What a jerk..

I would be very upset too, but, the pilots should have been aware of the plane and asked it to be moved or turned around before starting their engines. Use your control locks and be aware of where you park or tie down.
 
The person taking the video and watching the damage occur was in the field of vision of the jet operator. He could have gotten the jet pilots attention and signaled him to shut down.
 
Almost destroys Cirrus is a bit dramatic. My planes have seen a lot worse thrown at them by mother nature than what that Cirrus saw from that jet.
 
Almost destroys Cirrus is a bit dramatic. My planes have seen a lot worse thrown at them by mother nature than what that Cirrus saw from that jet.

And it still fly's? :yikes: ;) Mother nature is such a jerk as well!!!
 
The chute didn't deploy?......meh.....maybe they aren't that safe after all.


(Dick move though)
 
The ol' Falcon 900.

Around 25,000 lbs empty

Holds about 2,800 gallons of fuel @ 6.7 lbs/gal = 18,760 lbs

Leaving a whopping fuel payload of 1,740 pounds.


They look a lot better with winglets, (but they add about 240 pounds to the empty weight)

I hate parking near these aircraft. Even a Citation 560 could send a Cherokee airborne.
 
Last edited:
Mother Nature 1, Visitor 0. Some days all you can do is say Hmmm.
 

Attachments

  • Lake Hood 3-13-03 012.jpg
    Lake Hood 3-13-03 012.jpg
    132.4 KB · Views: 164
Wonder what the FBO was thinking. The jet didn't get parked there under its own power. And they didn't toe it from the spot, they obviously expected the jet would need to start up and taxi away from there.
 
The person taking the video and watching the damage occur was in the field of vision of the jet operator. He could have gotten the jet pilots attention and signaled him to shut down.
Or at least alerted the line guy to have the jet shut down.
 
All they needed to do, if anything, would have been to swing the Cirrus nose to the wind. No big deal. Almost as easy as making a silly movie while doing nothing.
 
Oops. Bad place to park.

Was anyone else thinking "that's probably the most movement that rudder has seen" or was that just me?
 
The person taking the video and watching the damage occur was in the field of vision of the jet operator. He could have gotten the jet pilots attention and signaled him to shut down.

That was my thought as well.
 
If I saw this instead of recording the video I would just run up and move the Sr22.
 
That's like filming a purse snatching instead of trying to catch the thief.
 
Aren't you automatically a "jerk" by default if you're flying a French airplane? :wink2:
 
The rudder traveled at least perpendicular to the vertical stabilizer. I don't believe the rudder travels that far when moved by the rudder pedals. There definitely could be some damage there.
 
Well, if the Cirrus is inspected for damage and some is found, this video at least makes excellent evidence against the Falcon operator.

-Skip
 
Well, if the Cirrus is inspected for damage and some is found, this video at least makes excellent evidence against the Falcon operator.

-Skip

Interesting. Would this be the Falcon operator's liability, or the FBO that parked him there?

I can see lots of finger pointing. It's not like the Falcon pilot could get out and tug his plane anywhere without the FBO's involvement.
 
I can see lots of finger pointing. It's not like the Falcon pilot could get out and tug his plane anywhere without the FBO's involvement.

Not like he could look around his aircraft, see the risk, and instruct the FBO to tow him, is it. Jets this size never pay high fees at FBOs, so no doubt would not be seen as important clients whose requests should be accomodated :rolleyes2:
 
Not like he could look around his aircraft, see the risk, and instruct the FBO to tow him, is it. Jets this size never pay high fees at FBOs, so no doubt would not be seen as important clients whose requests should be accomodated :rolleyes2:

True. Of course, we don't know -- maybe he DID ask the FBO about it, and the line guy said "Meh, you'll be FINE. Go ahead and fire up!" :mad2:

One thing I've learned: Never blame ill intent for something that can be more easily explained by laziness or stupidity.
 
One thing I've learned: Never blame ill intent for something that can be more easily explained by laziness or stupidity.

True. That's a fair point, and one I agree with!
 
Hate seeing this. My plane is tied down outside, the guy behind me used to start his engine on his Bo, run it up and taxi it out of his space, set the brake and then park is new vette within inches of my plane. I asked him several times not to do either, a few other pilots asked him not to do it. After a couple months or so I let him pull his plane out, blast mine and park his Vette. I then said to him, watch this, I started my plane and did a full power run up, there were 5 other pilots laughing. He moved his plane parking spot that day. Is it so hard to be courteous?
 
Some times people just don't think. Plenty of blame to go around.
 
