A Socio economic discussion about boomers.

If we're talking cheapest, it is most likely much cheaper to get a pay-as-you-go flip phone from Walmart and use the local library's computers. I wouldn't classify a cellphone as a luxury, but a lot of smartphones today fall into that category. No one *needs* an iphone or a Samsung that folds up, but a lot of people think they do.

I have no issue with people who want to work to put their kids into daycare, but it is rather silly to say that it is impossible to live on one income when in fact, most people are since most or all of the second income is being eaten through daycare, cost of second car/wear and tear/doubled gas costs, and lack of ability or energy to do things yourself like preparing homemade food, mowing your own lawn, and doing basic maintenance like oil changes for the car which save oodles of money.

When I was working as a preschool teacher at a daycare, I knew at least three moms who were literally paying to have a job just totalling up daycare and gas costs.
 
SkyChaser said:
If we're talking cheapest, it is most likely much cheaper to get a pay-as-you-go flip phone from Walmart and use the local library's computers.
Click to expand...
Remember that 2-bit also told people to find cheaper rent. Places that are cheaper to rent don't have libraries nearby. The one in my rural community is only open twice a month and the closest with regular hours is about 35 minutes away.

SkyChaser said:
I wouldn't classify a cellphone as a luxury, but a lot of smartphones today fall into that category. No one *needs* an iphone or a Samsung that folds up, but a lot of people think they do.
Click to expand...
Sure. But how about a three year old iphone or samsung that cost $150. That's a need.

Focusing on $1200 foldables seems a bit like casting a shadow on someone claiming that groceries are a real need because some groceries are a luxury.

Yes, poor people need food and it's possible to waste money on food.
Yes, poor people need cell phones and it's possible to waste money on cell phones or plans.
 
Last edited:
Morgan3820 said:
I do remember during the 2008 housing recession, at least locally, it was the McMansions that sat without a buyer. The smaller homes moved relatively easily.
Click to expand...
And the price of houses will never see those levels again. Investors with cash bought a lot during that time period. Wages have not kept up with inflation, and houses costs have tripled or more since then.
 
172andyou said:
Remember that 2-bit also told people to find cheaper rent. Places that are cheaper to rent don't have libraries nearby. The one in my rural community is only open twice a month and the closest with regular hours is about 35 minutes away.


Sure. But how about a three year old iphone of samsung that cost $150. That's a need.

Focusing on $1200 foldables seems a bit like casting a shadow on someone claiming that groceries are a real need because some groceries are a luxury.

Yes, poor people need food and it's possible to waste money on food.
Yes, poor people need cell phones and it's possible to waste money on cell phones or plans.
Click to expand...
Its the silly avocado toast argument. Looks like a lot of people have not actually talked and listened to a person in their twenties recently.
 
172andyou said:
Remember that 2-bit also told people to find cheaper rent. Places that are cheaper to rent don't have libraries nearby. The one in my rural community is only open twice a month and the closest with regular hours is about 35 minutes away.


Sure. But how about a three year old iphone or samsung that cost $150. That's a need.

Focusing on $1200 foldables seems a bit like casting a shadow on someone claiming that groceries are a real need because some groceries are a luxury.

Yes, poor people need food and it's possible to waste money on food.
Yes, poor people need cell phones and it's possible to waste money on cell phones or plans.
Click to expand...
I grew up in a small town with 1 bed apartments renting for about $500/mo and they had a small library open part time every day except Sunday and Monday so perhaps I am skewed in that regard. If you don't have a library, it makes marginally more sense to get a smartphone.

That said, even $150 is way too much to spend on a phone if you actually are wondering if you should buy groceries or a cellphone. I have never spent $150 on a phone in my life, and yes, I have a smartphone. One was a Shopko store brand and my current is a Motorola. My first smartphone was $35 and the one I currently own and bought in 2020 to replace that one was $90 including tax and shipping. I've priced out a replacement for mine, even a bit of an upgrade, because I accidentally dropped it and cracked the glass about six months ago, but it was $140 and I just don't think it's worth it.

I am not trying to make an avocado toast argument or claim a need is a luxury - and I am in my mid-twenties so I actually do understand the modern reliance on technology. I also still wash and reuse ziploc bags several times before throwing them out because for a significant period of my childhood, you either ate what was on the table or you didn't eat because there was no grocery budget for accomodating picky eaters. I know a bit about making choices and determining what is a need and what is a luxury.
 
