SkyDog58
Ejection Handle Pulled
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 14,600
- Location
- My own special place.
- Display Name
Display name:
Canis Non Grata
Is there a planning thread. It’s less than an hour from my house. Mainly depends on my work schedule. My days off are normally a week day
I suspect they will release some radically curved short-looking thing that looks more like BMW slept with an El Camino and ended up with a Tesla "pickup". That might sell fine to Honda Ridgeline owners. However, they're going to have a hard time capturing the mass truck market with something like that. 1970s, 1980s, to late 1990s all had pretty square shaped trucks. Ford tried to shake it up with a "modern curvy" F150 design in 1997, Chevy followed suit introducing the "silverado" with a more curved look in 1999. Truck buyers didn't respond well and wanted something with sharper lines. In 2004, Ford sharpened the lines up, Chevy in 2007. Both of them have continued to sharpen the lines with each new generation (GM about a generation behind Ford's lines each time, just look at google images).
It's very difficult to take pickup marketshare from the American big three. Toyota, Honda, Nissan, etc have all learned that lesson. We'll see what they do - I hope they come out with something that looks like and performs work like an American truck. That..I might be interested in. If it's some Cali yuppie bladerunner version of a pickup that can't tow 10,000 lbs. No thanks.
Ford has said that there will be a hybrid F150 in 2020 (chevy volt style). Four wheel drive with electric motors. A battery for some range. Plus a gas engine generator to give you whatever range you need. The cool thing is - they've said the truck will have enough electrical capacity to power your camper (or big job site tools). The above sounds like a winner to me. I'd love to not have to drag my heavy generator in/out of my truck bed each time we go camping. Being able to power the AC in my 34 ft travel trailer off my F150...tempting.
I hate adaptive cruise control. After a short time, you end up behind the slowest car on the highway.If they had offered it I would have jumped at the chance to get adaptive cruise control, I keep thinking about upgrading, but it's not that common in the small pickup segment yet.
I hate adaptive cruise control. After a short time, you end up behind the slowest car on the highway.
I like it so I don't have to keep passing people who think +-5 is a reasonable speed variation every time it's sunny or cloudy or dark, as it is now I tend to end up being the fastest car on the highway so I don't get stuck behind them and can just push the cruise control button. Also nice for following trucks at a sane distance until I can reach the next safe spot to pass.I hate adaptive cruise control. After a short time, you end up behind the slowest car on the highway.
I hate adaptive cruise control. After a short time, you end up behind the slowest car on the highway.
Ah, but if it's a Tesla, it'll automatically go into the next land and pass them.
They keep on going. The customer incentives are already going down and it has not affected sales. The emission credits have crashed in price and it has not had a material affect (so far).
Tim
Sent from my SM-J737T using Tapatalk
Well, so far I have read the doom and gloom about the next quarter or next round of bond payments for a two or three years.You mean they'll be able to borrow a couple billion a year forever?
While they will sell lots of Model 3s until the market is saturated and sales drop, the money to build the semi (announced production for sale in 2019) factory and hire the employees will cost four or five billion based on history. The pickup design and production line will run another three or four billion.
Convertible bonds are coming due, another four billion by 2021.
"Next land"?
Sounds like Elon already has Teslas using the hyperloop.
Curious about your views how the Volt you just took delivery of compares with the Model 3. Pluses, minuses, differences of note?
I have a Tesla Model 3 for a daily driver.
The car has a stated range of 310 miles, but when you drive on the freeway at 75-80 mph, the range does drop due to the increased wind resistance. I have found that at those speeds, I really have only about 280-290 miles per charge (75 kilowatts).
Here's some pictures of the Volt's controls. There are a lot of them.
View attachment 69067 View attachment 69068 View attachment 69069 View attachment 69070
[snip] Seems like the fix for 90% of the problems I’ve read, is to disconnect the 12V and connect it back up.
[snip]
I guess it runs MS Windows.a.k.a reboot it.
Question for anyone. I see computer type touch screens in newer cars. What happens to them when the temperature is cold... We had a low of -2f the other day. Any chance of freeze damage?