Hate seeing this. My plane is tied down outside, the guy behind me used to start his engine on his Bo, run it up and taxi it out of his space, set the brake and then park is new vette within inches of my plane. I asked him several times not to do either, a few other pilots asked him not to do it. After a couple months or so I let him pull his plane out, blast mine and park his Vette. I then said to him, watch this, I started my plane and did a full power run up, there were 5 other pilots laughing. He moved his plane parking spot that day. Is it so hard to be courteous?

My tent in the North 40 was shredded -- with us inside it -- at Oshkosh one year when an idiot in a 210 got stuck in the mud and held full power for over a minute to get out.

I took pictures of the moron's plane and plastered it all over the internet, for all the good that did. :lol:
 
The person taking the video and watching the damage occur was in the field of vision of the jet operator. He could have gotten the jet pilots attention and signaled him to shut down.

Thats what I thought as well.

Interesting. Would this be the Falcon operator's liability, or the FBO that parked him there?

I can see lots of finger pointing. It's not like the Falcon pilot could get out and tug his plane anywhere without the FBO's involvement.

Both.
This actually happened to a friends T182 Flyers Fan from this board. It was done by a Eurocopter Air Taxiing. Actually required replacement of the rudder.
 
Last edited:
Seems to be a lot of people blaming the FBO for the way both planes were parked...

Do you guys not have private jets (and large twins) in private hangars with their own tugs at your airports? My airport does, quite a few of them. Maybe the jet's pilot(s) pulled it out of the hangar and parked it there themselves???

Maybe the cirrus guy parked his there himself too?
 
Seems to be a lot of people blaming the FBO for the way both planes were parked...

Do you guys not have private jets (and large twins) in private hangars with their own tugs at your airports? My airport does, quite a few of them. Maybe the jet's pilot(s) pulled it out of the hangar and parked it there themselves???

Maybe the cirrus guy parked his there himself too?
I'm sure they exist, but I have never seen a jet operator with their own tug. I'm pretty sure even Norfolk Southern who has their own corporate hangar here at ORF uses the Landmark rampers to move their stuff.
 
The person taking the video and watching the damage occur was in the field of vision of the jet operator. He could have gotten the jet pilots attention and signaled him to shut down.

No kidding huh? I would have been shutting the dude down. It was likely a mechanic doing a test runnup.
 
It did sit there a long time. Once we start, we're gone.
 
I don't think the Falcon was "parked" there, it was doing a maintenance engine runup. Careless operation...
 
Perhaps the Cirrus guy is a total douche bag and they ran the jet up there on purpose and filmed it for giggles.
 
The rudder traveled at least perpendicular to the vertical stabilizer. I don't believe the rudder travels that far when moved by the rudder pedals. There definitely could be some damage there.

Put your glasses on and watch again. Not even close to perpendicular.

I'd guess +/- 20deg. off center.

This is much ado about nothing.
 
Perhaps the Cirrus guy is a total douche bag and they ran the jet up there on purpose and filmed it for giggles.

There is that potential, but only an idiot would put up evidence. That's like jizzing on a cops sandwich where the security camera sees you, and the cop can see the monitor.
 
Put your glasses on and watch again. Not even close to perpendicular.

I'd guess +/- 20deg. off center.

This is much ado about nothing.

Depends, have to inspect the Cirrus. There are hard stops on all those control surfaces, and that's a plastic plane. You'd have to take a close look before you can make that determination.

Shatter cracks are the 'fatigue' issue of fiberglass.
 
I was on a long cross country Chicago to Juneau. My carb heat cable broke in Canada and I was repairing it on the ramp. A Beech 1900 parked next to me started up taxied forward and did a 180 turn. His prop wash blew my engine cowling across the ramp. I ran after it and stopped it before any damage but a few scratches.

As the pilot was taxing out I Stood there with my finger in the air pointing to the cowl, he saw my cowl and figured out what he did. Slapped himself in the forehead. Kept taxing, didn't stop to ask if he damaged anything.
 
In the boating world we are explicitly responsible for any damage our wake cause in almost any circumstance. Surprised that is not more of a thing in aviation...at least while on the ground.
 
In the boating world we are explicitly responsible for any damage our wake cause in almost any circumstance. Surprised that is not more of a thing in aviation...at least while on the ground.

We have that rule. The person with his hand on the throttle in the video is 100% responsible. The only out that person would have is if he ensured the area was clear of his blast before entering the cockpit then the Cirrus was parked behind the jet.
 
I would be very upset too, but, the pilots should have been aware of the plane and asked it moved.

Pilots huh? Looks more like a engine run so there is a good chance that this was a couple of maintenance guys running some tests for a routine inspection. I taxied and ran all kinds of stuff when I work at the hangar in scottsdale. There was never a pilot around unless there was a high speed taxi required test or an in flight test.
 
Back
Top