Personal Financial advice for an elderly person

Let'sgoflying!

Touchdown! Greaser!
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
20,772
Location
west Texas
Display Name

Display name:
Dave Taylor
You are a 79yo widow, active and reasonably healthy. The insurance people with their actuarial tables think you have about 3 years left, but your genetics might allow you 20 more years; who knows what God's plan is?

You are in good financial shape. Between 3 retirement incomes which have ~zero % chance of failing, plus mortgage income and market investments, you are in doing well.... and are spending less than you are making.
However, you are concerned as everyone is. The markets have collapsed or dipped before. >79 is not an age you'd like to have your nest egg at risk.

You have your professional investment and financial advisor's advice. However you always have concern because they make most of their income when you make investments in the market. So there must be some bias on their part. And, why not ask around for advice - there are plenty of people smarter than you who when it comes to personal finances.
So I am asking here, for this person.

Cash, unless the dollar crashes or held in non-FDIC accounts, is a pretty safe place; although it is eaten up by inflation each year as it is not in a successful investment. She has ~5% of her net worth in cash right now.
(Yes, precious metals have the potential to protect against a dollar crash...but that is beyond what this person would consider.)
She has 35% of her net worth in real estate (15% as her home, 20% as a mortgages held on childrens' land) and has no desire to get into more real estate.
She has 60% of her net worth in the market. (2/3 mutual funds, the rest is half stocks, half bonds)
CDs are still not making 1% interest are they? They are almost as safe as cash I believe.
What is an annuity?
She has minimal life insurance, decent LTC insurance, good health insurance.
No significant liabilities.

Is any change in the proportionment of investment advised?
Your sage, and considered input is gratefully accepted.
 
You are a 79yo widow, active and reasonably healthy. The insurance people with their actuarial tables think you have about 3 years left, but your genetics might allow you 20 more years; who knows what God's plan is?

You are in good financial shape. Between 3 retirement incomes which have ~zero % chance of failing, plus mortgage income and market investments, you are in doing well.... and are spending less than you are making.
However, you are concerned as everyone is. The markets have collapsed or dipped before. >79 is not an age you'd like to have your nest egg at risk.

You have your professional investment and financial advisor's advice. However you always have concern because they make most of their income when you make investments in the market. So there must be some bias on their part. And, why not ask around for advice - there are plenty of people smarter than you who when it comes to personal finances.
So I am asking here, for this person.

Cash, unless the dollar crashes or held in non-FDIC accounts, is a pretty safe place; although it is eaten up by inflation each year as it is not in a successful investment. She has ~5% of her net worth in cash right now.
(Yes, precious metals have the potential to protect against a dollar crash...but that is beyond what this person would consider.)
She has 35% of her net worth in real estate (15% as her home, 20% as a mortgages held on childrens' land) and has no desire to get into more real estate.
She has 60% of her net worth in the market. (2/3 mutual funds, the rest is half stocks, half bonds)
CDs are still not making 1% interest are they? They are almost as safe as cash I believe.
What is an annuity?
She has minimal life insurance, decent LTC insurance, good health insurance.
No significant liabilities.

Is any change in the proportionment of investment advised?
Your sage, and considered input is gratefully accepted.

Some idea of how much money is involved here would help. 60% of her assets in the market is way too much for a 79 yo. There is a large correction coming, if not underway now, just too volatile for someone who needs income. My 2 cents, not a financial advisor.
 
See a fee only financial planner and ask their advice on what to do given the same set of facts.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
The real estate portion is suspect. Call me pessimistic but holding a mortgage on your kid's property is about as illiquid as it gets. There's no way she can convert them to cash unless she makes the children get their own mortgage and pay her off. She may as well consider those instruments as non-performing assets of no value. I would advise her to cash out of these "investments".

Her stock allocation is mighty strong for someone of her age. The type of mutual funds she holds are important. What are they? How will they perform in a declining market? She has to be careful about bond holdings too. Interest rates go up, the bond values go down.

An annuity is basically a life insurance product...you give them cash upfront and they guarantee a monthly payment for the rest of your life. The return is based on actuarial tables. The bad thing is the fees on annuities are exorbitant for what you are getting. The same thing can be accomplished in other ways with less expense.

