Warmi
Line Up and Wait
Pretty much the same at MSL..MOSAIC is CAS, not IAS. What is the CAS at 58 IAS?
Pretty much the same at MSL..MOSAIC is CAS, not IAS. What is the CAS at 58 IAS?
edit:
Some models of Cessna 172 appears to squeak in by 1 knot other models do not. A more careful look is required...
It really depends on a plane - some planes were designed to higher gross and then designated and sold as LSA on the US market at 1320lbs gross - while not legal at least it would be reasonably sane to treat their gross as “just a suggestion” but if the plane was designed to 1320 lbs or so then that’s that.how is this all calculated? I don’t understand. I guess what I really want to know is if the artificial 1320 limit is going to be recalculated by a new formula or if the manufacturer will have it issue a change. From what I’ve seen, the 1320 limit is usually treated as “just a suggestion” by a lot of pilots, seeing what they haul into air shows.
As written, this has the potential to save a lot of orphaned airplanes.From what I can see, for airplanes the stall speed is going to effectively be the single limiting factor. If VS1 is that low, then it's going to meet all of the other criteria -- max number of seats, cruise speed, etc.
I know this is my disappointment with what happened with Basic Med raising its head, but I can't shake the feeling that after the comment period the max VS1 will get bumped down just enough to exclude 99% of the gains here... leaving us with slightly heavier variants of Champs, Chiefs, and Cubs. But that's just me being pessimistic.
I imagine they will not be the only ones. Several factory built LSA''s were shoehorned down slightly to meet the LSA/EASA rules.The Vashon Ranger will go up to 1500 lbs as soon as the rule is in effect (per them, I asked about it.)
As written, this has the potential to save a lot of orphaned airplanes.From what I can see, for airplanes the stall speed is going to effectively be the single limiting factor. If VS1 is that low, then it's going to meet all of the other criteria -- max number of seats, cruise speed, etc.
I know this is my disappointment with what happened with Basic Med raising its head, but I can't shake the feeling that after the comment period the max VS1 will get bumped down just enough to exclude 99% of the gains here... leaving us with slightly heavier variants of Champs, Chiefs, and Cubs. But that's just me being pessimistic.
This is going to breath new life into some lower end airplanes like the Traumahawk, Beech Skipper and Sundowner, both Commander Models Lark and Darter.Perusing my collection of POH, DA40 made the cut but C177, AA5B, SR20 and M20 do not.
I expect many of them to do that. There are a bunch of modern LSAs out there that can handle far more than the current regulatory 1320.The Vashon Ranger will go up to 1500 lbs as soon as the rule is in effect (per them, I asked about it.)
a paper regulatory change in weight doesn't not increase either useful load or structural integrity. It has to be the manufacturer changing limitations.how is this all calculated? I don’t understand. I guess what I really want to know is if the artificial 1320 limit is going to be recalculated by a new formula or if the manufacturer will have it issue a change. From what I’ve seen, the 1320 limit is usually treated as “just a suggestion” by a lot of pilots, seeing what they haul into air shows.
Notice that the table converts IAS to/from TIAS. I’m thinking that TIAS is an older term for CAS, not true airspeed.There is a correction table, but it's indicated vs true. On yours, I'd go with sea level True as more likely right there with calibrated. Not that it matters at those speeds.
View attachment 119159
Hey folks,
I think one critical aspect of the rule is if you can modify existing designs to get them to meet these new criteria as sport pilot eligible aircraft. Lots of existing aircraft have access to various STC based modifications that can get the vs1 calibrated down to these requirements. Unfortunately, you were not able to do this with the initial sport pilot rule - folks tried to lower the gross weight of Cessna 120s and 140s by STC to conform to sport pilot and the FAA nixed that.
Lots of planes are going to be within 3 or 4 knots of the rule - VGs for example can significantly lower these speeds through STC kits.
61.316 (a)"[...] you may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that, since its original certification, meets the following requirements:"From what I can see, it looks like SPs can fly any 4 seat or less aircraft with 54 knots or less stall speed. The part about the aircraft continuously meeting the LSA limits since new seems to have gone away along with the Part 1.1 definition of light-sport aircraft.
Stall reducing STCs might become a profitable business for awhile...
One would assume that the stall speed would be measured by flight testing. (There is no gross weight limit in the new rules.)how is this all calculated? I don’t understand. I guess what I really want to know is if the artificial 1320 limit is going to be recalculated by a new formula or if the manufacturer will have it issue a change. From what I’ve seen, the 1320 limit is usually treated as “just a suggestion” by a lot of pilots, seeing what they haul into air shows.
Right, I missed that. Really a stupid requirement (send those comments in!).61.316 (a)"[...] you may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that, since its original certification, meets the following requirements:"
Geoff "Wet Blanket" Thorpe.
