geneseib
Line Up and Wait
I am becoming more and more convinced that the government rules primarily by intimidation.
What Power Does the FAA Have?
- Thread starter Lowflynjack
- Start date
I am becoming more and more convinced that the government rules primarily by intimidation.
RyanShort1
Final Approach
No, the FAA, and all the other government agencies, including the NSA, need to go back and honor the intent of the 4th amendment, the right of the people to be secure in their papers, and that should include written communication with friends - digital or analog - set to "private" or "friends only" unless they actually go get a warrant.
If the problem is real enough that it warrants a warrant, go get the warrant and fully prosecute the deal.
DFH65
En-Route
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
- Messages
- 2,629
- Display Name
Display name:
DFH65
People use social media and post all sorts of things about themselves. And it's free to anyone who wants to read it. Think about it.
Not sure how you could feel "threatened" when it is you posting the information online.
Agree why wouldn't they? I use social media all the time to check out potential employees when my kids were younger (adults now) I used it to see what kind of kids they were hanging out with.
Bottom line is the FAA knows about this guy and either they don't have the evidence or they just don't care and are not doing anything . No amount of additional snitching or regulating is going to change that.
I would also wager that the people that ride with him know what is going on. If something sounds to good to be true it probably is and they are also playing the risk reward game just like anyone else.
YooperMooney
Pre-takeoff checklist
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2019
- Messages
- 202
- Display Name
Display name:
CapellaXS
Oh man! No search warrant is required to read “poison pen” crap that your friends submit to law enforcement. Also, it really isn’t that hard for a LEO to submit a request to Facebook to view the information. Search warrants aren’t that hard to get so long that they are just.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Doc Holliday
En-Route
Again, your beef is with the provider, not the government.
RyanShort1
Final Approach
Yeah, but stuff about my infant daughter is not part of that.
Yeah, and as I said, I did make changes because of that.
Tantalum
Final Approach
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
- Messages
- 9,250
- Display Name
Display name:
San_Diego_Pilot
I've heard this too.. and it makes me cringe
Indeed it is.. and when you see people abuse that the only thing that can come from that is more regulation and government
Sad
Lowflynjack
En-Route
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 4,309
- Display Name
Display name:
Jack Fleetwood
I think they can look at your social media, but it would be hard to use it in court without further evidence. I can write that I'm an F-16 pilot on the internet, but the truth is I only photograph them.
I would not bet on the people flying with him knowing. He's flying a single-engine plane and his rates aren't so low that you'd feel like you were getting a great deal. Also, if you're not in aviation, you may not even know what is required to give commercial flights. I'm sure 90% of non-pilots have no idea.
RyanShort1
Final Approach
It's only a given because those same laws are ineffective and a waste of ink and other laws already on the books aren't enforced. Sadly, most of the pilots that actually killed people are certificated, too. I'd rather let some of those 70 year olds fly and worry more about the guys that aren't as well trained but legal. Both are problematic to a degree, but one is actually more dangerous. SAT actually used to have an examiner (My first DPE) who was in the category of the old guy that decided to fly license / cert or not and he was absolutely a safe pilot from what I and others could tell. It was political, not safety.
NordicDave
En-Route
Had a nice chat with a pair of FAA reps. I asked them about the "Wild West" Alaska situation and why the regs weren't enforced like the lower 48. Their reply "too remote, too many bears, too many guns".
Checkout_my_Six
Touchdown! Greaser!
It's not so much the FAA....but the power of the Federal gummint you'd have to deal with. The FAA will recommend action....other gummint agencies will do the deeds.
DFH65
En-Route
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
- Messages
- 2,629
- Display Name
Display name:
DFH65
Being single engine and small number of passengers he probably isn't a huge risk or a high priority in the eyes of the FAA. I am certain they have bigger fish to fry.
The NTSB acts as an administrative court for FAA certificate enforcement actions - suspension and revocation of FAA certificates. A single NTSB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) does the trial, taking testimony, etc. The full NTSB acts as a first level court of appeals to review the ALJ decision. A party not liking that decision can appeal into the federal court system.
(graphic is from a pre "Compliance Program" presentation. Other than an additional orange box, it's the same)
FAA civil penalty actions follow a different route.
For criminal process, it's outside both the FAA and NTSB. The FAA makes a referral to the Justice Department which then decides whether to prosecute. If it does it goes to the US Attorney's office for the pilot's district or a district where the event occurred.
Last edited:
Tarheelpilot
Final Approach
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2010
- Messages
- 7,506
- Location
- North Carolina once again.
- Display Name
Display name:
Tarheelpilot
Like most government they only have the power bestowed on them by the people governed.
