If you mean the baby L-39, like this.I wonder what that sounds like!
If you mean the baby L-39, like this.I wonder what that sounds like!
Looks to be barely flying, way under powered.
Looks to be barely flying, way under powered.
For a breath of fresh air, take a look into how Mike Patey designed his wings
Zenith CH801. NOT a kitfox
The most hated airplane builder is back at it!
He's not going to make me look bad.I only fear he's going to make a smoking hole and make us all look bad.
I only fear he's going to make a smoking hole and make us all look bad.
Has he crossed any lines with the FARs? His testing requirements are in writing and he seems to be following them. The FAA is actually fairly good about striking the balance between letting people put their own lives at stake and regulating added safety for passengers. (See also aerobatic parachute requirements, night currency, and seat count restrictions for LSA or Basic Med.)+1 on the first half of your statement, but I'm not too worried about the second. He has left plenty of evidence of his processes. My only fear is he injures someone else. I've wondered how the FAA hasn't intervened in at least some respect with what he has shown in his videos, considering how easily they pursue Brian and other YouTubers of far less nefarious safety issues.
Has he crossed any lines with the FARs? His testing requirements are in writing and he seems to be following them. The FAA is actually fairly good about striking the balance between letting people put their own lives at stake and regulating added safety for passengers. (See also aerobatic parachute requirements, night currency, and seat count restrictions for LSA or Basic Med.)
This guy made a nice video about why Peter is such a moron and the most hated airplane builder!
Yes!Did Peter crap in your cornflakes or something?
That's two more engine swaps to make his 40 hours.
Delrin huh? Heavier parts you say?
Is Delrin typically used for high stress applications such as this?
The Google entry says applications include: “Vehicle: fuel sender unit, light/control stalk/combination switch (including shifter for light, turn signal), power windows, door lock systems, articulated shells.”
Serious question for any engineering-types here.
More Peter madness where he doesn't understand the cause/effect relationship. He failed the oil system and a bearing seized. A different bearing isn't the answer, a decent supply of oil is the answer. The original bearing was (presumably) fine until he puked all the oil. Just replace it.
As for delrin's suitability. Is this application a bearing application or an oil seal application? I probably wouldn't use delrin for either, but certainly not in a bearing application at 200+ degrees with any load on it.
Is Delrin typically used for high stress applications such as this?
The Google entry says applications include: “Vehicle: fuel sender unit, light/control stalk/combination switch (including shifter for light, turn signal), power windows, door lock systems, articulated shells.”
Serious question for any engineering-types here.
Impatience? Desperation? A deep sense of invulnerability?Where the **** does he get these ideas from?
Impatience? Desperation? A deep sense of invulnerability?
I have Delrin crash bungs on the motorcycle.
They are indeed. I doubt I'd use one in the internals of anything. They make good externals though.Which can best be described as “sacrificial”, right?
Not sure that’s what you’re going for in a bearing.
Which can best be described as “sacrificial”, right?
Not sure that’s what you’re going for in a bearing.