Notice that the table converts IAS to/from TIAS. I’m thinking that TIAS is an older term for CAS, not true airspeed.
Pretty much the same at MSL..
Oh, okay. I thought by what you said about the 172 that you pulled out some formula that I just couldn’t see in the regs. Glad to know I can still read. Tnx.It really depends on a plane - some planes were designed to higher gross and then designated and sold as LSA on the US market at 1320lbs gross - while not legal at least it would be reasonably sane to treat their gross as “just a suggestion” but if the plane was designed to 1320 lbs or so then that’s that.
Exceeding the manufacturers recommended maximum weight is not that uncommon - and not just limited to LSAs. Not necessarily a good idea, but it happens. And yes, for, say, a 172, flying heavier than gross could push the actual stall speed over yea olde 54 knot CAS. I guess some pilots are just bad people.
Presumably, you could increase the gross on something like the Jabaru to match the European number - but I have no idea what kind of paperwork that would involve. For an E-AB (say, a SeaRey) I would assume that it would be considered a major alteration and you would go back into phase 1. But for S-LSA or E-LSA the FAA has separated out the requirements for certificating the aircraft from the definition of what a Light and Sporty Guy can fly, and I have not looked into those details (which are likely to change by the time the rule comes out for real).I was thinking about planes like the Jabaru, in particular. the J is sold as an LSA in the US but a 3 place plane in Australia. For the US market they took the backseat out, which leaves a baggage area big enough to sublet as an apartment.
Just trying to look up stall speeds for 172s - there appears to be some variation based on model, but some of that may be due to IAS vs CAS? Changes in gross weight? Just bad information on the web?Oh, okay. I thought by what you said about the 172 that you pulled out some formula that I just couldn’t see in the regs. Glad to know I can still read. Tnx.
Bring lots of cash..Yep... Apologies to flying club members with a PPL, but I am coming for your Cessnas. And there's nothing that can stop me
(except a multi-year waiting list and voting approval from 2/3 of the current membership)
My ride is (per the kit manufacturer) 1300 gross on wheels, 1400ish on floats. So one would think that the wings are not going to fall of at 1400 pounds. Assuming that Mosaic is actually similar to what is proposed and is implemented in my lifetime - To do, or not to do, that is the question.if the plane was designed to 1320 lbs or so then that’s that.
Crap....VS1 on my cherokee 180 is 58 kts.As currently proposed, the weight limit is replaced with:
"A maximum stalling speed or minimum steady flight speed without the use of
lift-enhancing devices (VS1) [...] for airplanes, which
must have a VS1 speed of not more than 54 knots CAS at the aircraft’s maximum
certificated takeoff weight and most critical center of gravity."
Which may or may not correspond to about 3000 pounds.
Wing area will have a big impact on weight vs. stall speed.
edit:
Some models of Cessna 172 appears to squeak in by 1 knot other models do not. A more careful look is required...
I was thinking the market price for RV-9s may rise.Well, the RV vs Zenith decision just got much easier.
Now, where to build....
I was thinking the market price for RV-9s may rise.
Seems to me RV-7s etc may be right on the edge but Vans doesn't publish the no-flap stall speed.
What year? Mph or kts?Crap....VS1 on my cherokee 180 is 58 kts.
That's why you can have a 100% stock Taylorcraft, but it's not legal because someone back in the day put a Beech Roby in-flight adjustable prop on it even though it's looooong gone. Ask me how I know.61.316 (a)"[...] you may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that, since its original certification, meets the following requirements:"
Geoff "Wet Blanket" Thorpe.
That changes the landing procedure but does not change the "maximum stalling speed or minimum steady flight speed without the use of lift-enhancing devices (VS1)".I suppose you could write the aoh to prohibit landings without flaps, so Vso is 50.
Vans doesn't publish the no-flap stall speed.
180D, 1969, 58 ktsWhat year? Mph or kts?
Is VS1 power on or power off?How many planes with a stall speed that low will hit 250kts?
My guess is that Van's will soon publish the clean stall speed and that they will qualify ...Seems to me RV-7s etc may be right on the edge but Vans doesn't publish the no-flap stall speed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it makes a difference. Vs1 is just in clean configuration.Is VS1 power on or power off?
No, not enough said there. What makes a CFI-SP unqualified to teach in the expanded envelope, and what makes a CFI not a CFI?Sport pilot instructors should not be teaching outside of traditional sport pilot aircraft - enough said there - if they want to teach at a higher level they should become CFIs.
From a numbers perspective, there can be a significant difference. The difference is close to 5 knots in my RV-10.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it makes a difference. Vs1 is just in clean configuration.