I would consult a professional, and I would find one that will manage the account for 1-1.5% max. She should ask friends for recommendations...I'm sure she has acquaintances in similar situations.

And I'll say it again...she needs to get out of the mortgage business. She'll never see the principal of that money, just the monthly payments until she dies. Then the kids are off the hook for the rest. It's a bad deal for her. She should have that money in the bank and enjoy her final years. Spend some of it. She can't take it with her.
 
Last edited:
- lets say net worth is about 1.25M
- we have discussed the financial advisor separate from the investment advisor. Yes, a fee-based advisor; might well do this.
- re children and real estate. This was a situation where the children gave her a rate that was in excess of any mortgage rate that was available. The plus side for the children was that they knew mom was not going to immediately foreclose if they missed a payment (things continue to improve so missing payments is unlikely now); they are happy to provide her an investment income that is above market. Mom is thrilled that interest is going back into her accounts to be held as an inheritance for kids vs going to a mortgage company coffers. So I expect no change there on that basis. If the % of her investments in RE is considered excessive that would be a different and actionable thing. Kids would be ok getting out of the mortgage 'if they have to', as they can get a better rate elsewhere still.
Mom will never spend money on herself, way too frugal! Kids continue to promote the idea, though.
 
80% mutual funds (AMCPX/AMRMX/CWGIX/AMECX/LTRAX/NMBAX)
10% stocks (aapl/T/CVX/DRE/GSK/MFC/WRI/MMM)
2% bonds (2 municipal bonds)
 
Last edited:
She should be mostly (say ~70%) in all kinds of fixed income instruments (I am against annuities). There are special mutual funds that distribute your investment among such financial instruments. For example I own a 2015 Retirement Fund at T.RowPrice (for those who are planning to retire next year, there are similar funds 2000, 2005,2010, 2020,2025, etc). You can look up a make up of such fund to see how they spread out your $ - and they will be tweaking such fund depending on time to/from retirement.
 
I would consult a professional,
Good idea but I would hire an impartial CPA (on per hour basis) just to set things up, I wouldn't be paying 1-1.5% of my portfolio every year, with today's choices and proliferation of excellent managed funds designed for retirees I don't think such costly financial manager is necessary.
 
PM sent Dave Taylor. My fiance is a registered investment advisor in Texas and Oklahoma with 22 years experience. She loves to fly also and has 4 hours instruction in her log book. I would even fly her out to meet with you if needed. Would be a fun trip.

Joe
 
A fascinating thread and thank you Dave Taylor for the initial question. I keep an eye on my 87-year-old mother's financial well-being. She has a long time and much beloved Edward Jones financial advisor who I trust. However, I believe she has several annuities and what I'm reading here gives me pause. I will continue to watch this thread in order to learn more. Feel free to educate me directly. And a big howdy to Dave :)
 
A fascinating thread and thank you Dave Taylor for the initial question. I keep an eye on my 87-year-old mother's financial well-being. She has a long time and much beloved Edward Jones financial advisor who I trust. However, I believe she has several annuities and what I'm reading here gives me pause. I will continue to watch this thread in order to learn more. Feel free to educate me directly. And a big howdy to Dave :)

It's probably incredibly common, there is a conflict is that many of these people make money off their clients portfolio and if you put all of someones investments in low-risk things like someone her age should have then you no longer make much of anything off the account. Just a guess, I don't know anything about any of this :)
 
have then you no longer make much of anything off the account.
yes, but if you sell annuities you make a hefty commission up front even though the product you are selling is low-risk.
Few people really need annuities to begin with, but if you sat down with a CPA and decide upon number crunching that in your particular situation annuity is optimal then at least do yourself a favor and get a good deal, Vanguard for example sells annuities with no load fees and no ridiculous surrender charges. There is simply no excuse (besides ignorance) to get annuity that carries surrender charges.
 
Great thread, and good on you for watching out for her.
 
At 79, if she does have 1.2mil.... I'd start cashing things out and doing what ever is left on her bucket list. If nothing is on the bucket list, maybe help the grand kids out with college, or help with whatever American style debt her kids have gotten themselves into.