Last edited:
You guys arguing how near to impossible it is to scrape by on a single income and that doing so means a life of poverty might want to think a little bit about the fact that @2-Bit Speed and @SkyChaser are making it work very well. One income (and not C-suite), both in their twenties, and it's not like they're living like monks. Two nice cars (loan-free), cell phones, a few toys, a vacation trip a time or two a year, building a 401k, and they just bought a home without subsisting on rice and beans.


1734138932767.png​
 
I see a lot of people who have a second income to afford what they call necessities. The boat, the second car, cable tv with numerous subscriptions, the vacation at Disney World, and the Disney cruise etc. If you are not making it, and I think most on here are doing well, or you wouldn't be involved in airplanes. Anway, if your career goal is flipping burgers at the place with the arches, you can't really expect to drive a Rolls Royce powered airplane. Although I know one who started there and never left the arches, who can easily afford that. But maybe you need to re think your career goals.
 
Half Fast said:
You guys arguing how near to impossible it is to scrape by on a single income and that doing so means a life of poverty might want to think a little bit about the fact that @2-Bit Speed and @SkyChaser are making it work very well. One income (and not C-suite), both in their twenties, and it's not like they're living like monks. Two nice cars (loan-free), cell phones, a few toys, a vacation trip a time or two a year, building a 401k, and they just bought a home without subsisting on rice and beans.


Click to expand...

but but but the TV told them it CANT BE DONE!!!!! or maybe it was a Facebook meme.
 
Back to the topic. What will happen when the baby boomers give up and the kids get the money. Or better yet, lets say you are a baby boomer with means. You decide to gift your grand kid $10k a year, and you live for another 20 yrs doing that. So if my math is correct, without growth that's $200k in the UGMA. So now all those 20 yr olds take their UGMA money and try to buy something, say a house. What happens to the price of the house with all that money flowing around. So similar to college tuition. UGMA accounts, college invest etc accounts. So potential students had money to burn, and student loans to fan the flames. Maybe college got expensive for a reason. It's certainly not for future financial success of the grads.
 
Oldmanb777 said:
Back to the topic. What will happen when the baby boomers give up and the kids get the money. Or better yet, lets say you are a baby boomer with means. You decide to gift your grand kid $10k a year, and you live for another 20 yrs doing that. So if my math is correct, without growth that's $200k in the UGMA. So now all those 20 yr olds take their UGMA money and try to buy something, say a house. What happens to the price of the house with all that money flowing around. So similar to college tuition. UGMA accounts, college invest etc accounts. So potential students had money to burn, and student loans to fan the flames. Maybe college got expensive for a reason. It's certainly not for future financial success of the grads.
Click to expand...
College got expensive when the government started backing all of the student loans and making it near impossible to dismiss them even through bankruptcy. That created a scenario where colleges had no incentive to keep tuition low because they had guaranteed money no matter what. Couple that with the push by corporate America to require 4-yr degrees for jobs that didn't previously need that hurdle, and you've got a spike in demand.

I still think they need to axe all of the government ment backing and allow the debt to be dismissed. I bet if the universities were having to hand out credit those tuition payments would plummet, along with about 30% of the degree programs that don't result in gainful employment. Sorry art history majors.
 
Oldmanb777 said:
What will happen when the baby boomers give up and the kids get the money.
Click to expand...

I've warned my kids & grandkids that when they come to the reading of the will to bring their checkbooks and credit cards as there will be people there waiting to get their money back ... :biggrin:
 
Half Fast said:
You guys arguing how near to impossible it is to scrape by on a single income and that doing so means a life of poverty might want to think a little bit about the fact that @2-Bit Speed and @SkyChaser are making it work very well. One income (and not C-suite), both in their twenties, and it's not like they're living like monks. Two nice cars (loan-free), cell phones, a few toys, a vacation trip a time or two a year, building a 401k, and they just bought a home without subsisting on rice and beans.


