Basically I want to be able to get to and thru my check ride with just two VORs for navigation while complying with the two approach requirements. Is that possible?
Also, you can't descend below 1200 on the first one or 760 on the second one without it. That leaves you a few hundred feet over the MDA in both cases.Both of them require a DME. How else could you identify the missed approach point?
Ignore the notes for a minute and just look at the approaches. How are you going to determine when you’re at each fix? Since the fixes don’t have crossing radials, you need DME, or an IFR approved GPS as a substitute. There is no way you can fly these approaches with just two VOR receivers.
Not doable. You need a glideslope reciever at minimum. Do not pass GO, do not collect your $200.Basically I want to be able to get to and thru my check ride with just two VORs for navigation while complying with the two approach requirements. Is that possible?
If an approach say LOC/DME Do I need DME?
View attachment 82216
If an approach says just LOC but has DME references in the plate, do I need DME like in the one below?
View attachment 82215
Not doable. You need a glideslope reciever at minimum. Do not pass GO, do not collect your $200.And a localizer receiver to go with it, though I've not seen too many VOR receivers that do not have LOC embedded in them. It is a distinct form of modulation.
I respectfully disagree. The LOC 21 approach says RADAR REQUIRED and can be executed with Radar identification of fixes. Just let the controller know you need him to do so.
Read the fine print...it does say so.Radar. If DME were required it would say so.
Radar. If DME were required it would say so. It says Radar Required, which means the powers that be are willing to let the controller do that work.
Read the fine print...it does say so.
Man--they really like their DME down their. I checked most airports in close proximity and it looks like Statesboro has an ILS /LOC approach that has a timetable but not much else. The Hunter VOR requires DME sadly. I never realized how lucky we were in New England to have a good number of VOR and ILS approaches marked by crossing radials.
Back to the check ride issue. How have you been training with only dual VORs without DME? Doesn't look like there are many options for you. For the record I *would not* use any non-certified substitute device or work arounds on a check ride--puts the DPE and you in a bad place. Maybe you could rent a plane with the required avionics or fly the referenced HXD LOC approach and have the controller identify the FAF and MAP. Certainly I wouldn't have my first time trying that be on my check ride. That would make an already uncomfortable situation worse.
Good luck!
Radar. If DME were required it would say so. It says Radar Required, which means the powers that be are willing to let the controller do that work.