Ain't like she can take that money with her.

Better to die a little broke, but with no regrets, than with stacks of cash horded away and things you'd wished you'd done and seen. I have yet to hear anyone say on their death bed, that they wish they would have saved more money, or wished they HADN'T done something.
 
Good for her,go out and enjoy some of that money. The actuary table says ,should be good for at least another 7 years. Put some of the money into stocks that pay dividends.
 
My mom told me the other day she was holding money for us kids for when she dies. I told her to take what she was giving me and go live the rest of her life as she wants. At 81 she should enjoy what years she has left and not worry about what she leaves to others.

I want nothing.
 
Mom will never spend money on herself, way too frugal!
At some point in the future she might need to, though. It's not pleasant to talk about, but sometime in the future she might need long-term, full-time care. Unless someone in the family is willing to step up and provide it, it is very expensive. With those kinds of assets she isn't going to qualify for any type of assistance either.
 
At some point in the future she might need to, though. It's not pleasant to talk about, but sometime in the future she might need long-term, full-time care. Unless someone in the family is willing to step up and provide it, it is very expensive. With those kinds of assets she isn't going to qualify for any type of assistance either.

In the midst of this now with aging relative......... assisted living geared toward dementia, $8,500 per month, I understand nursing homes are in the area of $10,000+ per month.
 
Your sage ... input is gratefully accepted.
ROFL! I would submit that asking an internet forum for financial advice is about as good as asking at your high school class reunion. If you haven't seen my favorite cartoon, I'd suggest searching on "On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog."

First, congratulations to your mom and your family. It sounds like you have wonderful relationships on many levels -- far more important than money.

That said, I'll offer a couple of comments from the perspective of many years of successful investment experience:

First, there is an old rule: "For any complex problem there is a simple answer, usually wrong." I am thinking here of the preposterous idea that asset allocation should be based solely on age. There is wisdom in allocating a large fraction to fixed income where the person has limited assets and the portfolio is basically intended to last only his/her lifetime. This reduces the likelihood that the person must sell equity assets into a down market in order to live. But where the investment portfolio is large relative to the person's needs and intended to outlive its owner, asset allocation is a whole different game. For your mom, 60% equities is not wildly out of line.

Second, your mom's equity portfolio is invested in a bunch of fairly poor-performing, actively managed, funds. This is pretty typical of what a "professional investment advisor" provides in exchange for a wrap fee of 1-2%. Basically, this scenario provides a 60-90% probability that your mom's portfolio will underperform the market by around 2-3%. Said another way, the vast majority of "professional managers" underperform their benchmarks, essentially subtracting value from the portfolios they manage. Advisors who charge a fee, then delegate the heavy lifting to others who also charge a fee are, IMHO, the worst. There is a mountain of academic research that backs up what I am saying here. Your "professional investment advisor" is probably costing your mom $10-20K per year.

Here are some links:

http://www.economist.com/news/finan...ers-dont-beat-market-practice-makes-imperfect (easy reading)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2014/01/13/coin-flipping-outdoes-active-fund-managers/ (easy reading)

http://web.stanford.edu/~wfsharpe/art/active/active.htm (slightly mathematical and spare, from a Nobel Prize winner)

Depending on your interest level, you might also look at these:

http://us.spindices.com/resource-center/thought-leadership/spiva/ -- both the “SPIVA” and the “Persistence Scorecard.” (easy reading summaries, though somewhat arcane data tables)

Searches with keywords like “active investment manager performance” and “active investment manager persistence” will lead you to more academic research.

(I have all this handy because I prepared it a couple of weeks ago to present to the investment committee of a nonprofit that I serve on.)

Re annuities, run, don't walk away. This is an investment designed to be sold the gullible by the unprincipled, who reap huge commissions from it. There are rare exceptions, but that is the general rule.

OK, so maybe I am not a dog on the internet. Or maybe I am. If you want to PM me I'd be happy to talk with you on the phone. I don't sell anything, have never been paid a dime for investment advice, and my girlfriend doesn't sell anything either. (Actually I don't even have a girlfriend.)
 