Stewartb
Final Approach
I was subpoenaed to testify in an action against a friend accused of operating commercially without a 135 cert. The FAA did the deposition. The guy doing it was another friend. That was an uncomfortable situation. My (pilot) friend got a 6 month suspension of pilot privileges and I believe a fine. All administered by the FAA. He got his 135 the following year.
steingar
Taxi to Parking
Yes, they apprehended him and gave him whatever punishment they felt was warranted. Are they supposed to continue to punish him of the one transgression? Oh, he's still at it. How do they know? How are they going to prove their case to the DOJ so they can initiate criminal proceedings?
You guys are hysterically funny. You claim that the government can do no right, but you seem to think that government employees are psychic. I will say again for those of limited reasoned comprehension, if the FAA wants to initiate criminal proceedings, which is really their only leverage against an unlicensed pilot, they need evidence to make their case. When the guy crashes again they'll have it, and they'll lower the boom at that point. The security cameras at the airport don't report to the FAA. Jack doesn't seem to be doing jack about it but complaining here. So the guy goes on his merry, and will continue to do so until there's another event. My only hope is the event doesn't claim lives.
Last edited:
CharlieD3
En-Route
Might as well say "Too many FREE people."
Aviation is one place where I kinda believe in National/Federal oversight. It's really easy to cross state lines @ 110knots and greater. OTR trucking likewise... I guess. Though OTR trucking just seems to be $ oriented.
Alaska is a bit unique, Hawaii would be, too. Isolated as they are from the contiguous 48... That said, there's a whole lot less "freedom" in Hawaii than Alaska.
As usual, regarding privileges, the law abiding suffer as a result of the less honorable.
Shame, that carries over to rights as well (it shouldn't).
RyanShort1
Final Approach
??? No, it's not anarchy, and I never said no laws. Laws must be just, simple, and effective. Like, honest, go back to the 10 Comm... Which of those is this guy violating?
Clip4
Touchdown! Greaser!
Be patient, the wheels of justice grind slowly.
DFH65
En-Route
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
- Messages
- 2,629
- Display Name
Display name:
DFH65
Correct I would never suggest anarchy, minarchy maybe but anarchy no.
This is what is likely to happen...
Lowflynjack
En-Route
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 4,309
- Display Name
Display name:
Jack Fleetwood
You're right, I'm not doing anything here but bringing it up. I'm not planning to do anything either. This guy has already shown he's not stable (in many more ways than I posted here). He carries and AR-15 with him every time he flies and is wearing an ATF hat so if they see him on camera, they won't recognize him. I'm not a detective, but they are investigators - it's in their title. They can request footage from the security cameras and at least see he's still flying after they revoked his license.
Why do they need more evidence? I guess you're setting the limit that it will take another accident. He crashed and they said they know he was flying for hire that day. Then they catch him again flying for hire. Then they suspend his license and find out he just ordered another one and kept flying. When is enough evidence enough?
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2014
- Messages
- 9,770
- Location
- Broken Arrow, OK
- Display Name
Display name:
SoonerAviator
Correct I would never suggest anarchy, minarchy maybe but anarchy no.
This is what is likely to happen...
Winston's line is one of the best in that scene. "I have seen sh*t that will turn you WHITE!"
DFH65
En-Route
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
- Messages
- 2,629
- Display Name
Display name:
DFH65
Is it possible he is not as dirty as you think? Or that you don't have all the information?
For the record carrying an AR15 on every flight or wearing an ATF hat is not necessarily the definition of instability.
Maybe he is flying for the CIA like in that Tom Cruise movie.
topgun260
Pre-takeoff checklist
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 312
- Display Name
Display name:
Topgun260
This actually works? Hmmmmm
steingar
Taxi to Parking
How do they know to request footage from your cameras? Who told them? What day, what time? Do you really think FAA employees have the time to review hours and hours of security footage?
It's a little thing in our laws called Double Jeopardy. Nothing to do with the game show, I promise. It goes like this: if govco in some form initiates proceedings against you for some infraction and you get off, the same branch of govco can't do it again. They can try and get you for a different infraction, or a different govco entity can go after you. A good example is facing State criminal charges and then having to face Federal Civil Rights charges for the same offense. Yes, it's happened.
Now, if the FAA gets evidence of a second set of offenses, they can ratchet up the bar to primal proceedings provided their case is strong. They have a record of behavior (first offense, as you point out) and now they have evidence he went right along doing it. Photographs of him getting in and spooling up from Ace Detective and photographer extraordinaire Jack Fleetwood (a gumshoe's name if ever I heard it) might be enough. Complaints from pilots and personnel at the airport would help as well. Moreover, if said complaints contain specifics as to timed location, the investigating FAA person can actually review said security footage with some hope of success.
