denverpilot
Tied Down
Google didn't buy Motorola to build phones. They bought it for the Intellectual Property portfolio. An IP portfolio is a weapon, and large companies with large IP portfolios engage in a tactic better known by it's Cold War name: mutually assured destruction.
You see, even when a company tries it's best to design something that does not infringe on the patents of another, it probably has some element that encroaches on said patent. Having your own large portfolio means that *if* you get sued for infringement you can sue back for some infringement that the other guy makes of your patent (all bets are off if it's a patent troll doing the suing).
So, as Apple has sued Samsung for infringement involving Android phones, it's widely believed that this is a test case - if they win, it's expected that they'll then sue Google. By having this portfolio, Google can be in a position to potentially countersue. More likely, A & G will settle with a mutual licensing agreement. Whether or not G will step up to defend Samsung is an unknown question. It's also interesting that Samsung is a significant supplier to Apple.
Once that is considered, the purchase price is easily rationalized. That they get the ability to design & build phones is icing on the cake (and provides a way of ensuring that they can still build/sell devices even if Samsung goes down).
While this is all true, if you're insinuating that Google always intended to destroy 4000 people's livelihoods and wreck a business just to get IP, their leadership is far more evil than I suspected.
I was going with "just plain stupid" up until you state that their priority never was their employees they purchased.
"Do no evil" my ass. Greedy conniving bastards playing with 4000 people's lives, instead.
Apple too, of course. But at least they're generally forthright about it and aren't manipulating the market with loss-leader products.
It's all just "good for consumers" right? Companies destroying other companies for IP while the staff is the cannon fodder?