Search results

Absolutely correct. However...unless he is wearing a vision restricting device, you cannot log PIC time, despite the fact you'll be acting as PIC.

You see, if the FAA simply issued an NPRM with actual regulatory language, these types of things could be hashed out as part of the notice-and-comment rulemaking process that the APA mandates. Instead, they prefer to avoid messy "comments" by issuing interpretative letters.

So, are you saying that a bulletin board in a really busy place might be illegal, but a low traffic location is cool? So now, the regulation (without using actual words) says "you can't hold out to lots of people" with "lots" being wholly undefined (as well as not ACTUALLY appearing in the...

Wow... Here's the title: When Can I Log PIC Time? by Mark Kolber, CFI

If you want to stop the development, buy the land, then you can do whatever you want or don't want with it.

Interesting...an advisory circular is not regulatory, and the other one applies to cargo and tour operators. The issue with FlyteNow is that the FAA is trying to impose regulatory burdens on people through non-regulatory processes, like Chief Counsel interpretations or Advisory Circulars...

And I would ask where does the phrase "holding out" appear in Part 91?

Store

However, the way it's worded, the FAA has 180 days to issue regulations to comply, and if they don't, any enforcement actions taken based upon their non-updated regulations will be null and void.

Been reviewed and decided by the Supreme Court. Gonzalez v. Ranch was about someone in CA growing MJ for their own personal use (non-commercial) pursuant to a license issued by CA for medicinal use. It was held that Congress' power under the Commerce Clause was enough to authorize the...

Everyone. State law does not overrule federal law.

That's a much safer business, legally speaking. Worst case, a new AG federally changes course and starts enforcing federal law, and your business drop off. If you're in the grow business, your business drops off, you get arrested, and all your assets get seized as proceeds of a drug...

No, it's not. The fact that the law is not being enforced does not make something legal. Here's what the Supreme Court had to say about someone growing pot, even for their own use, with a license from the State of California: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZS.html

As far as constructive advice... Talk to Dr. Bruce. He is an AME who specializes in difficult cases. http://www.aeromedicaldoc.com/ Hint: He does not suffer any dishonesty whatsoever. Tell him absolutely everything. If you hold something back, and it later comes up, he'll drop you...

Yep, that's the long and the short of it. Over .15 is evidence of tollerance, which is evidence of long term use. The HIMS protocol is basically you demonstrating zero use. That means stuff like AA, and it means peeing in a cup on demand for a while. The other issue you may run into is...

So did I, but I'll admit, not on my "first solo" flight. They were all stop and taxi back. Great thing about the airport I trained out of was 9,000' runways (we went to a smaller airport for first solo), so I had plenty of room for Stop and Gos, which are great for night currency.

So, my PMP would not be good then.

It appears that someone has endeavoured to set up a CAP version of Duffleblog.

You're wrong to ever say you're wrong. I prefer to say "I reserve the right to get smarter."