mscard88
Touchdown! Greaser!
Nah, am just saying about flight review, not about this school. This flight school is robbery
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Teasing ya man. Just saying you'd be a good PR man for this school lol.
Nah, am just saying about flight review, not about this school. This flight school is robbery
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Wonder how the CFI's version of the story would differ?
They are both 141 and 61. I informed them I wanted to do 61 due to my ground test done and hours rolling into it. They still wanting to push their 141 requirements on their 61 students.
Forced ground school is usually a ripoff.
I am seeing a trend at this place....
This...especially if you can get it in writing.When he told you he wasn’t sure why but really felt like you need more training I would have told him he was being unprofessional and didn’t meet my standards as a CFI. Never go back.
I don't agree to one flight review in 2 years. As I pilot technically I can not fly for 23 months, go up with a CFI around the pattern few times and appear for the flight review and by some miracle if I pass, I just don't think I am a safe pilot. I am planning 6 month flight review, lot of pro pilots do that.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Hey, maybe so, but if it saves just one government job, isn't it worth it?Except it’s still required to be done every two years. That’s why it was silly when the FAA said they were no longer calling it a Biennial Flight Review.....because all the did was change the name without changing the periodicity.
Likely an insurance dictate.Our club requires a six month checkout
You are right, there are always two sides to every story.
For some reason though, he did check off everything on their checkout sheet and signed it as if I accomplished the items but gave it back to me so I could give it to the next CFI I was scheduled with in case it wasn't him and they would know what I completed.
I'm not a CFI but I've flown with a fair amount of Instructor Pilots both civilian and military and when you have a bad ride, they tell you. Everyone has a bad day on occasion and you hope its not on a check ride. This was not one of those days. If your job is to instruct or evaluate other pilots and you cant tell them what they did wrong, thats an issue.
probably so, our club has reasonable rules, but a good safety culture, well maintained planes, and a low price. most of our rules were written in blood over 60 years, so I don't chafe at them...Our club requires a six month checkout, and if you’re due for the faa fr then they just make the checkout long enough to cover it all
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
...and since a flight review is whatever the CFI sees fit to do, there's a lot of flexibility in what you do for a checkout, right?Disregarding the majority of this thread.. I will not sign off a rental checkout if you can't meet the standards of a flight review. I wouldn't think most CFIs would. Our rental checkouts are almost identical to a FR, except the renter can do the ground portion at home and bring a completed worksheet which cuts the ground time down to a half hour or less.
Combing a BFR with a checkout is a cool thing to offer people doing checkouts, and normally a good two birds with one stone thing.
The micromanaging of radio calls and price isn't good.
The not signing you off but not "knowing" why is fully unacceptable, and I'd ask for a refund for the dual you "received"
Find another place. Then write the owner of this money sucking 141 and tell them that no one will be coming any more. When this govt money dries up they'll change their ways.It WAS the closest 141 school but recently one popped up half the distance from Charlotte so all the Guard guys are no longer going to the school in question. I just already had the money up there and figured I would give it a try. I should have known better with their reputation at the base.
This particularly flight school is known for bleeding students dry. I have FIVE coworkers at the Guard that have had money sent up there and not one has finished. They keep dragging you through more and more training.
Sort of. While the flexibility is granted, if said pilot crashes the investigation will include the last FR for a pencil whipped signature. I won't be that CFI....and since a flight review is whatever the CFI sees fit to do, there's a lot of flexibility in what you do for a checkout, right?
I'm not suggesting pencil whipping a flight review...but if one's definition of a flight review is the equivalent of a checkride (as indicated by the OP), the instructor is missing tremendous opportunities to ensure that the pilot is safe AND proficient, and IMO doing little, if anything, to enhance safety, since what most pilots do is not go,out and fly checkride profiles.Sort of. While the flexibility is granted, if said pilot crashes the investigation will include the last FR for a pencil whipped signature. I won't be that CFI.
These 141 schools are milking the VA money. If you look at some of the cost comparisons between 61 and 141, it's outrageous. Obviously more instruction is involved in 141 but they can see DOD money a mile away. Same thing happened when the TA program AVOTEC was in effect. Local school I went to cranked up their rates because they knew DOD would pay and then when we deployed, they closed up shop and ran with the money. Bunch of these schools would shut the doors today if the VA terminated the Post 9/11 GI Bill.
Sort of. While the flexibility is granted, if said pilot crashes the investigation will include the last FR for a pencil whipped signature. I won't be that CFI.
I've seen 141 schools screw vets first hand. The only bigger cash cow is foreign students ( you get to screw them for housing too)
Maybe I'm the only one, but I'm kind of miffed that the VA is funding what is essentially a joyride. The flight doesn't sound like it was any part of a formal training program that would justify "tuition assistance." It sounds more like "free money" use it or lose it.
Maybe I'm wrong and if so, the OP didn't spell out how this fits into any training program. Time building...I guess...I dunno though. If he was rusty on the regs as the OP admits and is part of a formal training program, I don't blame the CFI for being cautious.
I just sense there is more to the story.
He checked off everything on the checkout sheet and signed it... but you weren't "ready"? That's really weird. He ought to be able to say you're not ready because _________. Also, I too think $400 is too much. Our FBO's rates are $35 flight, $30 ground /hr... $40 for own aircraft for the instructor then add the wet rental in.... I do my own plane but I think it's $120-$130 for a 172.
I would do the same. It's clear he did not receive any dual. He just had a CFI sit in the plane with him.
To which, sorry, I have to ask - what did you expect? Seems like you got a pretty predictable outcome.
Understood.
I'm in the crowd that was puzzled by the instructor not signing the guy off. Is someone doesn't fulfill the objective of a FR I was taught to just log it as dual and provide the person with a list of things they'd need to work on.
