let someone else do this stuff. I'll armchair quarterback them instead
How many views is he averaging?
I heard somewhere a good rule of thumb is a youtuber makes 5 grand on a video with 1 million views.
It's already been done and IIRC is in regular use in some airplanes. Fuel is also used as a hydraulic fluid in things like afterburner nozzles.In my worst shower-thoughts engineering moments, I've considered whether or not you could use fuel as a coolant in conjunction with a small coolant loop in the engine...
It's unfortunate that some ideas that might actually have some basis in reality get trashed in the rush to pile on.Didn't Peter way back want to us fuel as coolant when he was putting the engine together?
It's already been done and IIRC is in regular use in some airplanes. Fuel is also used as a hydraulic fluid in things like afterburner nozzles.
It's unfortunate that some ideas that might actually have some basis in reality get trashed in the rush to pile on.
Nauga,
transferring some heat
It's already been done and IIRC is in regular use in some airplanes. Fuel is also used as a hydraulic fluid in things like afterburner nozzles.
It's unfortunate that some ideas that might actually have some basis in reality get trashed in the rush to pile on.
Nauga,
transferring some heat
I'm assuming it will have a conservative cruising altitude around FL650Well, huh. I guess I need to take showers more often.
I'll also need to start taking deposits on my new C-raptor homebuilt plane. My calculations modestly suggest it will do M0.8, generate 6gph of fuel in flight, and maintain a 9psi cabin on the strength of my proven aerospace technology ideas.
I have lots of these however that's where the difference lies between successful people and non-successful people. You can take these ideas, cultivate a good team of skilled people around it and actually generate something competent.. or you can sit by yourself in a lonely hanger and press ahead based on nothing more than dubious thought exerciseshower-thoughts engineering
In my worst shower-thoughts engineering moments, I've considered whether or not you could use fuel as a coolant in conjunction with a small coolant loop in the engine, the large wing leading edge to radiate heat via wet wing and return-fuel spray bar, and just send like 5x the fuel volume to the engine, draw heat via a water-to-water heat exchanger, and return warmer unused fuel to the tank.
My thoughts are the engine is under most stress on takeoff, when fuel is coldest and most plentiful.
Then I read about the need for nitrogen inerting and autoignition temperatures, and I'm thinking.. nah, let someone else do this stuff. I'll armchair quarterback them instead