I'm surprised a airport worker, who one would *THINK* would be a little more aware of the dangers of props, would do this.
I'm surprised a airport worker, who one would *THINK* would be a little more aware of the dangers of props, would do this.
I'm surprised a airport worker, who one would *THINK* would be a little more aware of the dangers of props, would do this.
Skydive ops hotfuel and load Twin Otters all day every day. Thre was another one at a DZ in NC about 15 years ago. Unfortunate but considering how many Twin Otter hot operations there are it really isn't unsafe.Nobody gets out of my plane until the prop is stopped. I don't care if the passenger is just going to a nearby vehicle to get a forgotten purse or article of clothing. The door doesn't open until total shut-down.
HR
She was on the ramp all the time.As for the two preceding comments you guys really need to read these news articles properly before just shooting from the hip and making some comment that she should have known better? Did you not see that she was an OFFICE worker. In other words she was NOT necessarily someone who would ever have been out there on the ramp.
Nobody gets out of my plane until the prop is stopped. I don't care if the passenger is just going to a nearby vehicle to get a forgotten purse or article of clothing. The door doesn't open until total shut-down.
HR
Yes. We don't shut anything down to load unless there is a significant load gap.The problem in high frequency, low ($$) margin operations in turbines is cycle costs. Ag, and I bet jump, operators get an allowance on cycles if you don't shut down all the way, we were getting 3 operational cycles for 2 against the cycle count if we didn't shut down between loads. At the end of a couple of years, that's a significant chunk of change.
The problem in high frequency, low ($$) margin operations in turbines is cycle costs. Ag, and I bet jump, operators get an allowance on cycles if you don't shut down all the way, we were getting 3 operational cycles for 2 against the cycle count if we didn't shut down between loads. At the end of a couple of years, that's a significant chunk of change.
I'm surprised a airport worker, who one would *THINK* would be a little more aware of the dangers of props, would do this.
Unfortunately some are not. A couple of weeks ago I was taxiing back to the ramp and this dumb ramp worker decides to pull a car right out in front of the plane as I slam on the brakes and he goes along on his merry wayI'm surprised a airport worker, who one would *THINK* would be a little more aware of the dangers of props, would do this.
She was the office manager at the skydive place. The plane in question was a twin otter and not their usual caravan.
Your point(and other similar comments) understood. Mine is not such a volume operation.
HR
Also with a recip there is no great benefit.
Must have been some sort of benefit. Mabe turnaround time, or something.
When doing the ag thing we'd only shut down when it was either too dark or too windy. Everything else was done with the prop turning, even washing windshield.
Because their shutdown and hot restart procedure is a non-event?With turbines yes, we never hot loaded recips.
Because their shutdown and hot restart procedure is a non-event?
This thread is an excellent example of Mike Rowe's concept he calls "Safety Third".
http://www.ishn.com/articles/93505-...safety-third-is--a-conversation-worth-having-Distant third, still entering the first turn as money crosses the finish line.