Dave, I can't and won't give any specific advice for your friend regarding investments primarily because I just don't know enough about what is appropriate or not but I will say this; Financial Advisors and Planners are like Vets, Lawyers, Plumbers and Builders, there are good ones and not so good ones. Reputation is everything in the service business and that's how I'd pick. They have a right to earn a fee, you should just know what it is and how its determined.

Second, The one recommendation that I will make is that she consult with an elder law attorney. There are so many state and federal issues that can impact her estate, ability to get good long term care and her taxes that a misstep could cost her or her heirs ( if she cares about that) a lot of money. Its well worth the cost for a consultation.
 
The one recommendation that I will make is that she consult with an elder law attorney. There are so many state and federal issues that can impact her estate, ability to get good long term care and her taxes that a misstep could cost her or her heirs ( if she cares about that) a lot of money. Its well worth the cost for a consultation.
+1 :thumbsup:
 
Thanks for the input. Only comment I have time for is; this is not my mom. (She left us 20 years ago.)
 
Continues to be fascinating and, some of what I'm reading is disturbing. Our Edward Jones agent has been a dream to work with and she was trusted implicitly by my deceased step father who had served 2 terms as state treasurer! He knew his business and was political pals with our agents father. They are practically family! But, I know my mom has annuities so now I'm suspicious! Our ignorance makes us so vulnerable.
 
I recommend John Bogle's books on investing. If you read "Common Sense on Investing" it might make sense for her to consider Vanguard's low cost mutual funds. At age 79 Bogle's recommendation is 79 percent Bonds or Bond funds and 21 percent Stocks or stock funds. (Have your age in Bonds, the rest stocks. )

I have some Vanguard funds but I am not employed by them, nor do I get anything from recommending them. The nice thing about Vanguard funds is that the fees tend to be pretty low and the funds tend to be good ones.
 
It's probably incredibly common, there is a conflict is that many of these people make money off their clients portfolio and if you put all of someones investments in low-risk things like someone her age should have then you no longer make much of anything off the account. Just a guess, I don't know anything about any of this :)
yes, but if you sell annuities you make a hefty commission up front even though the product you are selling is low-risk.
That ship has already sailed somewhat. If the mutual fund ticker symbols listed above are the actual ones held, they're all Class A shares. The first four had 5.75% up front sales charges, and the last two had 2.25% and 3%, respectively. That's how the broker made his money.
 
The real estate portion is suspect. Call me pessimistic but holding a mortgage on your kid's property is about as illiquid as it gets. There's no way she can convert them to cash unless she makes the children get their own mortgage and pay her off. She may as well consider those instruments as non-performing assets of no value. I would advise her to cash out of these "investments".
.........

And I'll say it again...she needs to get out of the mortgage business. She'll never see the principal of that money, just the monthly payments until she dies. Then the kids are off the hook for the rest. It's a bad deal for her. She should have that money in the bank and enjoy her final years. Spend some of it. She can't take it with her.

I disagree. 20% of a $1.2m portfolio does not sound excessive. It is above market rate and provides current income. The principal portion of the payment is tax free, unless there is some capital gain being realized. There is not enough info in the OP to tell if that is the case. I'm also assuming this is not an interest-only loan; again the OP does not say.

When my mother sold the farm where I grew up she carried the note. When she died my brother, sister, and I formed a partnership to hold the note and distribute the income to each of us. We don't know why the buyers have never refinanced, because the interest rate is 6.5%. The monthly income is basically my flying money. Only problem is it is only a 15 yr mortgage, and will be paid off in less than 2 years. :sad:
 
27 posts in and I have yet to see this question:

What does this person want?

What are her goals with her money? And most importantly, is she looking for advice? :)

You say her 3 incomes are plenty to live off of. If that's the case, there's a whole range of things she can do with her nest egg.
 
Goals:
Avoid any changes in life including financial independence.
Preserve nest egg.
If possible, provide an inheritance.

Yes she seeks advice, this is not my idea.

The loans to children have no capital gains taxes.
I am not sure what an 'interest-only' loan is but each month there are payments of principal and interest. The interest is taxable income.
If she predeceases the term of the loans, any owed amounts are deducted from that child's inheritance.

The suggestion to seek further professional advice (elder tax attorney, fee-based financial advisor not selling instruments) has been made.

