Lndwarrior
Cleared for Takeoff
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,330
- Display Name
Display name:
Gary
It just keeps getting more interesting.
Landing on Mars in 3 days.
Landing on Mars in 3 days.
That's not flying. That's just falling, with style. (someone had the camera upside down)I guess this was just a touch and go.....with a looong touch....
I guess this was just a touch and go.....with a looong touch....
I guess this was just a touch and go.....with a looong touch....
And did anyone ever go back and get the cameraman.??
Actually I have found space travel and exploration exciting ever since I was a little kid. That hasn't ever left me.
1) The ultra violet rays would have turned the American flag to white. Does that mean we have surrendered on the Moon?
Well, maybe terrestrial telescopes, but Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter took a photo of Surveyor 1 on the lunar surface.Couple of interesting facts:
1) The ultra violet rays would have turned the American flag to white. Does that mean we have surrendered on the Moon?
2) We have yet to build a telescope with enough resolution to see the stuff we left behind.
Well, maybe terrestrial telescopes, but Lunar Orbiter took a photo of Surveyor 1 on the lunar surface.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/lroc_20090930_surveyor1.html
I had this same vid teed up to post and then realized that technically the moon isn't a planet.
I guess this was just a touch and go.....with a looong touch....
And did anyone ever go back and get the cameraman.??
Actually I have found space travel and exploration exciting ever since I was a little kid. That hasn't ever left me.
I had this same vid teed up to post and then realized that technically the moon isn't a planet.
For additional geeking out, there's the "Making Tracks on Mars" show on Smithsonian Channel...starts tomorrow. Also, Mission to Mars AR app, which looks interesting. Haven't downloaded it, but looks like a slow afternoon, so...
I and nearly 11 million of my closest friends have our names stenciled by electron beam on three silicon wafers aboard the Perseverance, so I'm there in both spirit and name!
Here we are:
send-your-name-placard-attached-to-perseverance
Yes, if one accepts the earth-centric view of things. As most of us do.
The moon is big enough, relative to earth, that a neutral observer--like the Martians who will soon have to hide from yet another rover --would look at us and consider Terra and Luna to be a binary planetary system: two planets, orbiting each other, while the binary system also orbits the sun.
The IAU would probably disagree.
Besides, the moon orbits the earth (unless I'm mistaken, the barycenter of the earth/moon is below the surface of the earth)
The photo shows an object and at the coordinates of Surveyor 1, and that's about it. It will be stunning to one day see a more detailed image of the stuff Apollo left behind.
Apollo 11 landing site (decent stage, etc.)
I just googled Apollo 11 landing siteexcellent, where on the net can I find this pic and ones like it?
Assuming the telescope is on earth, or near-earth orbit, that will be a huge telescope. Just to see the lunar lander would need a telescope with an aperture of around 25 meters. The largest optical telescope I know of is Gran Telescopio Canarias in Spain with an effective Aperture of 10.4 meters. The Large Binocular telescope in Arizona has an effective resolution of a single 23 meter telescope ( two 2.8 meter mirrors, 14 meters apart).Couple of interesting facts:
1) The ultra violet rays would have turned the American flag to white. Does that mean we have surrendered on the Moon?
2) We have yet to build a telescope with enough resolution to see the stuff we left behind.
Pretty amazing technology. I worked for JPL at NASA's Goldstone Deep Space Network complex in the mid-sixties supporting the Surveyor and Lunar Orbiter missions. The technologies were relatively primitive back then, but got the Apollo missions to the moon and back over fifty years ago.
Thanks WDD, this is exactly what I was wondering. Glad someone captured the site. Amazing the camera has 1.6' resolution.Apollo 11 landing site (decent stage, etc.)
Thanks WDD, this is exactly what I was wondering. Glad someone captured the site. Amazing the camera has 1.6' resolution.
Full website: http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/484
Amazing the camera has 1.6' resolution.
Not a planet.
I guess this was just a touch and go.....with a looong touch....
And did anyone ever go back and get the cameraman.??
Actually I have found space travel and exploration exciting ever since I was a little kid. That hasn't ever left me.
There were many uncertainties about how well our Lunar module systems and our Pressure suit and backpack would match the engineering predictions in the hostile lunar environment. We were operating in a near perfect vacuum with the temperature well above 200 degrees Fahrenheit with the local gravity only one sixth that of Earth. That combination cannot be duplicated here on Earth, but we tried as best we could to test our equipment for those conditions. For example, because normal air conditioning is inadequate for lunar conditions, we were required to use cold water to cool the interior of our suits. We did not have any data to tell us how long the small water tank in our backpacks would suffice. NASA officials limited our surface working time to 2 and 3/4 hours on that first surface exploration to assure that we would not expire of hyperthermia. After returning to and repressurizing the Lunar Module, we were able to drain and measure the remaining water in the backpacks to confirm the predicted.