Would they buy a TV that can't be turned off?
Nope, the Spot trackers are satellite based - Iridium I believe.
On the other hand in the middle of the Cold War you can land a 172 in Red Square. Could be embarrassing depending on where they find it.
Why would you use a stolen 777 to deliver a WMD when a PC-12 would do just as well and be a lot easier to procure and keep under the wraps, not to mention fuel.
Israel has a 24/7 CAP, F-15 are always airborne there. Israel as always is very well prepared for this eventuality.
NY Times: Pilot Spoke to Air Controllers After Shutoff of Data SystemDid the ACARS stop before or after the pilot said "good night"?
Yes, while civilian radars are 2D and rely on mode C for altitude, there are 3D military air search radars that can determine altitude. Some are phased array, some are two separate antennas. Not sure how they actually work.
We pretty much fly Cap over the Capital Zone which probably covers near the entire area of Israel. It's simple to fly a hi cap mission on a small area.
If they were asleep how could they say "good night"?I didn't say it was suspicious, I said maybe they were asleep. Did you read the rest of that post?
It's a real PITA that this board doesn't preserve the context of quotes, but if you read back it might (or might not) be clear that I was referring to the possibility that the crew was overcome by smoke without radioing for help because they were asleep at the time they were overcome with smoke. That would have been after the fire started, but before the crew was aware of it. Obviously, that would have required them to fall asleep after their last known radio call.If they were asleep how could they say "good night"?
No, not putting you on. If the crew fell asleep after saying "good night" then "good night" is in no was suspicious because they didn't know anything was going to happen to them. Ironic maybe, but not suspicious.It's a real PITA that this board doesn't preserve the context of quotes, but if you read back it might (or might not) be clear that I was referring to the possibility that the crew was overcome by smoke without radioing for help because they were asleep at the time they were overcome with smoke. That would have been after the fire started, but before the crew was aware of it. Obviously, that would have required them to fall asleep after their last known radio call.
Although, I'm beginning to suspect that you're putting me on.
You're the one who suggested it might be suspicious.No, not putting you on. If the crew fell asleep after saying "good night" then "good night" is in no was suspicious because they didn't know anything was going to happen to them. Ironic maybe, but not suspicious.
No, I'm the one who laughed at the idea that it might be suspicious.You're the one who suggested it might be suspicious.
How is "good night" even a little bit suspicious?
They found the missing airliner. The mars rover found it on the moom late this afternoon.
So, who said it was suspicious?No, I'm the one who laughed at the idea that it might be suspicious.
If I'm intent on doing bad why wouldn't I wait until just AFTER I spoke to the last sector ? If it was purposely done at that point you run the risk of the ground station saying "Hey, wait a minute, recycle your transponder, we just lost your signal".
I figured it was you when you posted this. You seemed to make a point of saying their last transmission was "good night".So, who said it was suspicious?
What if the flight crew was asleep? It wouldn't be the first time it happened. And their last transmission was "good night".... The folks in the back might not have known anything was wrong until it was way too late.
It'd be sexier if you said the fire could have been started by aliens.
I figured it was you when you posted this. You seemed to make a point of saying their last transmission was "good night".
If that's not what he meant then I apologize for reading it wrong. But you're correct about the idiots on CNN.I didn't think he was suggesting that it was suspicious
but yesterday the idiots on CNN were calling it "A GAME CHANGER"
Everybody knows pilots always end radio communications with "over and out" in a monotone voice. Anything else is obviously nefarious.I didn't think he was suggesting that it was suspicious
but yesterday the idiots on CNN were calling it "A GAME CHANGER"
Everybody knows pilots always end radio communications with "over and out" in a monotone voice.
I will say this. The 'educated guess' of a SPY-1D (phased array) is accurate enough to put a missile on a target without requiring a separate illuminator.On either type, the altitude is a fairly educated guess due to beamwidth and listening time issues that determine how big the resolution cell is when it bounces off the target. Some RADAR systems can be +/- 5,000 ft given the day and atmospheric conditions such as anomalous propagation. Other systems can be pretty close.
Agreed.Until we know what specific RADAR or RADARs were used to derive the altitude, we won't know how accurate any of the height cuts are once Mode C was turned off.
We do, don't we
I get it now. That's just my dry wit. Let's try again:I figured it was you when you posted this. You seemed to make a point of saying their last transmission was "good night".