57.2 lifetime! Someone hasn’t been charging much or they do a lot of long distance driving.
I’ve read about lots of heat issues in EV. Mine had problems last year but has been working fine this year.
I guess it runs MS Windows.
They must have thought of that. It's been below freezing up here a lot recently . Neither the Model 3 nor the Volt has had any problems with it. In fact, neither have any of my several recent cars that had LCD touchscreens (BMW i3, Ford Fusion, Ford Edge).
They must have thought of that. It's been below freezing up here a lot recently . Neither the Model 3 nor the Volt has had any problems with it. In fact, neither have any of my several recent cars that had LCD touchscreens (BMW i3, Ford Fusion, Ford Edge).
Yeah, no kidding. But they did put 92,000 miles on it in ~5-6 years, so they did a lot of driving in it.
My average so far is about 75, and that's including the 125-mile trip home.
You mean, getting it to heat? Or having problems with the battery overheating?
That can be more true than you know. My Fusion had a "Powered by Microsoft" badge on the center console (Ford Sync 2 was made by Microsoft). It did once crash hard, but I pulled over, turned the car off and back on and it was fine. Very Microsofty for sure. Now, Ford Sync 3 was done by RIM (yes, the Blackberry people). Of course, at this point, RIM is probably just thankful to have something to do at all besides going out of business entirely...
The controls were all within easy reach for me, holding the wheel left my arms in a comfortable position, and I never had to move anything more than my arm. As I'm tall, I tend to have to have my seat pretty far back, and the center stack buttons are at the limit of my arm's reach in the Volt. I have to either lean forward a bit or twist a bit to reach the touchscreen and some of the other buttons in the Volt, whereas the entire touchscreen and the few other controls in the 3 were all within easy reach.
Getting heat. I believe on EV it’s a simple electric resistance heater and on ICE it uses heat from the engine. Last winter mine only got heat in ICE and EV it wouldn’t work. For some reason this year I haven’t had problems getting heat while in EV. Guess it fixed itself.
The touch screen just looks out of place because it's so big and it's integration into the dash looks like an afterthought.
If it were blended as a part of the dash panel it wouldn't look like it was protruding into the cabin. Mercedes, Honda, and others have a similar look which I just don't get. Inset the screen into the dash, don't just bolt it on the front.
"apply light force to steering wheel" ... how Star War-ish ...
Pretend like this isn’t a negative if you want, but it is. The fanboy criticism occurs when people see others not being honest about the downsides of their favorite new toy.
Looks like an afterthought, but now that I've used it, they were clearly thinking about that from the beginning. It's so much easier to use the way it is than it would be if it were sunk into the dash.
That just makes it harder to reach AND harder to see. I agree that it physically would look better from outside the car, but when you're in the driver's seat, it's placed pretty much perfectly.
So why not redesign the dash so the the center portion extends toward the driver another two inches? That brings the screen closer and still allows the screen to sit flush? I just think it looks like out of place from an automotive interior-design standpoint. They used that concept in the Model S and it appears to work well . . .
No, it doesn't. The Model 3 design is a lot more usable than the Model S. See my post:
https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/com...now-i-get-the-hype.114912/page-3#post-2631614
It doesn't just need an inch or two extra to be usable. It needs the better part of a foot, and the Model 3 has that.
But it has no flow with the rest of the interior. It sticks out like a sore thumb. It’s like two different types of paintings in one frame. In the S, it looks elegant. Like a car design should be. It the 3, it looks cheap, like they were trying to save money in order to produce a $35K EV.
It doesn't actually look or feel that cheap when you're behind the wheel. I agree it looks cheap from the side and especially on photos.
Not sure how else one would go about to design that - I really want the Model S display to also come out as far out as that, but it would be nice not to be on a pedestal as with the Model 3. But if you protrude the whole dash out to engulf a display that's in that position, it would also look goofy.
I certainly don't think it should be a flip-up or any kind of movable display either. The Model 3 display is rock solid, there isn't a hair of give on it when you touch it.
What, no super pursuit mode?
What’s the issue with the S screen? Is it too far away to read or is it hard to reach?