I guess I just lack the necessary ambition.That is a great idea! Are you going to start the thread?
I guess I just lack the necessary ambition.That is a great idea! Are you going to start the thread?
So we have two definitions of first-world: the correct Cold War era three-world definition; and the later woke postmodern definition. I will stick with the former reject the latter.
So we have two definitions of first-world: the correct Cold War era three-world definition; and the later woke postmodern definition. I will stick with the former reject the latter.
So we have two definitions of first-world: the correct Cold War era three-world definition; and the later woke postmodern definition. I will stick with the former reject the latter.
Someone recently referred to Barnstormers as “woke” because they deleted the seller’s phone numbers from the ads and you can only contact them via a link.And yet you use a very recent definition of “woke.”
Words and phrases evolve over time. I see no more reason to stick with the 1960s definition of 1st world than you see to stick with the early 2000s definition of woke.
That was deliberate. Glad you noticed.And yet you use a very recent definition of “woke.”
If you think this is a modern thing, or increasing in any meaningful way, you need to read more history. There is a reason it's super challenging to read books from only 500 years ago, and it isn't because language only started becoming deconstructed, repurposed, and repackaged for political and ideological ends in the past handful of decades.We live in a time in which the elements of language are increasingly deconstructed, repurposed, and repackaged for political and ideological ends.
Or because of technological changes causing words to be used within new concepts.If you think this is a modern thing, or increasing in any meaningful way, you need to read more history. There is a reason it's super challenging to read books from only 500 years ago, and it isn't because language only started becoming deconstructed, repurposed, and repackaged for political and ideological ends in the past handful of decades.
I don't.If you think this is a modern thing,
I do.or increasing in any meaningful way,
I have.you need to read more history.
Etiquette, along with airmanship, has been in steady decline for quite a while. Both are dearly missed.
I would say that this new meaning is still well within the spirit of the cold war meaning... And I've never heard it used as you said after this quoted portion except for to say things like "parts of Detroit are like a third world country" or somesuch.We live in a time in which the elements of language are increasingly deconstructed, repurposed, and repackaged for political and ideological ends. First and third-world are good examples.
First-world, properly understood, is a geopolitical term that referred to NATO allies during the Cold War. Second-world referred to Warsaw Pact allies, and third-world referred to everyone else. With the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, this three-world model became obsolete. The term first-world was abandoned and left to rust away in the basements of political science buildings for a few years, until the postmodernists discovered it. They quickly appropriated and redefined first-world to refer to wealthy, powerful, industrialized nations, while third-world was redefined to mean poor, unstable, underdeveloped countries.
Yes, but now we can b!tch about them to a much wider audience!I've been flying for over 50 years. There have always been jerks.
I think it is more often people who are oblivious, rather than jerks. We've put incredible safety features on almost everything you can name, so oblivious people aren't even motivated to pay attention to their surroundings these days...I've been flying for over 50 years. There have always been jerks.
Done - Here it is: https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/aviation-etiquette.148719/I guess I just lack the necessary ambition.
Funny story: I pulled up behind a fellow who was fueling, he had his daughter or his mistress with him, hard to say. Anyway he finishes up and fails to shut the pump off which could have meant I could have filled up on his dime. I didn’t, finished up, pulled the plane away and went into the FBO where I found the fellow. I said, “You didn’t shut the pump off, I could have filled up on your credit card!” Well, he had a strong English accent and she didn’t so I suspect she was his mistress, hats off. He says, “I was in a hurry! there was a bloke behind me!” Yeah, that was me. But next time shut the pump down, not everyone is honest.
... I could have filled up on his dime...
I know a British couple with very British accents, and their daughter has zero British accent. She was born here, her friends and everyone but her parents is American, so she sounds very American.Well, he had a strong English accent and she didn’t so I suspect she was his mistress, hats off.
That’s pretty much a description of the world we live in now."You don't know what that word means because you don't know what it means in my head, which is a meaning different from the commonly understood meaning," sure is a take.