Surprise! He refused to answer anything.
Where I practice (Washington and Oregon) judges really don't like that kind of gamesmanship. I don't know what the rules are in Florida, but around here on a motion by the propounding party (Cirrus) to compel further response, the judge might well order further response and make the responding parties pay the expenses of the motion; and if the judge is sufficiently ticked off he/she might order that the requests are deemed admitted. That would be game, set and match for Cirrus.So the only answer they give to any of the statements is
View attachment 24637
Where I practice (Washington and Oregon) judges really don't like that kind of gamesmanship. I don't know what the rules are in Florida, but around here on a motion by the propounding party (Cirrus) to compel further response, the judge might well order further response and make the responding parties pay the expenses of the motion; and if the judge is sufficiently ticked off he/she might order that the requests are deemed admitted. That would be game, set and match for Cirrus.
I am trying to understand the point he is attempting to make. Is this just an idle argument to create another round of paperwork or is he indeed trying to claim that the actions of the LLC are not his own ?
I am trying to understand the point he is attempting to make. Is this just an idle argument to create another round of paperwork or is he indeed trying to claim that the actions of the LLC are not his own ?
I don't see the responses, but I would object to any request that is essentially a conclusion of law or that speaks for a document. Haven't read this whole thread--just a bit. Interesting.
Campbell gave the identical response to all 29 questions.Plaintiff, CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, by and through its undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Rule 1.370, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby serves its First Request for Admissions, and requests that within 30 days after the date of service hereof, Defendants, KINDRED SPIRIT AVIATION, LLC, and JAMES R. CAMPBELL, individually, admit or deny the veracity of the statements set forth herein:
1. Defendant, James R. Campbell (“Campbell”), is an individual who resides in Green Cove Springs, Clay County, Florida.
Answer: Defendants cannot jointly admit or deny the statements set forth in Plaintiff’s First Request for Admissions as these requests are not directed towards theses Defendants separately. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.370(a) provides in pertinent part that “a party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission of the truth of any matters within the scope of rule 1.280(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request.” Emphasis added. Due to Plaintiff’s request being outside of the permissible scope allowed under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants must deny.
Here is an abbreviated version:
Campbell gave the identical response to all 29 questions.
Is that the legal equivalent of "you didn't say 'Simon says'"?
Just a couple of weeks ago I was wondering what happened to Jim Campbell. I remember amusing myself for two hours reading the NTSB transcript where he lost his medical.
Did he ever get his medical back? Frankly, I'm amazed that anyone would let him get within a quarter mile of an aircraft after reading that transcript.
Did he ever get his medical back? Frankly, I'm amazed that anyone would let him get within a quarter mile of an aircraft after reading that transcript.
Just a couple of weeks ago I was wondering what happened to Jim Campbell. I remember amusing myself for two hours reading the NTSB transcript where he lost his medical.
Campbell himself has repeatedly said that he never had the disorders. Seems like first stage of a cure would be to realize one has a problem. At about the same time Campbell was diagnosed, Government psychiatrists diagnosed John Hinkely Jr. with some of the same disorders. He's been under constant care, since, and HE hasn't been cured....
Ron Wanttaja
Does Campbell like Jodie too?
1. He was not suffering from the personality disorders testified to by the government psychiatrists, or.
2. At the end of his suspension period, he was able to convince an AME that he didn't have the disqualifying personality disorders, or,
3. He was cured of the personality disorders.
12/19/2011 Notice of Serving Interrogatoriesto Kindred Spirit Aviation, LLC
12/19/2011 Notice of Serving Interrogatoriesto James R. Campbell
12/19/2011 Request for AdmissionsKindred Spirit Aviation, LLC
12/19/2011 Request for AdmissionsJames R. Campbell
12/19/2011 Request for Production/To ProduceKindred Spirit Aviation
12/19/2011 Request for Production/To ProduceJames R. Campbell
I'm guessing the Requests for Admission will be identical to the previous set, but split between Campbell and his LLC. The Requests to Produce could be interesting.More Court Filings yesterday:
You can bet your bottom dollar that he won't respond prior to the January 3rd scheduled hearing.
The last set I posted (answer to request for admissions), I gave the court my credit card number, and they emailed the documents to me. I had them in a few hours.
If someone else wants to step up and order these, let me know. Otherwise I will order them this afternoon.
I'm guessing the Requests for Admission will be identical to the previous set, but split between Campbell and his LLC. The Requests to Produce could be interesting.
I'd be happy to order, if you haven't done it already. When you pose a question like that, give a bit more time...ever since some guys on RAH got into trouble posting about Campbell from their work addresses, I don't respond until I get home at night....
Ron Wanttaja
I think he once was a skater in the escapades as well.Those of you who have not lived through a few of his escapades have NO clue...
I think he once was a skater in the escapades as well.
As it turns out, I didn't get the chance to order them yesterday, and won't today either, so I'll plan to order them 12/22 in the morning, unless someone else beats me to it.
Attached. Ordering by phone works nicely...I've ordered them, will post when received.
Ron Wanttaja
.... with everything still in/on/attached!Oh btw, see #12: we want out aircraft back .
Oh btw, see #12: we want out aircraft back .
.... with everything still in/on/attached!
Any chance the hearing will actually occur today?
aero-news.not said:Cirrus refused to honor ANN's warranty on our SR22