I am not sure why the resistance to seeking advice from friends, on the internet or in person. I think this is a common practice that has helped many people when done with care. Oh well.
 
80% mutual funds (AMCPX/AMRMX/CWGIX/AMECX/LTRAX/NMBAX)
10% stocks (aapl/T/CVX/DRE/GSK/MFC/WRI/MMM)
2% bonds (2 municipal bonds)

I am told the mutual funds above are actually comprised of a considerable proportion of bonds. 'A bond as part of a mutual fund.'
So her distribution is actually more towards bonds than it appears.
 
That ship has already sailed somewhat. If the mutual fund ticker symbols listed above are the actual ones held, they're all Class A shares. The first four had 5.75% up front sales charges, and the last two had 2.25% and 3%, respectively. That's how the broker made his money.
Ack! Good catch, Rich. I looked up the funds but just to see performance. I'm embarrassed for not doing my homework completely. I guess it just never occurred to me that in this day and age anyone would still have the cojones to sell funds with big loads. That's another $20-30K flushed down the toilet. This "investment advisor" should be dropped like a hot rock.

Dave: Re any financial advisor, there is a critical question: "Are you a fiduciary?" The answer must be "Yes."

Re seeking advice on the internet, I'll submit that it is fundamentally different that seeking advice from friends or in person. The reason is anonymity. You wouldn't seek advice from a friend who had multiple bankruptcies and had never managed any money at all. On the internet, that might be exactly who is posting. So, yes, proceed "with care" because the anonymity of the internet makes it fundamentally different.
 
So I have a fee based guy that I trust and I was commenting that 60% in the market seems high, but maybe it's not that bad. I have a relatively high concentration of bonds for income countered by stocks for growth. Over the past year we have been changing that mix as my guy feels that bonds are going to take a nose dive when interest rates go up. My feeling is that the market is buoyed now by QE which will probably start winding down after the election. We are in for a large correction, so our strategy will be to move the balance to stocks for income rather than the bonds whose prices will become depressed. Our goal has been rock solid (if such a thing exists) stocks that generate income and are hopefully able to keep their value relative to the market. The downside of this strategy is that I will be paying more taxes. YMMV.
 
In the midst of this now with aging relative......... assisted living geared toward dementia, $8,500 per month, I understand nursing homes are in the area of $10,000+ per month.

I've been lurking recently so decided to register so I could add my 2 cents on this aspect of end-of-life investments/scenarios. I went through it three years ago with my mom so am rich with recent experience. My 84 year old mom had a series of strokes related to dementia - the same dementia that prompted her to invest all her savings (over half a million) in Las Vegas REITs.

Although her financial advice came from her equally addled neighbors in the retirement community where she lived, she did do some things right. She had a trust and a will. She had an Advance Directive. She had LTC and supplementary medical insurance. We weren't close but although she had named several executors in attempts to buy "friends," the one with my name on it was the only one that was notarized. When the very unexpected call came I got to learn a whole lot about subjects I had no previous knowledge of.

Someone on the thread mentioned how their mom spent her last years or months in a vegetative state in a nursing home. They call those places "vent farms" here in California - I suppose everywhere. When my mom started having strokes and I got called in I had the opportunity to see these places - acute care, sub-acute care, hospice care, hospital care . . . you name it. They are all nightmares. The nicest thing you can do for anyone is to keep them out of these places. At best they are spacious motel-like facilities with fancy facades and smooth talking administrators and at worst they are smelly, noisy warrens with halls lines with people hanging out of their wheelchairs. The latter is the norm.

They are all expensive. Anywhere from 6K to 10K per month and up.

Before I get carried away and write a book I'll cut to the chase with my "two cents."

Number one is to get the person back home - either their own home or yours. Build another bedroom onto your place if you have to - it'll be cheaper than keeping them in some godawful facility.

