Ravioli
Ejection Handle Pulled
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2014
- Messages
- 8,021
- Location
- Somewhere else
- Display Name
Display name:
Unwanted Guest - Perma-ban Pending
FedEx is delivering my $500 check today! That's ~125 gals of 100LL
Woo-hoo! Maybe a little relief in sight:
FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120 million
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech...ncys-largest-ever-fine-120-million/103102546/
If it's a live person I inform them I'm recording the conversation for the FBI. Fastest hangups ever.Sometimes, when I am in a sporting mood, I will answer a telemarketing call just to eff with them and waste their time.
I'm usually pretty skeptic of phone calls that are not from area because of telemarketers except for one thing:
I changed my number like 6 years ago. A few months after that, and even to this day, I get calls asking for "Ethel". I could block them, but most of the callers sound like they are about my grandma's age and with a distinctive southern accent. Some of the grannies are super sweet and respond with "Oh! I'm so sorry! Do you happen to know Ethel's new phone number?" but some insist that it is the right number and Ethel should pick up the phone. Some start guessing who am I related to.
I also get the sweetest group messages on X-mas and New years eve....
Good news. Unfortunately, I bet it won't change a thing, although I don't seem to be getting quite as many of these calls lately.Woo-hoo! Maybe a little relief in sight:
FCC hits robocaller with agency's largest-ever fine of $120 million
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech...ncys-largest-ever-fine-120-million/103102546/
Maybe they think you're Gertrude..?I get calls asking for "Ethel". Some of the grannies are super sweet and respond with "Oh! I'm so sorry! Do you happen to know Ethel's new phone number?" but some insist that it is the right number and Ethel should pick up the phone.
Not likely that it will do any good, but worth a try. The telemarketers have the idea that this Administration is not going to enforce that law & will cutback regulations even more (there was a proposal to allow telemarketers to leave you voice mail without even ringing your phone). Likewise I see no effort to force the big phone companies to do anything to stop the abuse.Start calling and faxing your congress critters and complain. Keep up calling and faxing. At some point, they will get the message.
Keep calling. Keep emailing. Keep faxing.
Usually you can find out the identity of the company paying the telemarketer -
That generates an email to their Privacy Policy info account:
Dear Sirs or Madams:
I have been receiving unsolicited marketing contacts from your company at my email/phone, or from a marketing company which I must presume you control.
I wish to inform you that I have a personal unsolicited contact policy. This policy requires the sender/caller to pay me $1000 per unsolicited contact including collection costs and attorneys fees. Sending me an unsolicited commercial email or phone contact is your agreement to my policy.
------------
FWIW, I just collected $1459.83 from a local car dealer for spamming me multiple times after receiving the above mail. $1000 for a settled amount plus $375 for attorneys fees plus $84.83 in court costs. . . .
I've gone into small claims a couple of times - and the defenses are remarkably inept. "I never received your communication . . .": well, we sent a request for id of Calif privacy rights to the same email address and received that response, or, "I never agreed to that" or the ever popular. . "We did not send it." Well who did? "we don't know." Ok - then I ask for a recess so I can do discovery - and I send them a request for production of every marketing contract they have - I have ALWAYS found the company who sent the email or made the call showing up in their response. Usually before the response I get a call from their legal beagles asking me to settle.
I have had a couple of people who I've sued tell me I'm being a leech on the system for suing them - and I ask them why they're violating the do not call list. The responses I get under oath are hilarious - most of them 'I didn't call you." Which the Judge then gets to explain to them the idea of agency. One guy simply refused to acknowledge that he 'controlled' the conduct of telemarketer by hiring them. He simply refused to understand that by hiring the company he controlled their conduct on his behalf. He even decided the appeal the $4300 small claims decision which generated a $8000 judgment against him principally for my attorneys fees. Then he refused to pay. Which caused me to send a Sheriff to his bank and seize almost $9000 on payday - which caused the pay checks to bounce.
Anyway - small claims provides anyone the avenue to pursue these claims against the business that hires the telemarketers . . .
Remember - its also against the law to spoof caller ID with the intent to mislead a consumer. . . .
Attorney fees ? I thought you were an attorney ?
Remember - its also against the law to spoof caller ID with the intent to mislead a consumer. . . .
how else can I collect twice?
What a racket !!!
I'm sending off now to the University of American Samoa for my correspondence Law Degree !
I do a very good job of imitating an automatic response system when answering a call from a number I do not recognize, and the calls rarely continue. I idly wonder whether, when that result obtains, there might be some possibility that the number is removed from that list?
When I answer, I allow a pause of about a second, then in a forceful but controlled voice (you who know me, know that "forceful voice" is not a stretch for me!), say, "Hello. Thank you for calling. (pause) Enter your access code now." Usually, that ends it, but if it continues (and it might be talking), I follow with "Enter your access code now." After that comes "Goodbye (click)."
May just be entertaining myself. But (again, known well to my friends here), I am easily amused.
I have just received two within the past hour. Surprising how sneaky these con-artists can be.Just got one of those spoofed calls with my area code and prefix. I never answer them.
I have just received two within the past hour. Surprising how sneaky these con-artists can be.
I've notice another sneaky tactic that they've been using. The calls used to be from out of state numbers and most still are, but I have been getting some that use the local area code along with the first three digits of my phone number. This makes it look even more authentic to insure a pickup. The first time it happened, I answered it, SCAM! Now everytime I see a number of that variation I just ignore.
These are sneaky little suckers.
That's new to me. Can you cite that law? California only or Federal?
Sometimes, when I am in a sporting mood, I will answer a telemarketing call just to eff with them and waste their time.
I've gotten those numerous amounts of times. I was fooled the first time.The specific guy that was hit with the $120m fine in the link above was using neighborhood spoofing.
"The calls used "neighborhood spoofing" technology to include local area codes and the first three numbers of the recipient's own phone number to encourage people to answer the calls."
I've gotten those numerous amounts of times. I was fooled the first time.
It's easy for me to tell, because my Google Voice number is an exchange from Ft. Lupton. I don't know anyone in Ft. Lupton.That one was an easy "no way" for me. My cell number is in a block that was assigned to only cells from one particular carrier in the 90s and my wife's is in the same NXX block. Nobody else I've ever talked to is in the same block.
I get at least 3 of those every day. Sometimes more than that... MANY more.Just got one of those spoofed calls with my area code and prefix. I never answer them.
It's easy for me to tell, because my Google Voice number is an exchange from Ft. Lupton. I don't know anyone in Ft. Lupton.
Based on your description though, it seems it would not stop the spoofed calls from within one's own area code, since those are generally legitimate numbers chosen at random by the spammer. The majority of the spam calls I get are of that kind. I'm tempted to try it anyway assuming it's free (is it?), but don't have high hopes that it would help me much.I have an app called Mr. Number. It recognizes numbers that other users have reported and automatically blocks them. If I get a call from a number I don't recognize, it takes just a couple of steps to block it too.
It's easy to use, works well, and doesn't have any ads or BS in the app. I have almost eliminated spam calls.
Like the number on Friday, it's busy. I guess they call so many people that it's always busy. Sucks to think about older or unknowing (usually poor) people getting victimized by these Indian scumbags.Yes. I just got a phony IRS call. Seems that I "tried to file fraud tax return". Who talks like that? I have to call them back and have a little fun.
361-209-8672