JeffDG
Touchdown! Greaser!
non-sequiturs........let
Three to denote missing or deleted text within a paragraph. Four to denote missing or deleted text across multiple paragraphs.
What does 8 (eight) denote?
non-sequiturs........let
Three to denote missing or deleted text within a paragraph. Four to denote missing or deleted text across multiple paragraphs.
Three to denote missing or deleted text within a paragraph. Four to denote missing or deleted text across multiple paragraphs.
Look at the brains on Brad!
Man, caught in my own game. I don't get the reference.![]()
...and I'm pretty sure it only takes three dots to denote missing or deleted text.![]()
Man, caught in my own game. I don't get the reference.![]()
I'd feel better, I think, if my mind were to be loose than if I were to lose my mind.
Because you forgot to add the "u".![]()
irregardless of all the joking around on this thread......
![]()
This is just the sort of thing that will make you loose your mind.....![]()
irregardless of all the joking around on this thread......
![]()
I love hearing words turned into verbs that aren't: like, we're going to incentivize our folks.
I love hearing words turned into verbs that aren't: like, we're going to incentivize our folks.
Or unrequested "advice", if you will!My unrequested advise?
If you can, let it go.
Spelling, grammar, syntax, apostrophes in the wrong place, improper idioms, inappropriate analogies, agonizing non-sequiturs........let em' all go!
I could list a half dozen reasons why; suffice it to say its going to be better in the long run if we are all able to tolerate!
Or unrequested "advice", if you will!![]()
Or unrequested "advice", if you will!![]()
My pet peeve is apostrophes before the "s" when making things plural. Or would that be "making thing's plural"?
There are official stylebooks that govern that sort of thing. Sometimes they belong inside, sometimes outside. Depends on the usage and, to some extent, the stylebook in question.And then there are the people who put periods and commas ouside the quotation marks.
Verbing wierds nouns.
Just because someone CAN do something does not mean you should force them to do so continuously.The Human Brain will interpret words just as long as the first and last letter are the same.
...snip...
So is spelling really that important?
There are official stylebooks that govern that sort of thing. Sometimes they belong inside, sometimes outside. Depends on the usage and, to some extent, the stylebook in question.
Signed,
23 years an editor
In standard American practice, commas are placed inside quotation marks:
I spent the morning reading Faulkner’s “Barn Burning,” which seemed to be about a pyromaniac.Periods are also normally placed inside quotation marks (with the exception of terms being defined, see above). Colons and semicolons, however, are preceded by quotation marks.
Or unrequested "advice", if you will!
My pet peeve is apostrophes before the "s" when making things plural. Or would that be "making thing's plural"?
Just because someone CAN do something does not mean you should force them to do so continuously.
If something is worth doing, it's worth doing right.
Just because someone CAN do something does not mean you should force them to do so continuously.
If something is worth doing, it's worth doing right.
Just because someone CAN do something does not mean you should force them to do so continuously.
If something is worth doing, it's worth doing right.
I actually use that one when I care slightly about something, but not much. Just to see who it bothers."I could care less"
Do people realize they're saying the exact opposite of what they mean when they say this? Guess it's easier to say "could" than "couldn't". Dern double consonants...must also be why people say "nucular".
Here's a perfect example of why I kept wanting to use "which" instead of "that":
On Windows 7, blah, blah, blah, and blah happened. On XP, the only part of that which I could reproduce was the third blah.
The alternative is to say "that that". I hate saying "that that".
I think that that is not the only alternative:
On XP, the only part that I could reproduce was the third blah.
On XP, the only part of those that I could reproduce was the third blah.
On XP, only the third part can be reproduced.
On XP, blah happens. On Windows 7, blah and blah also occur.