AcroGimp
Cleared for Takeoff
Controller: I know but this guy has no flying experience at all. He's a menace to himself and everything else in the air... yes, birds too.
Sometimes the law is wrong. I would challenge this one. Tell me how I go from being PIC to not being a PIC if the DPE departs the plane during the checkride. How does the "law" handle that.
**** the law anyway. The government is bankrupt.
By the way, off topic, but who is Lady Malibu? Firstly I'm offended to be confused for a woman (WTF!) But secondly, who is that? Is there a FAQ anywhere with all the back history?
Okay, good point, but still wrong because my checkride could be in conditions that are outside my solo endorsement conditions. How is that case handled then?
But very good point, I need to make sure my CFI adds some endorsement to my solo that puts me outside the envelope during my checkride.
In that 2nd photo, what Radio call do you think I might be making?
Okay, good point, but still wrong because my checkride could be in conditions that are outside my solo endorsement conditions. How is that case handled then?
But very good point, I need to make sure my CFI adds some endorsement to my solo that puts me outside the envelope during my checkride.
Both Ron and Bruce have been rather quiet on this thread. I brought it up before, but I keep wondering if we're getting spoofed from an insider...
**** the law anyway.
Okay, good point, but still wrong because my checkride could be in conditions that are outside my solo endorsement conditions. How is that case handled then?
But very good point, I need to make sure my CFI adds some endorsement to my solo that puts me outside the envelope during my checkride.
"Listen Betty, don't start up with your white zone sh*t again"?
An overhead break was mentioned -- so my money's on Honeck!
That is just so rude, I am speechless.
The way I see it, if it is not detected it did not happen. So for example, if I have a bloodtest and have 0 alcohol in my blood, it is irrelevant if I drank six hours earlier by myself. Nobody knows and it can never be proved. So if someone has a little help, for example cold medication, and nothing happens then it is totally acceptable.
Get off your high horse (or unicorn in your case).
That is just so rude, I am speechless.
The way I see it, if it is not detected it did not happen. So for example, if I have a bloodtest and have 0 alcohol in my blood, it is irrelevant if I drank six hours earlier by myself. Nobody knows and it can never be proved. So if someone has a little help, for example cold medication, and nothing happens then it is totally acceptable.
Get off your high horse (or unicorn in your case).
What endorsements would you suggest they give? All the endorsements available are listed in the FARs, please list them by reference title and number. (This is good practice for your oral)
What endorsements would you suggest they give? All the endorsements available are listed in the FARs, please list them by reference title and number. (This is good practice for your oral)
He said he'd fly circles around
Had wisdom to completely astound
When I fly through the sky, so happy and high
I wave to him down on the ground.
What solo endorsement conditions do you have? If the DPE is asking you to do stuff outside your solo conditions, or outside of the PTS, then you as the PIC have the responsibility to tell him no. There is nothing wring with telling the DPE no, under the right circumstances. He could be testing you. In my checkride, I had to prepare a flight plan to an airport north of Chicago. The day of the checkride, there was a TFR covering the airport. I know the DPE was testing me to see if I knew that. No doubt in my mind if we took off and went flying to it that he would have failed me.
AFaIK, a DPE can certainly ask you to do something that's not in the PTS, he just can't fail you for not doing it to his "standards". Of course if he asks you to do something you feel is unsafe your best option is to say that (he could be testing your ADM). But the applicant's "solo conditions" are completely irrelevant. The CFI has signed the candidate off for a checkride and that means the CFI believes the candidate is ready to become a licensed pilot with no "solo conditions".
While I still think the OP is a bit of a tool, and has some serious issues, from what he keeps posting it sounds like he had some serious deficiencies in his instruction. If this hasn't been suggested before, I think he should find another CFI/school to give him a mock checkride before he goes any further, and keep an open mind and closed mouth when doing it.
BestWe could do Haiku too
The checkride pete failed.
Biased and really unfair.
Take Drugs. Try again.
But it is not REALLY PIC, is it? I know they say that but if you were to analyze the situation legally, how is it possible for the student to be legally PIC without a certificate.
§ 61.47 Status of an examiner who is authorized by the Administrator to conduct practical tests.
(b) The examiner is not the pilot in command of the aircraft during the practical test
(c) Notwithstanding the type of aircraft used during the practical test, the applicant and the examiner (and any other occupants authorized to be on board by the examiner) are not subject to the requirements or limitations for the carriage of passengers that are specified in this chapter.
We could do Haiku too
The checkride pete failed.
Biased and really unfair.
Take Drugs. Try again.
I was never good at iambic pentameter...
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Pete failed his checkride,
He'll fail again, too.