Nah. Little mistakes don’t get turned into videos.Anyone else hate that every little mistake we make can be recorded and turned into a video?
Nah. Little mistakes don’t get turned into videos.Anyone else hate that every little mistake we make can be recorded and turned into a video?
Pretty sure it was me but it could have been any of us. This was probably in the middle of the night or early morning since the controller was on both frequencies.
That airway between Norwood and Richmond is standard. You are actually going to fly it, at least from just north of NY until RIC. Even Gary Reeves who believes strongly about not filing airways, cites that as one of the exceptions.1) Foreflight is for planning and filing, and then put it away.
2) Sometimes simple and old (paper and pencil) is better - write it down
3) Then sit for a several minutes and load the computer with what you actually got
4) I've gotten some interesting multi step routes. I've never flown them, because once in the air Departure has always said "OK, just go direct now"
That airway between Norwood and Richmond is standard. You are actually going to fly it, at least from just north of NY until RIC. Even Gary Reeves who believes strongly about not filing airways, cites that as one of the exceptions.
Of course they will (although it's usually traffic flow needs rather than fancy). Of course we do.And they will reroute you if it meets their fancy. You just need to be ready for it.
Just curious.., has anyone pulled up the tapes for after takeoff and enroute to see how this guy did?
Disagree. We have no clue how he did enroute. Granted, he could have been in the zone of Oz and let the FMS do everything for him, but still would be interesting to hear. ATC instructions are always modified once airborn.no need really, we know how he did. We’ve all heard him.
We could get a feel for competency while flying.
Pilots who perform like he did on the ground don’t magically get better in the air.
This is like the transponder-observed controller in the DC SFRA. They will ask if you filed a flight plan. The answer had better be "yes." If you did and they can't find it, they still let you in. They so much as told me at a public forum they aren't the flight plan police.Pretty sure it was me but it could have been any of us. This was probably in the middle of the night or early morning since the controller was on both frequencies.
This is like the transponder-observed controller in the DC SFRA. They will ask if you filed a flight plan. The answer had better be "yes." If you did and they can't find it, they still let you in. They so much as told me at a public forum they aren't the flight plan police.
That was hard to listen to.
Question for ATC guys? At any point could this controller just refuse to clear him. It almost sounds like the guy is impaired somehow. It’s not like he had to taxi at some huge place. He didn’t even know where his runway was. Hope he didn’t have passengers. Imagine their dread.
was waiting to hear the “possible pilot deviation need to copy this number” and listen to him butcher up that read back.
Question for ATC guys? At any point could this controller just refuse to clear him. It
The Canada flight itinerary is a great concept.My flight plans are almost always with a trusted friend, or employee.
Part of the point in this thread is that it wasn't a "rapid fire routing."There are a lot of us out there with a fair amount of experience who fly almost entirely between uncontrolled fields or sleepy class D airports across airspace where our clearances are almost always direct. We probably also get our BFRs and IPCs at similar airports because that's where we live. IFR proficiency work is almost entirely fixated on flying approaches and holds not writing down rapid fire routings. If that's what you're used to and you get thrown a clearance like this I can see it being a bit of a surprise and rattling someone. Probably felt embarrassed and didn't want to ask for progressive taxi instructions at that point... or he was just fixated on trying to understand the complicated routing.
I'm not excusing it mind you, just trying to explain it. I've never had this much trouble but I've definitely had moments of feeling like I just dropped into the deep end when thrown something more complex than I'm used to.
I'd give anything to actually hear a mild pause during the clearance like this controller was doing. I never seem to get that, or often even spelling of the fixes....Part of the point in this thread is that it wasn't a "rapid fire routing."
I'd give anything to actually hear a mild pause during the clearance like this controller was doing. I never seem to get that, or often even spelling of the fixes....
I've gotten that too. Just last week in a route amendment. It should be done more often.I'd give anything to actually hear a mild pause during the clearance like this controller was doing. I never seem to get that, or often even spelling of the fixes....
Frankly, I don't understand the logic of spewing out a 15 point clearance without taking a breath. It only adds 15 seconds to pause a second between each fix and could save a whole lot more than that if it reduces repetition. I got one out of PA going south through the DC area, and she started out saying "I've got a lengthy clearance for you, let me know when you're ready to copy". When I did, she spewed the entire thing out literally without taking a breath. I lost her about a third of the way through and just left some space and started writing again for the last third. But when I asked her to repeat from x to y she started from the very beginning and went all the way to the end, again, without taking a breath. But I filled in the missing bits the second time. Would have been much faster to just take a tiny bit longer in the first place.
No. It only takes a half second distraction to miss a waypoint or one misunderstood name when they aren’t spelling them. When you are in an area where all the fixes are foreign to you, it takes far longer to decipher what you hear and write it down than it does to say it. You simply cannot keep up with some of these guys.That just comes with time and experience.
Much like the guy on the tape needs a little more, with time you’ll be able to get the whole thing down and read it back like nothing.
Do you still use CRAFT?
No. It only takes a half second distraction to miss a waypoint or one misunderstood name when they aren’t spelling them. When you are in an area where all the fixes are foreign to you, it takes far longer to decipher what you hear and write it down than it does to say it. You simply cannot keep up with some of these guys.
A clearance with 15 fixes and airways is beyond CRAFT. I was already in the air with a clearance, and they decided to give me 15 fixes with 4 or 5 airways in an amendment without taking even a moments breath spewing it all out. All well and good if you’re familiar with the area. I thought I did pretty good getting it all in two tries while flying the plane.
WhateverThat’s why they have you read it back, it’ll come with time.
Don’t be afraid to ask them to spell it out.
Do you normally fly in two-pilot operations?That’s why they have you read it back, it’ll come with time.
Don’t be afraid to ask them to spell it out.
Do you normally fly in two-pilot operations?
I listened to it this morning..... wow...just wow.
Later I was thinking....What are the odds this is a recording of a simulator pilot and one of those simulation controllers?...
Oh for Heavens sake…. The controller went PLENTY slow. No need for pauses.Frankly, I don't understand the logic of spewing out a 15 point clearance without taking a breath. It only adds 15 seconds to pause a second between each fix and could save a whole lot more than that if it reduces repetition. I got one out of PA going south through the DC area, and she started out saying "I've got a lengthy clearance for you, let me know when you're ready to copy". When I did, she spewed the entire thing out literally without taking a breath. I lost her about a third of the way through and just left some space and started writing again for the last third. But when I asked her to repeat from x to y she started from the very beginning and went all the way to the end, again, without taking a breath. But I filled in the missing bits the second time. Would have been much faster to just take a tiny bit longer in the first place.
I did not care for the controller saying “Norwich, OSCAR ROMEO WHSKEY” (as an example for most fixes).
Not me. It’s either one or the other, OR… Norwich *Thats* Oscar…..Seems standard to me.
Yes, they did. That is exactly what I said. In fact, that controller went very slow and spoke clearly. She DID pause very briefly between each fix. I said I wished my controllers went that slow, but I’ve not had one yet that did. The post you quoted was referencing a different situation in which the controller did not speak slowly as the one in the OP did.Oh for Heavens sake…. The controller went PLENTY slow. No need for pauses.
I totally agree with this. The worst case is when they say both for some fixes, and only one or the other for other fixes. Confuses the heck out of me.I did not care for the controller saying “Norwich, OSCAR ROMEO WHSKEY” (as an example for most fixes).
Should have just done one or the other. Sounded like she was giving two fixes.