That didn't happen here.
And THIS is why things get out of hand. Not because of aftCG's statement but because the FAA will come after somebody. Last CFI that signed off his FR sounds like a great place to start the witch hunt. I've been an evaluator in the military for over 10 years and taken/given tons of checkrides. Everyone has a bad day from time to time - some people's bad days are on par with others great days but that's the nature of the beast. The attitude of looking/needing to find someone to blame for everything instead of saying "yes, flying airplanes is dangerous. This was pilot error." causes a snowball effect through aviation. Now the devils advocate side says that there needs to be checks and balances to root out the incompetent or blatantly negligent - I totally agree with that. The takeaway is how that oversight is administered and perceived by those being checked.
I saw this when my wife wanted to get her PPL. Her (new) instructor couldn't give specific feedback on what to work on before she solo'd. About 5 lessons in a row she was told - "You are doing fine, I just think you need more time". Those types of statements without any specific feedback are not conducive to a good learning environment. People lose motivation when they don't have a specific goal in mind. I knew some people at the flight school but stayed out of it till my wife decided not to continue her training. The next time I ran into the chief pilot I asked about that instructor; he said "yes, she didn't want to sign off anyone for anything - she was worried about what would happen to her if they ever had an incident down the road."
I've seen this at a lot of levels from PPL to ATP and in the military. Wonder why people don't continue to pursue avaition as a hobby or career? /rant
The instructors name is at the top of that form.I totally understand your feeling. The VA programs can get crazy with the amount of funding they are throwing at guys. My case is a little different. I get a little bit of money per year for education for currently serving in the Air National Guard. Some guys use it for college, others use it for other approved programs. This amount is enough for about a 1/3 of a PPL so its nothing substantial like the VA often funds. I'm not going to derail the conversion and shift to social or political issues but there is a generation of kids that think college should be completely free. I'm serving in the Air Guard (in a full time capacity) and working for an extra that my employer offers. By no means am I gaming the system.
I checked the receipt. $328, not $400, so I stand corrected.
I did receive dual... He asked for my logbook when we were done and filled it out like I was another student. 1.4 Dual, no PIC time, and remarks one what we did, signed his name, CFI number and expiration. He was instructing me from the get go and it was not like a checkout. Like I said before, it was odd- like I was a brand new student from the get go and continued that way, even through the flight.
Well, the guys going up there were working on the 141 Private Pilot Certificate. I was headed up there to get checked out. I was hopefully (and wrong, obviously), that it would go a bit smoother and less BS. Now I know some operations operate the same, regardless of your situation.
I was/am puzzled too. Attached are what I received from the guy. My receipt and their sign off. You can see what they covered, what he checked off, and he signed it. I've redacted the names of the instructor and Flight School as I'm not trying to start a **** storm, be an ass, or discredit a CFI. I posted this partly to rant and get it off my chest, get some opinions, and just have a conversation.
Mentioned earlier, there are two sides to every story. I said mine. My flying ability or how the flight is the obvious variable on who you ask, me or the CFI. What I will standby is the fact that I was given zero feedback, told I needed another flight or two but he could really tell me why or what I did wrong. Look at the sign off. He checked everything and signed it as if they had been accomplished to some standard, be it his or the FAA's.
Ultimately, it doesn't really matter. I'm going to pull the plug here, withdrawal the money and send somewhere else. The way they run their operation is not conducive to someone coming up to rent a plane for the day and take money out of their CFI's pocket because I wouldn't be logging dual.
You are correct...the real issue is that the instructor provides no guidance, either to you or the next instructor, as to what needs to be worked on.My gripe here is a signoff checklist that has been signed gives no indication what the next CFI needs to see. I suppose he is suppose to go up with me and an entire repeat done. Am I wrong here- even with an FAA checkride if you fail or don't perform a particular portion of a ride, you have to only repeat that portion of it on a recheck? So this whole process goes above even what a DPE would require???
In this case, theres nothing- the school would expect another hour in the plane with a CFI being paid as he has no idea whats hes looking for.
The instructors name is at the top of that form.
You do know that since you are rated, any dual time you receive can additionally be logged as PIC for yourself, don't you? As a veteran and
GI Bill user, my opinion is the VA should get out of the approval business of part 141 programs. If the FAA approves a part 141 school it should be automatically eligible for VA students. The VA knows nothing about aviation training and it's clearly evident to any veteran that has to deal with them.
Flight Reviews are not supposed to be checkrides although some evaluation of skills are required. I'd steer clear of this operation as it sounds like its designed to suck the money out of the pockets of clients.
not sure if you answered this yet... but what club to you belong to in charlotte?
GI Bill user, my opinion is the VA should get out of the approval business of part 141 programs. If the FAA approves a part 141 school it should be automatically eligible for VA students. The VA knows nothing about aviation training and it's clearly evident to any veteran that has to deal with th
I haven't done any research on this, but has anybody ever heard of the FAA holding an instructor liable for not covering enough and/or specific tasks from the PTS on a flight review?And THIS is why things get out of hand. Not because of aftCG's statement but because the FAA will come after somebody. Last CFI that signed off his FR sounds like a great place to start the witch hunt.
Who has had a BFR as part of a checkout? Does this seem extreme? This particularly flight school is known for bleeding students dry. I have FIVE coworkers at the Guard that have had money sent up there and not one has finished.
I saw this when my wife wanted to get her PPL. Her (new) instructor couldn't give specific feedback on what to work on before she solo'd. About 5 lessons in a row she was told - "You are doing fine, I just think you need more time". Those types of statements without any specific feedback are not conducive to a good learning environment.
Going back in the thread a bit, there was mention of having to use their DPE. Is that something a 141 can do or are they full of **** in that demand?