Mari, I agree with you, but Brad makes a good point above - it is tough for domestic manufacturers to compete with foreign manufacturers which do not have to comply with many of the (insert adjective of choice here - onerous / reasonable / idiotic / well-founded / visionary / moronic) rules and regulations, including those relating to jobsite safety, wage and hour and environmental issues.
Exanple: I represent many in the masonry business; sometimes, natural stone from a particular quarry in Italy will be specified, and then the quarried stone is fabricated into the desired shapes. When a supplier can ship the stone from Italy to China, fabricate it into the finished shape there, containerize it and ship it to the states, and still undercut the pricing a domestic fabricator can manage, you know there's a problem, and that problem (nutshell) is that the Chinese entity operates free of the basic regulatory environment which applies to domestic manufacturers and employers.
Query: Is it protectionism to require that foreign mfgs comply with the same laws as domestic?
Discuss.
Exanple: I represent many in the masonry business; sometimes, natural stone from a particular quarry in Italy will be specified, and then the quarried stone is fabricated into the desired shapes. When a supplier can ship the stone from Italy to China, fabricate it into the finished shape there, containerize it and ship it to the states, and still undercut the pricing a domestic fabricator can manage, you know there's a problem, and that problem (nutshell) is that the Chinese entity operates free of the basic regulatory environment which applies to domestic manufacturers and employers.
Query: Is it protectionism to require that foreign mfgs comply with the same laws as domestic?
Discuss.