1.) I have a detached garage that only has 110v 15a service
2.) To add high voltage service I would have to dig up and retrench under a very nice two tiered concrete patio
3.) #2 ain’t happening!
4.) My daily driving requirements range from 16 to 68mi per day depending.
5.) Would ~16hr/day on a 110 charge be sufficient to keep me going in something like a Tesla 3, or would I eventually run a deficit?
My Tesla 3 does a little better than 4 miles per kWh. If all you have is a standard 120V 15A wall outlet, you'll be charging at a max of 12 amps continuous, or around 1.44kW, and charging efficiency may be as low as 75% so 1.08kW. So, you should be getting a hair over 4 miles of range per hour that you're plugged in, or 64 miles if you're plugged in for 16 hours. On a cold day where you're using more power, maybe you'll only get 3 miles per hour of charging. So, if it's cold maybe you're starting with 20 miles less each day that you do a 68-mile day, but unless you're really driving aggressively or it gets extremely cold, you'd be able to very safely do at least 6 days in a row of 68 miles. If that isn't working out, a stop at a Supercharger can get you going again, or there are other solutions.
If it was really problematic, you could put a 240V outlet on the outside of the house and charge in your driveway on the occasions that you need a faster charge - Or maybe even plug into a 220V plug inside the house (dryer, electric range, etc) and chuck the cord out the window. But a quick stop at a local Supercharger is likely more convenient unless you live far away.
I don’t understand stupid statements like this. It’s not that simple and absolutely not true in many situations.
It's not a "stupid" statement. It should be true for the majority of people. Sure, there are situations where it's not, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't be the most convenient for most people. Very few statements are absolute, but that doesn't make them "stupid".
Man after reading all of this I am even happier with my hybrid. Been driving them for years. Efficient, but can still be taken on long trips without any concerns about fueling. No learning curve on how to refuel or which plugs to use or accounts to create. All the benefits of regen braking. The best compromise in my opinion!
Welllllll... There are issues with hybrids too. You've essentially got two entire powertrains plus the mechanical bits to mix them together, and neither the gas engine nor the electric motor is going to be particularly powerful. So, you end up with a heavy car that doesn't perform particularly well, you haven't shed any of the maintenance issues with ICE, and unless it's a plug-in hybrid you still have to go to the gas station, usually just as often because your gas tank will be small.
Hybrids are operationally flexible, and plug-in hybrids with a sufficient battery size can give you an almost-EV experience (except performance and maintenance), but there is no perfect solution.
For long road trip vacations, i still go with the ICE if i'm going to be remote, cities EV is easy.
I prefer the Tesla over the ICE for long road trips too. Autopilot on the highway makes it easy. As far as "remote" I went to Decorah, IA in the summer of 2023 and it wasn't bad. I hit the Superchargers in Mauston and La Crosse along I-90 on the way there, plugged into a wall outlet at the hotel as well as using a couple of L2 chargers in town when I was out and about. On the return home, I decided to take the slightly-shorter scenic route and head all the way to the Madison area (Fitchburg)... But then I discovered that there was a new Supercharger about to open in Prairie du Chien anyway, so I figured I'd stop and see if it worked yet, and it did. Made it all the way home from there.
Decorah is definitely off the beaten path, but the trip worked out well and was quite enjoyable in the Tesla. The Teslas aren't as common in that area yet, so it took me back a few years to when Tesla drivers used to wave to each other. Now it's the "California Camry" there are so many of them.
4) You'll go much farther if you learn to not use the brakes so you take advantage of regenerative braking as much as possible. That means that you may want to learn to get off the accelerator just a bit earlier than you're used to.
This is a Tesla thing. Hyundai, Kia, GM, Ford, BMW... All the others I have rented/demoed you hit the brake it does regenerate. Only tesla is the brake only mechanical brakes and not linked to regen.
Irrelevant - What I mean is that no matter what EV you have, generally the regenerative braking is not as strong as the majority of people hit the brake in an ICEV.
But, since you brought it up... I've had 5 electrified vehicles (2 plug-in hybrids, 3 fully electric) and they all work a bit differently when it comes to regen. Tesla gives you full control - You know whether you're using regenerative or friction braking because if you lift your foot completely off the accelerator, you're getting max regen and if you apply the brake pedal you're using mechanical braking.
Most of the rest, in their normal modes, will attempt to mimic an ICEV with an automatic by limiting the amount of regen you get when lifting your foot off the accelerator, and then the brake pedal is mixed - At the top portion of its travel you'll be lowering the limit on regen, and at the bottom you'll be adding the friction brakes. But, you don't know where that transition is and you don't have control over it, which is why most EV drivers who know this will switch their car into the 1 pedal mode. This was done by shifting to L in the hybrids, B in the Bolt, and I honestly can't remember on the BMW.
In any case, getting off the accelerator earlier will give you more regenerative braking and less friction braking, and it is more efficient to do so.
Incorrect. The 20A circuit, if done correctly has an alternate style plug (one prong is shaped like a T instead of an I). GM could have provided two connectors which provide information back to the vehicle on which style connector is in use.
GM, like most of the traditional OEMs, doesn't go to great lengths when it comes to EV related things, even though GM is one of the best of them. Their charger does not have a replaceable plug, it's just a normal NEMA 5-15. So, the software in the car allows you to choose from either 8A or 12A when charging at 120V. They didn't even allow for switching to a 20A or 30A 120V plug.
Ironically, their charger *is* capable of 240V because they use the same guts in international markets and just put a different plug on it, so if you cut off the 5-15 plug and put on a 240V plug, it'll charge just fine on 240V at higher amperages.
So I am going with how both of my brothers and a few other Tesla owners explained it to me. Single pedal, uses regen. Single pedal has two modes, when the battery is full or cannot accept a charge, in one mode no regen happens and you coast. This has "surprised" a number of drivers. The second mode will use friction brakes to match regen performance.
The physical brake pedal, is only connected to the friction brakes, and does not do any regen.
Tesla is *always* in "single pedal" mode, with max regen when you lift off the accelerator. There is an option to mix in friction braking to make it behave the same all the time, which nobody else does. (This is as you describe.) And yes, the brake pedal is always just friction brakes.
This is different then all the other EVs I have driven. They actually use regen when you use the physical brake pedal.
...because, as described above, they're artificially limiting regen performance to mimic the driving style of an ICEV unless you switch modes. In a Tesla, you're always going to be getting maximum regenerative braking if you're using the brake pedal.
There is no right answer. Totally depends on your situation and usage. If you have a garage or driveway with 220 service and drive mostly local, an EV is better than ICE. If your living situation does not support overnight 220v charging or you frequently take long trips, an ICE is better. If you are like most families and have multiple cars, owning one of each provides the best of both worlds.
As noted previously in this thread, most people do NOT need 240V charging to use an EV.
If you do have a two-car household and you have use cases that simply don't work for two EVs, the real "best of both worlds" is one EV and one plug-in hybrid. If the plug-in has enough electric range to handle your daily commute, the vast majority of your driving will still be electric.