Click to expand...
I don't recall saying anything was IMPOSSIBLE. Just that it becomes really difficult when you have a single income below the median wage and home/durable goods prices that are highly inflated. Many people live paycheck to paycheck their whole lives, even when they spend responsibly. It's just keeping the discussion honest when you recognize that many people are on a shoestring budget and not everyone has the intelligence and means to dig themselves out of it without decades of struggle. That potentially leaves a lot of McMansions out there that the Boomers are trying to offload and not enough younger people with the means (or desire) to buy them, unless Boomers are willing to take a much lower price. We all see how old pilots are when trying to sell that airplane that hasn't flown in 20 years, the price never comes down until they die or run out of hangar rent money.
 
Do you suppose when the kids inherit the wealth that prices will soar? So we have a place in a touristy area. It has had its ups and downs. 10 yrs ago, much of the neighborhood was built by the owners. Many of them built their cabin with their own hands in the 70's and 80's. Hammering the nails, etc. We have been having a major shift in ownership. Probably over 60% turnover in the last maybe 5 or 6 yrs.
The new owners are very different. They don't do for themselves. IE they don't repaint the house themselves, they hire it done. They don't repair the deck, etc. Many of the people selling are aging and so it makes sense to sell. Maintenace and the climate here etc. Others are in a place where, "do you know what we can do with that reticules amount of money?" So they are selling. The people buying are often in their 30's, driving a Range Rover, towing a boat and buying very expensive second homes. So the transfer of wealth is happening, now. How far will it go?
 
SoonerAviator said:
College got expensive when the government started backing all of the student loans and making it near impossible to dismiss them even through bankruptcy.
Click to expand...
That mattered, for sure. But don't forget that state funding for universities went down about 80% starting in the 80's. So things got squeezed hard from both sides.
 
172andyou said:
That mattered, for sure. But don't forget that state funding for universities went down about 80% starting in the 80's. So things got squeezed hard from both sides.
Click to expand...
That is also a big factor in it. They certainly had to make up for budget shortfalls, but having a new (intrinsically) funding source backed by the government didn't give them any reason to hold back. I even considered tuition to be reasonable when I attended (roughly $100/credit hour). 4 years of college would run you $12K or so. Not a bad investment compared to the return. It really started getting out of hand by 2010 and afterwards where it's now 2-3Xs as expensive. The building that held the College of Business in was filled with fancy woodwork, marble floors, granite tables, and fully automated classrooms for window shades, PA system, etc.

The College of Education was a run down older building still using chalkboards, lol. I used to joke with my friend (an elementary education major) that they were preparing her for a career in public schools with outdated equipment and no funding!
 
I'm a boomer looking at 65 hard. We would like to downsize off our 9 acres and 2700 square foot home but sitting on that 2.25% mortgage is hard to give up.

I guess my kids will thank me later ((((sigh)))
 
Mooney Fan said:
I'm a boomer looking at 65 hard. We would like to downsize off our 9 acres and 2700 square foot home but sitting on that 2.25% mortgage is hard to give up.

I guess my kids will thank me later ((((sigh)))
Click to expand...

don't overlook how much the downsized place will cost...
 
My area is running $300 per sq ft. some a bit over, some a bit under. Depends on neighborhood, county etc. Fancy houses are way over. Preexisting really is dependent on neighborhood, but generally less. If its already built, price per sq ft doesn't mean much. Geographical area and neighborhood means everything.
 
172andyou said:
That mattered, for sure. But don't forget that state funding for universities went down about 80% starting in the 80's. So things got squeezed hard from both sides.
Click to expand...
When my father used his GI bill money to go to college, he had two roommates, there was one lavatory per floor, there was a cafeteria, students could work out in the "old gym" when it wasn't in team use, and the rec room had ping-pong tables and a TV..

When I went to college, there were one and two-person suites that shared a bathroom, a cafeteria with a salad, taco, and burger bar, a pub, and a dedicated gym with an indoor pool.

When my son went to college, all of the dorms were single occupancy, each with a bathroom, and the rec center, and cafeteria had been "upgraded" with private companies running what became a "fitness center" and a "food court". (The school's pub closed, but there were three or four just a few feet from campus. Each much fancier than the "Rat[skeller]".)

Forgetting inflation, in constant dollars, what my father paid for his degree was what I paid in a year, and what my son paid in a semester.
 
JackL-3J said:
When my father used his GI bill money to go to college, he had two roommates, there was one lavatory per floor, there was a cafeteria, students could work out in the "old gym" when it wasn't in team use, and the rec room had ping-pong tables and a TV..