Moreover, if he really is carrying a loaded semiautomatic weapon into an aircraft he may be in violation of more than one state or Federal firearm regulation, since aircraft have a bad habit of crossing state lines. If the FAA won' shut him down the ATF might. They're cops, they have powers of criminal investigation and arrest.
Now I'm going to tell you why you should do this. You can see the guy's a danger both to himself and his passengers, not to mention innocent folks on the ground. How are you going to feel when he crashes and kills and innocent person? You have some skin in this, since you knew it was going on and did nothing but ***** on a message board. It's no different than seeing someone assaulted with the means of stopping it, and you do nothing.
YooperMooney
Pre-takeoff checklist
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2019
- Messages
- 202
- Display Name
Display name:
CapellaXS
Some of you guys paint a picture of FAA enforcement being the stereotypical overweight, overstressed, divorced, and alcoholic detectives portrayed on cable television.
Far from it. They have a job to do and respond to leads submitted by the public. Definitely not real boogeymen that don’t have any superpowers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Far from it. They have a job to do and respond to leads submitted by the public. Definitely not real boogeymen that don’t have any superpowers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lowflynjack
En-Route
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
- Messages
- 4,309
- Display Name
Display name:
Jack Fleetwood
I get what you're saying, but I've done about as much as I'm going to do at this point, which is very little. I understand they suspended his license while they're investigating. Maybe this isn't over. They may have more than I know, it's not like they're checking in with me.
The weapon didn't phase them. He had video of someone flying in the back of his plane with the doors off shooting it. They told him it wasn't wise, but not really illegal. It wasn't hunting, just firing it.
Remember I didn't start the conversation asking what I could do. I started by asking if the FAA even had the power to do anything. I understand they don't have the manpower to stake him out, but they could ask the airport manager to report when his plane takes off and pull the video. I'm sure he would comply.
It is a little different than someone being assaulted and not doing anything. I have seen his website and heard him talk about operating commercially. I've never seen him load people in a plane for a commercial ride and depart. He does this at nicer airports, so even though he's told me, it's nothing I can prove. I've seen his flight path follow exactly what he advertised as local sight-seeing flights, but so has the FAA. They told him as much. The most I could prove now is that he's flying when he's not supposed to be. I keep my camera pointed at airplanes (not his) for now.
Are you kidding? Frank Abagnale made zero training, zero certificates, and zero hours work!
http://www.spielberg-ocr.com/pilot.html
CharlieD3
En-Route
I suppose he could be working for ATF, FBI, CIA or any other alphabet entity.
As could his passengers... Or at least some of them. Some of the time...
I know that's far fetched. But, it is a possibility. If true, you'll never see him stop flying... Until he's needed somewhere else.
As could his passengers... Or at least some of them. Some of the time...
I know that's far fetched. But, it is a possibility. If true, you'll never see him stop flying... Until he's needed somewhere else.
Stan Cooper
Pattern Altitude
The FAA uses the DOT Office of the Inspector General special agents to investigate cases in which criminal activity is suspected, then turn over any evidence from the investigation to the U.S. Attorney in the federal district where the alleged criminal offense occurred.
Ask me how I know.
Ask me how I know.
UngaWunga
Pattern Altitude
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,020
- Display Name
Display name:
UngaWunga
If the FAA won't enforce their rules or get another agency to enforce them, why should he pay attention to them?
Lots of people have said the same thing about the IRS until they found themselves in jail.
danhagan
En-Route
Did this guy have a Youtube video a few years ago showing discharging the gun into the Gulf of Mexico?
There used to be an airport near me (closed now), that your chances of meeting a certificated pilot were EXTREMELY low, although traffic there was very steady. About 50% of the "pilots" departing that field would stay low a couple of extra seconds to go UNDER the wires at the east end of the runway as a show off maneuver ... lots of low level aileron rolls after takeoff also.
steingar
Taxi to Parking
As far as I know, possession of firearms in the US is legal. The FAA aren't the guys to enforce infractions of that nature anyway.
And a whole bunch of people have told you exactly what the FAA can do and what it would take to get them to do it.
In other words, you have no proof whatsoever that he's doing anything illegal other than flying when he shouldn't. Yet you denigrate the FAA for doing nothing. The law doesn't operate on hearsay, thankfully.
Doc Holliday
En-Route
Actually we're talking administrative law. https://administrativelaw.uslegal.com/administrative-agency-adjudications/admissibility-of-hearsay/
steingar
Taxi to Parking
Wahtdiyaknow. I learn something new every day. Thank you.
benyflyguy
En-Route
Sadly probably a smoking hole. Then they’ll turn around and claim too many cases, overworked, understaffed etc.