You don’t know how google maps works I guess.I know that Mooney. I think I've an inkling of what was going on, and someone's going to have a bad day.
Why would I?You don’t know how google maps works I guess.
Hint: it’s not a live satellite feed.Why would I?
Given the facts of orbital mechanics that isn't exactly a big surprise. I suppose I should have said "someone likely had a bad day". Sad thing is I suspect that Mooney will be a write-off, and there'll be one less in the fleet.Hint: it’s not a live satellite feed.
Note that I don't find anything in the NTSB database on it, but a lot of gear-up landings don't make it there.I know that Mooney. I think I've an inkling of what was going on, and someone's going to have a bad day.
Yeah, the real question is did it gear up from operator error or mechanical mishap. I suspect the former. Then again, for all I know what happened in that photograph is why I saw it in that shop in the first place.Note that I don't find anything in the NTSB database on it, but a lot of gear-up landings don't make it there.
Orbital mechanics isn't the half of it. The images come down and then have to be orthorectified and further messaged into google's database.Given the facts of orbital mechanics that isn't exactly a big surprise. I suppose I should have said "someone likely had a bad day". Sad thing is I suspect that Mooney will be a write-off, and there'll be one less in the fleet.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<kml xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2" xmlns:gx="http://www.google.com/kml/ext/2.2" xmlns:kml="http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<Document>
<name>~GEiHS3OH.kmz</name>
<Style id="s_ylw-pushpin_hl">
<IconStyle>
<scale>1.3</scale>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pushpin/ylw-pushpin.png</href>
</Icon>
<hotSpot x="20" y="2" xunits="pixels" yunits="pixels"/>
</IconStyle>
</Style>
<Style id="s_ylw-pushpin">
<IconStyle>
<scale>1.1</scale>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pushpin/ylw-pushpin.png</href>
</Icon>
<hotSpot x="20" y="2" xunits="pixels" yunits="pixels"/>
</IconStyle>
</Style>
<StyleMap id="m_ylw-pushpin">
<Pair>
<key>normal</key>
<styleUrl>#s_ylw-pushpin</styleUrl>
</Pair>
<Pair>
<key>highlight</key>
<styleUrl>#s_ylw-pushpin_hl</styleUrl>
</Pair>
</StyleMap>
<Placemark>
<name>Grob 103 April 20 2017</name>
<LookAt>
<gx:TimeStamp><when>2017-04-21</when>
</gx:TimeStamp>
<gx:ViewerOptions>
<gx:option name="historicalimagery"></gx:option>
<gx:option enabled="0" name="sunlight"></gx:option>
<gx:option enabled="0" name="streetview"></gx:option>
</gx:ViewerOptions>
<longitude>-112.1539694762611</longitude>
<latitude>33.08852992646245</latitude>
<altitude>0</altitude>
<heading>0.3301969078399211</heading>
<tilt>29.55915199793984</tilt>
<range>265.6172470863569</range>
<gx:altitudeMode>relativeToSeaFloor</gx:altitudeMode>
</LookAt>
<styleUrl>#m_ylw-pushpin</styleUrl>
<Point>
<gx:drawOrder>1</gx:drawOrder>
<coordinates>-112.153862182327,33.08861766122565,0</coordinates>
</Point>
</Placemark>
</Document>
</kml>
Depends where you are and when the picture is taken but most of it these days is the old EarthWatch (the company name has changed over the years: DigitalGlobe, Radiant, Maxar), with some backfill from Landsat,.i thought most or all of those map images weren't satellite data at all, but aerial photo work originally sourced by the local authorities for mapping and planning purposes (city, county, etc..) and then stitched together by google. Maybe the lower resolution rural stuff is orbital(?)
Motion artifacts I think.And, then you wonder what was going on here.....
https://www.google.com/maps/@48.1551074,-122.1546111,138m/data=!3m1!1e3
Motion artifacts I think.
This is what I see when I click on that link. Am I missing something?And, then you wonder what was going on here.....
https://www.google.com/maps/@48.1551074,-122.1546111,138m/data=!3m1!1e3
This is what I see when I click on that link. Am I missing something?
Actually, I've been told its the result of "stitching" different still photographs together. The photos were shot at different times, then assembled by computer processing software. The resulting image is a "composite" of 2 or more images.
Still, it looks like the 2 aircraft in the lower, right part of the warm up area are impossibly close to each other. A good reason to follow Dr. Tarr's advice and "only believe 1/2 that which you see."
So Jim, did this happen before or after my little avionics adventure? i.e. was it sitting in the hangar from the pictured incident, or was this after? I seem to recall something about a gear up. Don't recall if the aircraft had a J-bar or electric gear.I was there when that happened...it was one of our local denizens (It was Charlie, Steingar). Gear wouldn't come down, perfect landing on the center of the runway. After cleared by the FAA, we all helped jack it up and hauled it away. Don't think it's back in the air yet.
Jim
Oh.....FAA said it was an incident...
So Jim, did this happen before or after my little avionics adventure? i.e. was it sitting in the hangar from the pictured incident, or was this after? I seem to recall something about a gear up. Don't recall if the aircraft had a J-bar or electric gear.
And if you see Doug, you can tell him that all the stuff he put in my aircraft is actually working flawlessly. Took a long solo flight the UP to figure out how to work it all, though.
Doug is working out of his truck!? What happened? Last I saw he was up to antlers in busted airplanes!It was post-your-internment Electric gear... Doug is back working out of his truck, but doing work on the airport. I still have the extra KLN94 from the R182, if you want a back-up. Screen's not perfect, but working great when pulled out.
That's weird, mine looks like this (and I've circled myself, flying VFR, while all those other guys are IFR and are either getting their clearance or waiting for release):
View attachment 81746