When I went to college, there were one and two-person suites that shared a bathroom, a cafeteria with a salad, taco, and burger bar, a pub, and a dedicated gym with an indoor pool.

When my son went to college, all of the dorms were single occupancy, each with a bathroom, and the rec center, and cafeteria had been "upgraded" with private companies running what became a "fitness center" and a "food court". (The school's pub closed, but there were three or four just a few feet from campus. Each much fancier than the "Rat[skeller]".)

Forgetting inflation, in constant dollars, what my father paid for his degree was what I paid in a year, and what my son paid in a semester.
Click to expand...
Remember to compare apples to apples. The tuition costs do not include lodging. Tuition alone has exploded.

For lodging, you get what you pay for. Our daughter had a setup pretty similar to what your dad did. University of Illinois looks pretty similar: https://www.housing.illinois.edu/living-communities/halls/allen
 
Gen X here. The community college I went to in the mid 80s cost a couple hundred a semester, or maybe that was per year. Books and materials was a hundred or less. There were no fees or assessments attached. If you were hungry, there was a small, adequate cafeteria with mostly prepackaged sandwiches and such. Or you could do something really crazy amd bring lunch from home. There were plenty of places to sit and hang out. Parking could be a bit of a walk, but it was free. If you wanted activities to do with other students, well, it was a beach town, there were plenty of parks, bars if you were of age, no shortage of things to do.

Then over the years the Good Idea Fairy started making visits. The college administration got the county voters to approve massive - tens of millions of dollars - bonds to improve the campus. They built a big, opulent “student life center” for kids to hang out. The bookstore was expanded from a sufficent, if a bit cramped, room where you picled up textbooks to a spacious, modern store. Just in time for the internet to obsolete it. They built a 500 seat theater to supplement the existing one, plus a several hundred seat concert hall. The new theater has a huge stage with a multistory extension to hold several backdrops for the annual play.

Today, it costs six to seven hundred per semester, plus a bunch of fees for things like health care, parking, student activities (again, it’s not only a beach town, but also has mountains and redwood forests - people go there from all over the world, and they think the students need to have a local yokel college come up with recreational ideas?), even a “student representation fee” for the student council.

I can only imagine how much universities level this crap up to play at the state level. At least they have dorms and the students aren’t living at home practically next door.
 
ateamer said:
Gen X here. The community college I went to in the mid 80s cost a couple hundred a semester, or maybe that was per year.
Click to expand...
The state university I attended was $1,273.35 per semester for residents when I first went there in the fall of 1993. With inflation, that would be $2,780.16 today.

In state tuition today at the same university is $5,198.92 per semester, or 87% higher than it would be from inflation alone.

Six to seven hundred per semester for a community college is a deal. The local one here is $149.50/credit so about $1800 for a lower end "full load".
 
ateamer said:
Gen X here. The community college I went to in the mid 80s cost a couple hundred a semester, or maybe that was per year.
Click to expand...

ateamer said:
Today, it costs six to seven hundred per semester
Click to expand...
If only adjusted for inflation, $200 in the 80's is $750 today. So, at least in that respect, the cost of that school has been flat for 40 years. That's pretty impressive!
 
The reality is there was a nexus of events.

- The existing schools updated all that nappy-assed post-WWII infrastructure.
- They added amenities because that is part of the "USSnooze" rankings.
- Same thing with faculty. Upgrades because of US Snooze.
- States pulling back on subsidies.

The higher cost gets passed on to someone, and since the states largely bowed out, it falls on the students. Fortunately, student loans are easy to get.

There is/was a shady chiropractic school near me where the school went all out to help students get student loans. Which were immediately used to pay tuition at said school. Most of the graduates found the degree(s) to be something other than a recipe for financial success. So the school got paid, the students got a worthless piece of paper, and the student and the lending institution got stuck with a bad loan. Luckily it was a private school. Its owners came out OK. ;-)
 
172andyou said:
If only adjusted for inflation, $200 in the 80's is $750 today. So, at least in that respect, the cost of that school has been flat for 40 years. That's pretty impressive!
Click to expand...
Ah, I had not considered that. With seeing what the college dumps money into these days, they could actually cut tuition by a fair chunk if they’d cut out the luxuries and fluff.
 
ateamer said:
Ah, I had not considered that. With seeing what the college dumps money into these days, they could actually cut tuition by a fair chunk if they’d cut out the luxuries and fluff.
Click to expand...
Using my Alma mater as an example, the demo'd 3 "towers" which were the Freshman dorms. Concrete walled buildings from back in the 60s (included fallout shelter in the basement) which were generally 2-suites joined by a bathroom, so 4 people total. They weren't luxurious but they were functional, and while we were more than ready to get into a regular apartment or house after that 1st year, we still remember them fondly for the experience.

