I agree with this... I think Jay was out of line, but I also think that if you enjoy giving advice and helping others (and why else would Bruce have been doing this), you can expect a certain amount of crap. The two viable choices are to ignore the bad and enjoy the good, or (and this may be what Bruce decided) to stop the activity.
And Bruce is giving advice in the Red Board forum, where he doesn't have false allegations slung at him.
And Bruce is giving advice in the Red Board forum, where he doesn't have false allegations slung at him.
Is Bruce slinging personal attacks like he did here?
Wait 6 months and see where he is. Nothing new here, he has come and gone 3 times I am aware of. Like others have said, he can dish it out, but he cannot take it.
It's one thing to dish out snide comments, it's another thing to attack a man's integrity and make false accusations of greed. I never said he didn't dish it out, but Jay started it and it spiraled downward. Having talked to him at times about this board, he could take the bs. Just like your comment that you started with. I can see you don't care for the man and that's your prerogative. I can tell you it's comments like that which caused him to start questioning this board in November. Like I said, I think it was the baseless accusations made by Jay that was the straw. And I still think Bruce is owed an apology for that. It really doesn't matter to me because I know where I can reach him. It's the newbies who are unfamiliar with him as a resource with a question that will be initially hindered. Just my thought.
You need to re-read the attacks for the last 3 months.
You have no idea what I think of the man, or how I have tried to reach out to him.
My opinion is based in reading what you write.
And Bruce is giving advice in the Red Board forum, where he doesn't have false allegations slung at him.
Then re-read the last 3-6 months of what Bruce dished out, and get back to me.
And you re-read the comment I made regarding the accusations of greed. I'm not going to debate it. The stand I am taking is that Bruce's integrity was wrongly attacked by Honek and Honek should apologize for that. No more no less.
I'm pretty sure Jay did.
I've told him before to just ignore it but he admitted he just can't let something that's medically incorrect go unchallenged.
I'm pretty sure Jay did.
Then why take a shot at him?
And Bruce is giving advice in the Red Board forum, where he doesn't have false allegations slung at him.
You can't bite the hand that feeds you. If it wasn't for Dr Bruce I would not be able to fly. He has given hours of FREE advice and then Jay accused him of milking the system. I would be ****ed off too. Jay threw the first punch. I tell Bruce you said hello if I see him on my way through 3 MY on Saturday.
I bolded the only part of your post I disagree with.
Bruce's zoom climb comment was in his first post. Jay had not said anything to Dr. Bruce at that point. His comments had been confined to his existing AME, and a few potshots at the FAA medical branch.
The zoom climb comment was a carryover from the last thread where Dr. Bruce and Jay went at it. This did not begin over colorblindness. My bet is that it will not end there either.
After the zoom climb thread, I PM'ed Jay, told him I missed his contributions and hoped he'd return one day.
Dr. Bruce is now the only AME I will visit for the rest of my flying career. I will be beating down his door if he ever really retires. Like you, I am only flying because of his persistence and willingness to help me. He could have charged me triple what he did, and I'd have paid it without complaint. I respect him immensely.
In this one though, I'm not taking sides. They're both guilty. I learned most of what I know about the Cherokee 235 and the variants from Jay's postings all over the internet. Bruce saved my medical. I wish they'd figure out how to get along, but I don't rule the world.... so, it tis what it tis.
Agree. Anyone who thinks Dr. Bruce is even the slightest bit weak just doesn't know this guy.
Dr. Bruce is incredibly strong, generous, and intelligent. I wouldn't be flying if it weren't for him
Maybe this feud between Jay and Bruce was started earlier.
Maybe this feud between Jay and Bruce was started earlier. I
Will have to defer as one other individual directed me to the previous thread. However: no where in any of the posts regarding colorblindness did I see Bruce attack Jay regarding his business integrity or hotel business. In my opinion, you do not mess with a person's livelihood. In that regard I still think Jay was out of line. But that's just my opinion.
This is why I asked you to read back a couple of months, but you would rather argue without the facts.
And that was the big problem. It's OK to argue about airplanes but when somebody implies that a physician is motivated by greed it's different. Many physicians are guilty of financial bias but I am convinced that Dr Bruce is not one of them. It was beyond poor judgement to suggest that he was profiting from the system.No. Jay specifically stated he was not going to apologize regarding his comments on the colorblindness thread. He attacked Bruce's integrity. He was wrong on that and in my opinion he should apologize. I think you ought to re read that thread. My opinion has nothing to do about what was said by either party in previous threads. You just don't seem to get that. I think I am arguing with the facts. We will have to agree to disagree on this one.
