Not all rainbows and unicorns either. A lot of this is whining for the sake of whining but they do have a point in comparing today’s military vs the past. All the services are having to give bonuses to keep people these days.
yabut, our esteemed colleagues are not talking about what the OP is asking. People misunderstand the nature of the so-called pilot shortage and retention crisis of the AF and Navy.
I know you know this already, this is for the benefit of the peanut gallery:
TL;DR version: Bonus/reasons/retention issue discussions are a complete non-sequitur in the matter of pilot accessions for an ab initio aspirant like the OP.
**Most can stop reading here***
Long version:
There is a bifurcation in this job, and it occurs exactly at the conclusion of the pilot's initial UFT Active Duty service commitment, when these bonus programs kick in. When they mean "shortage",
they mean shortage of pilots willing to stop being pilots and fill middling staff jobs. The reason those programs exist is precisely because after the initial flying commitment, the service does not want you to be in the seat, which ostensibly was the reason you joined in the first place. It's the reason my career duty history is eschewed by Active Duty and lampooned by active and reserve components alike, as dead-ender scutwork. I would have never been able to stay in the service as long as I have, had I tried to do this in Active Duty. It's not conjecture, it's right there in the fine print.
So they throw money at people, and most people don't take it, shocker. Those who were going to stay in anyways, take the free money, and the Service gets to claim a measure of retention. It's bad faith arguing all around, but the borg is too sclerotic to address it. Congress has bigger fish to fry, crappy excuse, but it's the truth.
The rest (which the video touches on most of the common threads) is merely a discussion of all the second tier effects of that occupational bifurcation thrusted by the Services' senior management.
The fundamental folly behind not understanding that distinction, is that these cluebird aspirants then think the AF/USN is somehow in Spirit/Frontier hiring mode, trying to push the equivalent of "Basic girl" 1500hr CFIs worried more about their clients' social media footprint threatening their FMS-monitoring dreams (too soon?), than the fact they themselves can't fly their way out of a wet paper bag single pilot. To say nothing of demonstrating the aptitude to employ a fighter under G strain, and RWR "you're-gonna-die-soon" tones effing with their head.
This would be akin to asking two airline pilots about "dUh DrEem" but one guy is a lifetime commuter, the other has never done anything but drive to the airport. You're not gonna get the feedback you think you're getting.
The irony is that these days, if you actually want to get air under your @ss, fighters and bombers would not be the place to go. As Gonky highlights with his experience in the lost Decade in the hornet, what those guys are getting today is downright North Korea Plus+. I have tons of younger co-workers, arriving with nothing more than 500 hours in their fighter, and that's all they'll get in their entire career. It's a short shelf life, at least in AD, for most people. That's why Guard/Reserve is so desired. If all you live for amounts to 125 hours a year, might as well have a true-part time schedule to go with it. Digressing.