- Joined
- Jul 3, 2012
- Messages
- 15,597
- Display Name
Display name:
Velocity173
That’s actually not too bad. Outside of Reynolds Number, most of that stuff I can understand.
Now this, yeah I’d fail out of this course in a heartbeat.
That’s actually not too bad. Outside of Reynolds Number, most of that stuff I can understand.
I definitely need to find that one!Foreflight has a 30 page TERPS? I looked but don't see it. Now you've got me curious.
Weren't you in the Army? Not enough pictures.I’ve read Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators cover to cover. Didn’t understand a lick of it.
I bought a copy of it when I was young and also read it. I'm pretty sure I was still in school working on my Mech E degree....I’ve read Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators cover to cover. Didn’t understand a lick of it.
I've taken a couple of courses (not that one) from the Practical Aero guys. They were well done and pretty interesting.That’s actually not too bad. Outside of Reynolds Number, most of that stuff I can understand.
Now this, yeah I’d fail out of this course in a heartbeat.
Heck, I was hoping you'd write one!I definitely need to find that one!
I always called the Army’s Fundamentals of Flight “aerodynamics for dummies.” Not much on equations, lots of pictures. Black and white though. Needs to be color.Weren't you in the Army? Not enough pictures.
I wanted to know everything about flying from the jump. Read these and many more. Sometimes more than once.For those that chose "all of the above", did you intend on reading the all from the start, or just over time you got it done? Was it boredom, career driven, a good pilot always learning? What was your motivation, if you care to share?
I find that Sheppard Air has been good, but after only now starting to read the PHAK after my IR, I shortchanged myself. I was in a hurry though to get from zero to hero. Now that I find it's taking longer than expected to get to hero, I have time to read. I can fill the holes that weren't taught or vaguely mentioned, being filled. It's why I created the poll.
Thank you for sharing. I’m starting pretty late in life with my aviation experience. Instead of regretting not being able to start when I was 13, I just hope to gain, learn, and appreciate my opportunity to live this dream as long as I can. I still cannot believe I can go rent a plane and fly through the clouds. It’s surreal.Got my first airplane ride in a C-172 in 1967 when I was 13 years old. I started reading every book I could get my hands on right after that, got a student license in 1969 and started taking lessons. So I've read all of those and many more technical, military, civilian, fiction and non-fiction novels, anything to do with airplanes and still going. I got one on Amazon a month or so back about guys flying Twin Beech freighters back in the 80's. There are still more out there to read.
No.Of those that voted in the accompanying poll, are you an instructor of any sort?
I have, although not cover to cover.how many here have read the TERPS and the various addendums?
While I am certain there are CFIs who never read any of these, they are really required reading for the certificate.Of those that voted in the accompanying poll, are you an instructor of any sort?
Why would one read the TERPS unless you want to design your own instrument approaches?can't answer the poll, because can only select 4 (don't think I've read the IPH, maybe just portions).
how many here have read the TERPS and the various addendums?
Same. Only because it was in our base library for years...I’ve read Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators cover to cover. Didn’t understand a lick of it.
So you can know the difference between good enough to pass a checkride and good enough to not hit stuff.Why would one read the TERPS unless you want to design your own instrument approaches?
I can read. Unless its those squiggly lines in the airplane logbooks. Can't read that stuff at all.Shouldn't the real question be, how many here can read.??
I learned to read while still in diapers...
at age 8...
I see you haven't read the Aviation Instructor's Handbook.I'd rather shoot myself in the face than re-read the PHAK. They could have shortened that thing by 90% and actually improved pilot comprehension and outcomes.