And that was the big problem. It's OK to argue about airplanes but when somebody implies that a physician is motivated by greed it's different. Many physicians are guilty of financial bias but I am convinced that Dr Bruce is not one of them. It was beyond poor judgement to suggest that he was profiting from the system.
I concur that there is little change in anyone knowing the true cause of a sudden death as long as foul play was not involved. Having experienced same quite recently, I know knowing the cause won't change the outcome or lessen the pain.There is a good reason I don't offer medical advice unless I am paid for it and apparently the flame war that I missed is a good example of why.
Last night at a prayer service for the father of a friend. Afterwards they clustered around me and asked what I thought happened to him. He had a known heart history with prior Mi, etc. Had just rolled the speedo over the 700 mile marker on his mountain bike plus walking twice a day. Felt like a million bucks. Death was sudden after he carried some stuff out to the garage.
After listening to the wife who was present when he went down it was clear to me that death was most likely due to a rapidly dissecting aortic aneurism rather than the MI that had been casually diagnosed. (no autopsy)
Now, what would be served by publicly disputing the family doctor they trusted?
First: Not a damned the.
Second: It would not make the slightest difference in patient outcome. What he had is rapidly fatal and therefore untreatable.
Like Kenny sang, ya gotta know when to hold em and when to fold em.
No pizzin contest ever did anyone any good.
Anyone else ever notice how comments and insults with zero truth behind them are simply ignored. Takes more then a hint of truth to have any effect with an insult.
Anyone else ever notice how comments and insults with zero truth behind them are simply ignored. Takes more then a hint of truth to have any effect with an insult.
He just doesn't get it. It's one thing to question a physician's knowledge or judgement (Dr Bruce is unquestionably one of the best if not the best AME in the country) but to disparage a physician's integrity without evidence is absolutely unacceptable. I don't blame him for leaving. This forum has completely degenerated in his absence. Supplements for cockfighting, really? http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67762It's potential slander. As an example, someone who doesn't know Dr Bruce may have considered him before Jays comments and then changed his mind after. It's just plain wrong to attack a mans integrity with baseless comments.
He just doesn't get it. It's one thing to question a physician's knowledge or judgement (Dr Bruce is unquestionably one of the best if not the best AME in the country) but to disparage a physician's integrity without evidence is absolutely unacceptable. I don't blame him for leaving. This forum has completely degenerated in his absence. Supplements for cockfighting, really? http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67762
How so? Did I state that everyone here supports cockfighting? This is the same type of crap that ran off Dr. Bruce.Now you are insulting everybody on the board just like Bruce used to. Yes everyone here(except you) supports cockfighting. Funny enough the responses support my notion of no effect without a hint of truth.
It's potential slander. As an example, someone who doesn't know Dr Bruce may have considered him before Jays comments and then changed his mind after. It's just plain wrong to attack a mans integrity with baseless comments.
Now you are insulting everybody on the board just like Bruce used to. Yes everyone here(except you) supports cockfighting. Funny enough the responses support my notion of no effect without a hint of truth.
And that was the big problem. It's OK to argue about airplanes but when somebody implies that a physician is motivated by greed it's different. Many physicians are guilty of financial bias but I am convinced that Dr Bruce is not one of them. It was beyond poor judgement to suggest that he was profiting from the system.
I could not agree more, based on my personal experience.
He needs make a living, as we all do. But he's the least 'greedy' professional I've dealt with in a long time.
Concur. I had a (to me) life changing medical event over the holidays, and after I got home I called Bruce to ask how best to get my medical. He told me it would be in my best interest to have him do it all if I was willing to travel to Peoria when the time comes. I am.
When he quoted his price I was shocked! Not shocked at how high it was, but at how reasonable it was. He is NOT getting rich doing this and he is NOT "milking" the system. I am glad good guys like Dr B are on our side helping average Joes get back in the air.
Anyone else ever notice how comments and insults with zero truth behind them are simply ignored. Takes more then a hint of truth to have any effect with an insult.
Now you are insulting everybody on the board just like Bruce used to. Yes everyone here(except you) supports cockfighting. Funny enough the responses support my notion of no effect without a hint of truth.