I disagree. I think it fosters and provides the cynicism required in order to get up in the morning and do something about one's circumstances in an unfair world. Non-conforming behavior can easily be attributed to anger and bitterness. Let's also remind the peanut gallery that bitterness is strategically used here with a pejorative connotation; there's nothing inherently pejorative about bitterness, as it's merely the representation and displeasure with systemic and repetitive inequity. It also implies a static state. Nobody is suggesting the angry have to stay in place. I don't see this young man being static, so I disagree he's bitter. He's angry and I am glad to see that. It shows he's human and a non-conformist one.
The world doesn't owe the young man a job, that's noted. But the young man does not owe the world a stoic disposition just so those who are at the receiving end of favorable circumstances feel morally appeased, or even worse, validated. Screw that beta male perspective.
As it ties to GG, to not thread creep, If I want eye candy I do like the rest of society and rent it by the hour; not give eye candy the keys to positions of influence and stiocly let the car come off the rails when the S hits the F.
One is certainly wise to play the game and be scheming and selective as to how one verbalizes one's anger for the inequities of life, but not for one second should he sideline or dismiss that feeling, that's the day he might as well go on the dole, buy a bridge to nowhere and tell himself everything everybody else has, they must have earned on their own right.