IFR Lost Comms Question

CC268

Final Approach
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
5,532
Display Name

Display name:
CC268
Well I am about 3/4 of the way through my IFR training, prepping for the oral exam, checkride, etc.

Anyways, my bottom VOR had issues holding calibration so we ordered up a "serviceable" one the week before last. It came in and the new one wasn't working correctly so we are currently waiting for another one. So unfortunately I haven't flown with my instructor for 2 weeks. I have been flying VFR 3-4 times a week though to get my 50 hours XC time. Need 6 more hours.

So...I will ask my instructor this question when I fly with him again, but for now I figured I would ask the question to the magnificent pilots of PoA.

So for IFR Lost Comms we follow the acronym AVEFMEA, squawk 7600.

Fly your route based on your last:

Assigned (Your last assigned heading)
Vectored (If nothing is assigned fly your last vector)
Expected (If no vector fly what was expected in your clearance)
Filed (Finally fly what you filed)

AND fly the highest of the following:

Minimum en-route altitude
Expected altitude
Assigned altitude

If our destination is IFR we would hold at our last filed fix (VOR, GPS waypoint, etc) until we reach our ETA filed on our flight plan and then shoot the approach.

Question: What do you do if you are PAST your ETA by the time you get to your last filed fix?

Thanks.
 
Regulations aside, the consensus among controllers seems to be "get it on the ground...we know your situation and have sterilized the airspace for you. Holding just delays the inevitable and makes our job harder."

Bob
 
Regulations aside, the consensus among controllers seems to be "get it on the ground...we know your situation and have sterilized the airspace for you. Holding just delays the inevitable and makes our job harder."

Bob

Thanks, that makes sense. Does that hold true even if you arrived BEFORE your ETA (regulations aside as you said)?
 
Regulations aside, the consensus among controllers seems to be "get it on the ground...we know your situation and have sterilized the airspace for you. Holding just delays the inevitable and makes our job harder."

Bob
I agree with Bob. It's not like if you get to your last fix near the airport that we would just release IFR traffic around you. We'd wait. Also, food for thought, what if your last fix prior to your destination was 3 states ago and you were 10 min early? Would you set up your own hold pattern somewhere?

As a controller, I'd prefer you to go on in because I guarantee I've already cleared the airspace and will be delaying planes until you get on the ground. As a pilot, that's what I'd do as well. In my mind if you are IMC and NORDO (GA plane especially) you are an emergency.
 
I agree with Bob. It's not like if you get to your last fix near the airport that we would just release IFR traffic around you. We'd wait. Also, food for thought, what if your last fix prior to your destination was 3 states ago and you were 10 min early? Would you set up your own hold pattern somewhere?

As a controller, I'd prefer you to go on in because I guarantee I've already cleared the airspace and will be delaying planes until you get on the ground. As a pilot, that's what I'd do as well. In my mind if you are IMC and NORDO (GA plane especially) you are an emergency.

So on the oral exam I'll just say "this fella Radar Contact told me to just go on in and not hold at the fix" haha I'm just kidding. What your saying makes total sense. I guess I will use the "checkride" answer of holding at the fix, but maybe mention something about just shooting the approach since they have an eye on me and I can assume they have cleared the airspace for me anyways.
 
Good on you to get full clarification on Lost Comms.

This was an area my examiner really emphasized during my check ride.
 
I guess I will use the "checkride" answer of holding at the fix, but maybe mention something about just shooting the approach since they have an eye on me and I can assume they have cleared the airspace for me anyways.
I would make it in the form of a question.
 
I've rarely had an IFR clearance where I'm not cleared to the AIRPORT. Once I make it to the airport, I'm not leaving it again IFR without working radios.
 
For the oral exam, you should:

1. Tell the examiner what the regulations say to do
2. Tell the examiner what you would actually do
3. Explain why you would do something different from the what the regulations say to do
4. Explain why you are allowed to do something different from what the regulations say to do

In this case:
1. The regulations say to hold at my last cleared point until my expect further clearance time
2. I would actually fly direct to an initial approach fix and begin the approach
3. I would do that because it is safer and does less to tie up the airspace
4. The regulations allow me, as PIC, to deviate from any regulation in order to address an emergency, and lost comms in IMC is enough of an emergency for me to fly the approach before my ETA
 
Regulations aside, the consensus among controllers seems to be "get it on the ground...we know your situation and have sterilized the airspace for you. Holding just delays the inevitable and makes our job harder."

