I guess I've gotta get out and drive an S, I drove the sports car and it's a freaking hoot, balanced better than a Lamborgini and way more comfortable.
I might as well step into this mess for my first post too.
Pilots are heavily represented as Tesla Model S owners and for good reason.
1. You get to do some flight planning figuring out range (although at 265 miles of range, daily commuting does not take much planning. Just plug in when you get home).
2. The acceleration is not unlike giving it full throttle on your takeoff roll. Except they acceleration is NOW rather than a few seconds after you advance the throttle. 4.x to 5.x second 0-60 times depending on model.
3. The 17" screen (which can be split in two) has a feel of a glass cockpit. It has Slacker for music, road map/GPS with traffic, and web access as long as you are in cell coverage area. all for FREE. I have weather maps and TAF Data Access as two of my web favorites. Pretty nice to have at a glance when you are thinking about flying.
4. The whole car is well thought out and well engineered and darn good looking. The car handles like a dream. Software updates pushed right to your car.
5. Driving the car reminds me of the fun of flying. I enjoy my commute, just like I enjoy flying to a destination.
6. The cost is familiar - similar to buying a used 172 or 182 :wink2: In the 60's for a stripped down base model to over 100k for the fastest version if you add all options.
Pilots are generally pretty bright. Do some research and come to your own conclusions. Test drive one as part of your research. You can thank me later.
Full disclosure: Not a TSLA shareholder, just a happy Tesla customer.
Ahhh. Reminds me of my first new car I bought,1971 Plymouth Barracuda, sassygrass green , black vinyl top. Only had a 318 w/auto. $3,064 out the door.
See that's what people seem to be missing. It's not an either, or situation. You can have both cars. Just because you drive a Tesla to work, doesn't mean you can't drive vintage muscle on the weekend...
Huh? You mean, "The State of Texas requires that Tesla comply with the same automobile dealer law with which every other manufacturer selling cars in the state complies?"
There is no "Anti-Tesla Law," just dealer licensing laws designed to provide some basic consumer-protection. It is not as if the law has ever been a big secret...
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/02/10/automobiles/stalled-on-the-ev-highway.html
This was an entertaining read.
This guy didn't even make it off the lot
I guess that invisible hand thrust him smack into that sign.
Just test drove a black Tesla Model S +P85 two weeks ago. This was the top of the line model with the biggest motor. Man - is all I can say! I have never felt acceleration like that. It was like a giant invisible hand just thrusted me forward only accompanied by wind noise! And whenever I thought I really pressed the accelerator down and was driving actively, the sales rep kept saying I wasn't even close to max. Car handled really well on the curvy road and the adjustable regenerative braking I got used to instantly. Almost never had to use the brakes.
I was already partial to it, but the test drive set off a serious desire. It's a little more money than I'd like to spend, but I'm still thinking about it. Be about $1000/month over 60 months. That's a lot of money for a car. But then again I have to deduct the fuel savings and the maintenance savings from that, which is no small sum. Me and my fiancee probably spend around $200/week on gas. Not to mention the ability to access car pool lanes here in congested California.
This week they announced the smaller Model 3 to be released in a few years. Guide price would be $35K for that model. It's seriously pretty as well, but I'm not sure I can wait 3 more years…
I like the Tesla car... But, I'm also interested in the new Fuel Cell tech that Toyota just announced. FC has significantly more range to it.
Even at 50% efficiency still beast an internal combustion engine...
This guy didn't even make it off the lot
Not if the power came from fossil fuel-fired powerplants. They aren't anywhere near efficient, either. Add up all the losses, from the powerplant's fuel to the electric car's wheels, and I bet we'd see at least the same sort of 75% loss as the IC engine. Maybe worse.
Dan
This guy didn't even make it off the lot
Just to make sure Tesla fans are aware of the environmental impact of electric cars. Electric cars make twice the amount of green house gas as mogas cars.
Remember, the electricity comes from a coal fired plant. If you want electric cars to be truly green, ya gotta push for nuke power plants. oh wait. Is that okay?
Just to make sure Tesla fans are aware of the environmental impact of electric cars. Electric cars make twice the amount of green house gas as mogas cars.
Remember, the electricity comes from a coal fired plant. If you want electric cars to be truly green, ya gotta push for nuke power plants. oh wait. Is that okay?
Not if the power came from fossil fuel-fired powerplants. They aren't anywhere near efficient, either. Add up all the losses, from the powerplant's fuel to the electric car's wheels, and I bet we'd see at least the same sort of 75% loss as the IC engine. Maybe worse.
Dan
All my electricity comes from here:
If they'd make a Tesla that could climb this five months out of the year:
I'd buy one.
If they'd make a Tesla that could climb this five months out of the year:
I'd buy one.
For instance, the waste water nuke plant near Phoenix supplies Los Angeles with 10% of its power.
Where I will use and operate an electric car, or any other electric vehicle that comes along, I will be utilizing very little coal.Electricity supplies from existing coal and petroleum coke plants represented about 8 percent of the total energy requirements to serve loads in California load during 2012. A little over 93 percent of this coal-based energy came from power plants located outside California. From 2007 to 2012, coal energy imports declined by 18 percent, a trend that will continue through 2019 as existing contracts expire and as ownership interests are divested or retired.
From 2007 to 2012, energy from in-state coal and petroleum (pet) coke plants declined by 62 percent. Eight in-state coal and pet coke plants retired or stopped operating in 2011 and 2012. Of the 16 in-state coal and pet coke plants that once operated in California, only two coal plants and one pet coke plant continued to operate in 2013, and the capacity of in-state coal-fired generation dropped almost 200 megawatts from 2012 to 2013.
If they'd make a Tesla that could climb this five months out of the year:
I'd buy one.
All my electricity comes from here:
I'd buy one.