Ships sink submarines!I thought it was submarines and ships.
Ships sink submarines!I thought it was submarines and ships.
A not uncommon story! I started wearing glasses in 5th grade so NFO was going to be it. I suppose it made NAMI less of a big deal.Dayum… and that was that for that guy. Horrifying.
They drafted jets when I went through VT-10 in 1987. The VP community was piling up perdiem in classic P-3 deployments and they pressed hard with roadshows to show prospective NFOs how good life would be. That wasn't why I was there and not a single person drafted to jets made it through to winging.Latest class here nobody wanted fighters and they made a few go that track who didn’t want it. Seems like a different mindset lately…
I imagine it has a lot to do with how aggressive you are at trying to stay in the cockpit as well. As an SP I saw a wide range of hours with my commissioned staffers. Some would really press at getting on the flight schedule and trying to pick up PC. Others just accepted their staff path and even spent years in non operational flying assignments. You could see a 15 yr LTC with less than 400 hrs. Made my head hurt trying to figure out if they made their “gates” for flight pay. Some embraced the system and found ways to go from one desk job to another til retirement, while others just wanted to fly and either got out or jumped ship to 160th.I think what you and @hindsight2020 say is mostly applicable to the USN as well. I will say that the Super Hornet and Growler communities have career paths, where if you stay "on track" (on active duty), you will likely stay in the airplane for the first 14-16 years of your career. First sea/JO tour, then shore tour typically as IP in VT-J or FRS or weapon school, "Super JO" or Training Officer second sea tour (back in your fleet aircraft), followed by operational Department Head tour (fleet aircraft). 3-4 years of flight school and FRS, plus 11-12 years of those tours, all in an airplane. Post DH is typically the first time a VFA or VAQ person who is tracking in their carer will leave the cockpit, and that is typically only for a year or two as they await selection for CO/XO and slating to a squadron. Then back to the cockpit. So it is pretty reasonable to do 20 years with only a year or so out of the cockpit, even today. Actually, particularly today, given the shortage of O-4's we have in this community. That all being said, the average flight hours during those tours have probably decreased between when I was a JO, and what current JO's are walking away from their first couple tours with. We have guys right now where I work who are getting out as senior O-3's/junior O-4's who don't quite have regular ATP mins. That wasn't the historical norm. But again, that varies. If you deployed a bunch of times in your first tour, you probably got a few hundred extra hours over that average.
Interesting. ANG/AFR fighter units get wayyyyy more UPT applicants than heavy unitsLatest class here nobody wanted fighters and they made a few go that track who didn’t want it. Seems like a different mindset lately…
When I was a SQ/CC in the ANG, we had hundreds of apps for every slot. (Fighters)Interesting. ANG/AFR fighter units get wayyyyy more UPT applicants than heavy units
It doesn’t work that way.
I crewed with a guy who was in the Air National Guard. He married the base commander's daughter. The dad then sent him to Fighter School.
Cool, I know Murph(4:30) Competing against over 300 applicants!
With respect, you narrative is conflating causation and correlation. I find your framing of the dynamics of why aetc is so devoid of 11f undergraduate instructors, specious. The only thing you got right from where i sit is that indeed, 11Fs dont want to teach upt/intermediate. But that aint a our community is being maligned by "herbivores" dynamic, that's a look in the mirror dynamic.When I was a SQ/CC in the ANG, we had hundreds of apps for every slot. (Fighters)
I spoke with the T-6 leadership and they said there are little to no fighter pilots in the T6 and most of the IPs talk about how bad the fighter lifestyle is (as if they know) which is driving a lot of folks away from fighters.
No big surprise; very few fighter pilots want to teach UPT, and even fewer want to teach the basics. We need good people everywhere, it’s just a shame we are getting folks in the fighter track that don’t want it. It’s hard enough if you do want it.
...but I didnt say all 11Fs have attitude problems [*teaching undergrad]. What i said was that, of the problem children with attitude problems on that *front, all were 11Fs. Hopefully you understand that nuance, it's not a distinction without difference in the least.@hindsight2020
Wow, that’s a mighty big chip on your shoulder!
If you could stow the auto-hatred of all 11F types for a few before default flaming we could clear up a few misunderstandings…
I know several guys who have asked for AETC assignments for exactly that - QOL is generally way better from what I’ve been told. I certainly think it looks that way from the outside. Many fighter squadrons have bad culture and some folks can only see a fix for it by jettisoning the community; I don’t know anyone who hasn’t at least thought about it.
There can certainly be good and bad IPs from every walk of life. I never said that the non-11F IPs skill is the problem. The attitude towards fighter guys that was so forward in your post is exactly what I’m talking about. You paint with a very wide brush; students pick up on that too. Unfortunately many 11Fs that get non vol’d to AETC help to propagate the attitude you are so certain we all have.
Unfortunately many communities dump problem children on AETC. That’s a problem for so many reasons and it’s not fair to the ones who want to be there or the students who have to try to learn from bad apples.
“we need good people everywhere“ meant we need motivated IPs that are passionate about teaching in the pipeline. It’s a shame that the 11F communities traditionally have a negative connotation about teaching UPT. I think it goes back to the porch back in the day where once you left the community you never got back unless you were some general’s pet project. That was a tough pill to swallow for many - only getting one assignment in a fighter. The bitterness was misplaced but I understand where it came from.
Notice I didn’t say “i think the T-6 guys are bashing all fighter pilots”, I just repeated what the T6 sq/cc told me when we spoke about a student we had that was having some troubles. Lighten up Francis! Same team!
I used to talk to GA ANG F-15s all the time on approach. Saw one doing 600 kts once coming in for the overhead. Once they switched to B-1s, they hardly ever flew.(4:30) Competing against over 300 applicants!
The best piece of advice I got (and usually the first I pass along) is to bloom where you are planted. Sounds like you did just that; well done!When I finished UPT, I think just about everyone in the class wanted fighters. There was just one available, and the guy who got it flunked out in bomb school. This was the height of the Vietnam war, and I really wanted an F-105 "Wild Weasel." Instead, I got the C-130E and it turned out to be a wonderful job... most of the time.
@hindsight2020
Wow, that’s a mighty big chip on your shoulder!
If you could stow the auto-hatred of all 11F types for a few before default flaming we could clear up a few misunderstandings…
I know several guys who have asked for AETC assignments for exactly that - QOL is generally way better from what I’ve been told. I certainly think it looks that way from the outside. Many fighter squadrons have bad culture and some folks can only see a fix for it by jettisoning the community; I don’t know anyone who hasn’t at least thought about it.
There can certainly be good and bad IPs from every walk of life. I never said that the non-11F IPs skill is the problem. The attitude towards fighter guys that was so forward in your post is exactly what I’m talking about. You paint with a very wide brush; students pick up on that too. Unfortunately many 11Fs that get non vol’d to AETC help to propagate the attitude you are so certain we all have.
Unfortunately many communities dump problem children on AETC. That’s a problem for so many reasons and it’s not fair to the ones who want to be there or the students who have to try to learn from bad apples.
“we need good people everywhere“ meant we need motivated IPs that are passionate about teaching in the pipeline. It’s a shame that the 11F communities traditionally have a negative connotation about teaching UPT. I think it goes back to the porch back in the day where once you left the community you never got back unless you were some general’s pet project. That was a tough pill to swallow for many - only getting one assignment in a fighter. The bitterness was misplaced but I understand where it came from.
Notice I didn’t say “i think the T-6 guys are bashing all fighter pilots”, I just repeated what the T6 sq/cc told me when we spoke about a student we had that was having some troubles. Lighten up Francis! Same team!