Hire an RN or LVN on a live-in basis. Using my mom's LTC I paid $100/day. There are plenty of nurses out there who are looking, for a variety of reasons, for just this sort of situation. Don't use a nursing agency - although you'll be tempted. The agencies, medical supply houses, etc. are all just part of the machine. The nurse will need one day off a week plus other breaks so you'll figure that out along with them. Online (eBay, Craigslist, etc.) you can buy constant-pressure air beds, oxygen, feed pumps, medical food, monitors, wheelchairs - all medical equipment you can imagine and some you can't - for a small fraction of what the medical supply companies will charge you. LTC and Medicare will pay for some or all of these things but why contribute to the incredible gouging that goes on? The entire medical "system" is unbelievably inflated. When someone dies at home or private care all the items I mention above get put out for sale for next to nothing since the people selling them didn't pay anything for them in the first place.

Anyway, get the person home. They may have lost their ability to talk but what consciousness still in there has to prefer being among familiar things and people and their pets. I brought my mom home not to live like a vegetable but because after 84 years of being self-sufficient I didn't want her to die in a noisy, smelly "facility" surrounded by people speaking Tagalog.

Long term care insurance and the supplementary-to-Medicare insurance along with Medicare itself will pay for doctor visits, rehab nurses that come in several times a week, ambulance transportation, and medications. Post the Advance Directive on the bedroom door so everyone, especially the nurse(s) you've hired, knows there will be an end to it all when the time comes . . . when Morphous comes to call. Nobody wants to live like a vegetable - it's worse than just being a passive carrot or potato and fading away gently. Oh no. You need to be "turned" every four to six hours so you don't develop bed sores - interrupting whatever dream or peaceful state one might have temporarily attained. You get a catheter stuck into you and a feeding tube stuck into the receptacle implanted into your stomach. Another implant into your arm receives medications & fluids of various kinds. Even if you can breathe on your own you still get an O2 cannula stuck up your nose. You have to have your diapers changed frequently. Also bedding. There's an endless list of 24-hours per day indignities to be suffered by anyone in this predicament. I don't think anyone is so attached to life that living like this can bring any joy. Once one has reached the "vegetative" state it is time to make them comfortable and give them time to process their memories and to say goodbye to whoever and whatever was important to them.

I kept my mom in this situation, in her own bedroom in her own house with her cats and familiar surroundings, for six months. Looking back I realized that was about three months too long but there were improvements during that time which made it easier to just keep going than to call it all off. In my own example I had the great good fortune to hire a new nurse who had just the right experience and skills. She knew that many people will not let themselves die naturally no matter how uncomfortable life might have gotten. They need "permission" to let go. It's common. I never knew anything about it and in my case it wouldn't have worked for me to try and give my mom "permission" for anything. The nurse however was believable and trustworthy apparently since during the night following "the talk" my mom passed away very gently and gradually and had a heart beat of 2 BPM in the morning.

I didn't know anything about end of life scenarios and what's involved but fortunately my life allows me plenty of time to learn whatever I need to know. I think most people abandon their loved ones (or even their not-so-loved ones, as in my case) to the feeding-frenzy medical system because they don't have time to learn what is necessary to bypass or avoid most of it. It's really awful - take a tour of your local care facility and just imagine being there 24 hours a day with the smells, the constant beeping of patients trying to summon nurses who are out back taking a smoke break or just ignoring the calls since they never end . . . yet the care facilities in all their many names are bursting at the seams they're so full. I would think, speaking of financial investments, that an investment in "care facilities" would be one of the most secure and profitable investments available. We baby boomers are dropping like flies and surviving relatives often foolishly just "go with the system" whether it's because of lack of time to figure out how it works (so we can consider alternatives) or because we are just too brainwashed by people in white coats to look into it. The "system" has a powerful momentum to it.

One pitfall it's extremely important to know about. If anyone steps into the cow paddy called Medicaid (called Medi-Cal here in CA) it's all over financially for whatever estate was left. The insane bloated billing that goes on together with the fact they (the government) will come back after it's all over and take every asset that's retrievable will utterly ruin any carefully laid-out investment plans made prior to involvement with Medicaid or Medi-Cal. The SNF's and other agencies LOVE that government money and will encourage you at every step to use Medicaid even if you don't need it. That was always kind of a mystery to me but surely has a lot to do with the money they make. They're very profitable so they clearly know what they're doing :rolleyes:.

Mike
KSEE
 
Last edited:
Back
Top