Bob

Yup, while not the textbook answer nor the regulation I was told directly by a TRACON supervisor in reality that they are clearing the airspace for you and would expect ya to just shoot an approach ASAP regardless of ETA since they do not know what other emergency you may be contending with in the cockpit nor would you be busted for doing so.
 

It's too bad that the regulation writers can't be gotten on the same page as ATC. :rolleyes1:

Good lord...so the logic is go to an IAF of an approach and hold there till ETA...meanwhile you have completely locked up that approach to any further incoming traffic by holding at said IAF till an imaginary made up time passes...for 25 min in their scenario.

How is that logical?...I know...it is the FAA, it's not.
 
Good lord...so the logic is go to an IAF of an approach and hold there till ETA...meanwhile you have completely locked up that approach to any further incoming traffic by holding at said IAF till an imaginary made up time passes...for 25 min in their scenario.

How is that logical?...I know...it is the FAA, it's not.

Yep, the logic of an FAA lawyer who doesn't sit behind a radar scope on a daily basis. :confused:
 
I wouldn’t get into the weeds on a checkride. Just quote the good book. They cannot fail you for that. They can for telling them in reality you’d ignore the rules and do you own thing.

In reality do what your gut tells you, but I would keep the yap shut in front of the examiner.
 
Well I am about 3/4 of the way through my IFR training, prepping for the oral exam, checkride, etc.

Anyways, my bottom VOR had issues holding calibration so we ordered up a "serviceable" one the week before last. It came in and the new one wasn't working correctly so we are currently waiting for another one. So unfortunately I haven't flown with my instructor for 2 weeks. I have been flying VFR 3-4 times a week though to get my 50 hours XC time. Need 6 more hours.

So...I will ask my instructor this question when I fly with him again, but for now I figured I would ask the question to the magnificent pilots of PoA.

So for IFR Lost Comms we follow the acronym AVEFMEA, squawk 7600.

Fly your route based on your last:

Assigned (Your last assigned heading)
Vectored (If nothing is assigned fly your last vector)
Expected (If no vector fly what was expected in your clearance)
Filed (Finally fly what you filed)

AND fly the highest of the following:

Minimum en-route altitude
Expected altitude
Assigned altitude

If our destination is IFR we would hold at our last filed fix (VOR, GPS waypoint, etc) until we reach our ETA filed on our flight plan and then shoot the approach.

Question: What do you do if you are PAST your ETA by the time you get to your last filed fix?

Thanks.
..Vectored (If nothing is assigned fly your last vector)??????
You don't just keep flying that vector. You go to the 'fix, route or airway specified in the vecored clearance. If you get "fly heading whatever for vector to wherever," then you go to 'wherever' when you go Nordo
 
..Vectored (If nothing is assigned fly your last vector)??????
You don't just keep flying that vector. You go to the 'fix, route or airway specified in the vecored clearance. If you get "fly heading whatever for vector to wherever," then you go to 'wherever' when you go Nordo

Yes I think you misunderstood me, but we are in agreement.
 
It's a good question. Is the answer the same for a towered vs non-towered airport?

I would suspect in the system and only radio failure the squawk change would tell them what's going on. Also losing the code altogether would tell them something if there is still a radar return.

Following the last order seems to apply, and with no issued hold instructions proceeding makes sense.

[Note: all worthless opinions of mine]
 
Tower or not makes little difference other than I'd be looking for a light signal when I broke out.
 
This regulation needs a rewrite, especially with regards to when to leave a clearance limit. Nowadays the clearance limit is often the airport. A literal reading of the reg suggests you fly to the airport (how, in IMC and without GPS?), then to an IAF. That makes no sense yet often very experienced pilots on this and other forums argue that's what you should do. And, as illustrated earlier in this thread, there's a disconnect between what the regulation says and what ATC, and common sense, suggest with regard to timing of leaving the "clearance limit".
 
Back
Top