Whitney
Ejection Handle Pulled
I'm pretty sure that burning him would be considered cruel-and-unusual punishment!
Unless he lives in Salem.
I'm pretty sure that burning him would be considered cruel-and-unusual punishment!
Nobody has been burned in Salem.Unless he lives in Salem.
That oil pressure switch setup is not cheap. The tee fitting that Cessna uses at the firewall to mount the switch in the oil pressure gauge line is expensive. If this stuff wears out, mechanics are tempted to just connect the Hobbs to the master contactor's bus side. The tee is around $300, the switch $50 or $60 or more. If you can find these parts.I thought ALL Hobbs ran off the oil pressure switch. Maybe that's not true but because of that perception I suspected a troll at post #1. Are there some that use the master for power?
No. The hanged them.Learn something new every day.
I thought they burned about 25 people who were viewed as witches.
I'm pretty sure that burning him would be considered cruel-and-unusual punishment!
I have rented a lot of 172s over the years, but there is only one that I rented for a while whose Hobbs ran whenever the master switch was on.I thought ALL Hobbs ran off the oil pressure switch. Maybe that's not true but because of that perception I suspected a troll at post #1. Are there some that use the master for power?
every rental I’ve ever done used Hobbs. I’m not sure why else Hobbs would exist other than for billing. Tach is more meaningful for everything else.Am I the only person who uses tach time, not hobbs?
Couldn't possibly care less what the hobbs says.
Service is usually done based on tach time, not Hobbs.Fraud like this, if done by enough thieves, causes the airplane to run well past scheduled inspections and AD compliance times. It also raises the costs for all the honest renters: more fuel and oil burned, more wear on components that then need replacing unusually "early."
They can't contest the entries in your logbook AFAIK.
Maybe in 141, I don’t know about that one, but certainly not in 61If he is in training, the CFI/chief pilot can certainly require you to void log entries as they will ultimately approve him taking the check ride.
I don’t think that’s unreasonable.
One assumes that the aircraft has a recording tach. Not all do.Just use tach hours in the future, much easier.
Nope. And not all aircraft have a Hobbs.I thought ALL Hobbs ran off the oil pressure switch.
I thought ALL Hobbs ran off the oil pressure switch. Maybe that's not true but because of that perception I suspected a troll at post #1. Are there some that use the master for power?
Let me begin by stating that I really try to do what’s right, but in these uncertain economic conditions, saving money is crucial.
Everywhere I have rented used Hobbs. But I agree with you, I wish they all used Tach time. With Hobbs I'm not incentivized to treat the airplane right, start up on a cold day and go full throttle until the destination. Since Tach is run off of the RPM's, I can sit and idle to warm up the engine and not get charged an arm and a leg. If I were king for a day, charging by Tach would be mandatory.They are not using tach Time?
Seems that charging hobbs time is also being crooked, so maybe you two deserve each other.
...This line, in light of what you did, is so ridiculous.
Let me begin by stating that I really try to do what’s right, but in these uncertain economic conditions, saving money is crucial.
Everywhere I have rented used Hobbs. But I agree with you, I wish they all used Tach time. With Hobbs I'm not incentivized to treat the airplane right, start up on a cold day and go full throttle until the destination. Since Tach is run off of the RPM's, I can sit and idle to warm up the engine and not get charged an arm and a leg. If I were king for a day, charging by Tach would be mandatory.
Now that I'm an owner I don't care, hell my plane doesn't even have a hobbs, unnecessary weight & complexity.
That's been a Hallmark for self-righteous people for decades. But has that reg ever *actually* been enacted to prevent an ATP?If the OP is looking to make a career as a pilot, this situation may follow him.
FAR 61.153 Eligibility Requirements
(c) Be of good moral character.
Intentionally defrauding your flight school I say would speak to your moral character. The aviation community is by and large built on trust. Trust that your logbook isn't forged. Trust that you won't fly under the influence of unapproved medications. Trust that you are properly pre-flighting and operating the aircraft. You have a record now of betraying that trust. How can the FAA, a potential employer, or future passenger, trust you?
LOL
I'm renting wet at the moment and on a cross country recently my instructor told me to bring the RPM's back a bit for efficiency and engine life. I chuckled and said "not my fuel not my engine I'm paying by the hour, I'm good"
This is just next level
Haha! The instructor doesn’t care, it’s not on his dime. I agree that charging Hobbs time doesn’t encourage renters to treat the airplane with kindness. Tach should be the standard.LOL
I'm renting wet at the moment and on a cross country recently my instructor told me to bring the RPM's back a bit for efficiency and engine life. I chuckled and said "not my fuel not my engine I'm paying by the hour, I'm good"
This is just next level
The instructor wants the airplane slower so he gets more paid hours out of the flight.Haha! The instructor doesn’t care, it’s not on his dime.
Exactlyyyy.The instructor wants the airplane slower so he gets more paid hours out of the flight.
Sticking fuel tanks to determine fuel quantity strikes you as unethical and immoral.Probably also means improper warm ups at times, fast taxi speeds, ultra quick run ups, and more, being done by rookies, which sure doesn't help with safety. The mere idea strikes me as unethical and immoral.
I'm actually surprised that a lot more students do not buy their own planes. If 3 to 5 students were to buy say a 172 together, it would be better than renting IMHO.
I bought myself a Warrior for training on, and am so glad I did.
Sticking fuel tanks to determine fuel quantity strikes you as unethical and immoral.
In the discussion of the Gimli Glider crew.I have no idea what you are talking about?
Where was fuel tanks ever mentioned?
Probably also means improper warm ups at times, fast taxi speeds, ultra quick run ups, and more, being done by rookies, which sure doesn't help with safety. The mere idea strikes me as unethical and immoral.
I posted awhile back and now I’m back again.
Let me begin by stating that I really try to do what’s right, but in these uncertain economic conditions, saving money is crucial. Over the past few weeks I’ve been renting some airplanes from a local outfit and fooling the hobbs meter so to speak by turning off the master when I can do so in airspace that doesn’t permit radio or ADSB. My goal was to try and stretch my dollar as far as possible. Fly a few hours, get billed for part of it and log all of it.
Well, needless to say I got found out by our chief pilot who put two and two together in ways that I didn’t think would get caught. I admittedly messed up, yes, I really screwed the pooch. I have no problem saying so. My problem now, and what isn’t fair to me, is that the school is trying to get me to erase the time in my logbook that I logged and didn’t pay for even though in reality I actually flew what I logged. Is this legal to even ask for? If I legit flew the time, I should be able to log it. I told the school I would gladly pay for the discrepancy of time not billed for and I’m going to, but they’re kicking me out and not letting me rent from them any longer. They also said to expect a letter and call from the flight standards office but I don’t see that what I did was a rule violation so I don’t understand what the FAA can do. Be kind, but please advise how this will turn out and what I should do now?