The university replaced the towers with a "village" of new apartments which I would consider nicer than any apartment in the area. So they incurred tons of debt to build a whole new complex that wasn't really necessary other than to compete with "student life" rankings. Old buildings were steel, brick, and concrete, so no real maintenance there. New ones are typical stick build apartments with drywall and wood floors. A plumbing leak now becomes a serious issue.

And we wonder why tuition/room and board goes up . . .
 
SoonerAviator said:
Using my Alma mater as an example, the demo'd 3 "towers" which were the Freshman dorms. Concrete walled buildings from back in the 60s (included fallout shelter in the basement) which were generally 2-suites joined by a bathroom, so 4 people total. They weren't luxurious but they were functional, and while we were more than ready to get into a regular apartment or house after that 1st year, we still remember them fondly for the experience.

The university replaced the towers with a "village" of new apartments which I would consider nicer than any apartment in the area. So they incurred tons of debt to build a whole new complex that wasn't really necessary other than to compete with "student life" rankings. Old buildings were steel, brick, and concrete, so no real maintenance there. New ones are typical stick build apartments with drywall and wood floors. A plumbing leak now becomes a serious issue.

And we wonder why tuition/room and board goes up . . .
Click to expand...
I can't speak to whether or not the new dorms are overbuilt or overly expensive, but remember that there are a lot of situations where it's cheaper/more effective to tear down an older building than to renovate it. Walker and Couch, for example, had mold problems and Adams had been empty because a burst pipe damaged the building beyond economic repair.
 
SoonerAviator said:
We have a ski boat that is older than I am, lol
Click to expand...

I don't know how some of these people buy new wakeboard boats. I don't think Malibu even manufactures a boat that costs less than we paid for our home five years ago. I think people are taking out 20+ year loans to buy them, too. If it weren't for old stuff, we wouldn't have anything.
 
Fiveslide said:
I don't know how some of these people buy new wakeboard boats.
Click to expand...

A few years back there was a guy in our maintenance department, makes $20/hr, who came to work bragging about the new wakeboat he had just purchased. We asked him what he paid, he was proud to say he paid $90k and was “boss of the lake.”

Dude’s nuts!
 
As an aside, does anyone waterski anymore? When I got away from waterskiing in the early 90s, wakeboards were just showing up. Last time I was at a lake, it looked like 100% were wakeboarding, no skis at all.
 
kyleb said:
- They added amenities because that is part of the "USSnooze" rankings.
- Same thing with faculty. Upgrades because of US Snooze.
Click to expand...
I don’t get why it’s so important for colleges and hospitals to get a good grade from what’s just a free newspaper for hotel lobbies.
 
ateamer said:
As an aside, does anyone waterski anymore? When I got away from waterskiing in the early 90s, wakeboards were just showing up. Last time I was at a lake, it looked like 100% were wakeboarding, no skis at all.
Click to expand...
Both brothers and nieces and nephews do. SIL also occasionally will do so. I have not in many years, never really enjoyed water skiing.

Tim
 
Bill said:
A few years back there was a guy in our maintenance department, makes $20/hr, who came to work bragging about the new wakeboat he had just purchased. We asked him what he paid, he was proud to say he paid $90k and was “boss of the lake.”

Dude’s nuts!
Click to expand...


It's gotten even more expensive. I think every manufacturer's flagship boat costs over 200 grand. Then they need the $70k diesel truck to pull it to the ramp.

I know some truly rich people on this lake we live on, most have older, reasonable boats.

ateamer said:
As an aside, does anyone waterski anymore? When I got away from waterskiing in the early 90s, wakeboards were just showing up. Last time I was at a lake, it looked like 100% were wakeboarding, no skis at all.
Click to expand...

I see a handful of people skiing each year. Every lake probably has a group of older folk that go out early morning to slalom and barefoot, before the wakeboats show and make the water too rough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top