Are there helicopter pilots here?
is there a better forum for heli discussions?
Why fly one or another?
What is different? I am thinking in terms of wind and turbulence or IFR.
What else?
I've ordered the FAA book.
Vertical Reference Forum used to be good, it's pretty dead now:
https://helicopterforum.verticalreference.com/index.php?
Helicopters are a lot more fun to fly than most airplanes in my opinion. The problem is they're real expensive in terms of maintenance and insurance. As was mentioned earlier, an R22 could be affordable but you're basically getting Cessna 150 levels of performance and payload for Bonanza levels of cost (with the added perk of *usually* being able to takeoff and land vertically). One of the things I learned when earning my rotor add-on was that hovering outside of ground effect in helicopters is not possible in a surprisingly wide range of situations (especially underpowered ones operating near max takeoff weight).
I am glad I earned the commercial add-on. However, I have not flown a helicopter since the checkride. Rental helicopters, or lack thereof, are largely driven by lack of insurance. My flight school said I can rent the helicopter after my rating, but to carry passengers I also had to carry a CFI.....kinda rules out the R22 (two seats). It was also $300/hr for an R22 and $500/hr for an R44 last I checked, and according to my CFI the flight school wasn't making much money off that (charging for instruction was the profit center).
With that said, I feel like the academic side of the rating greatly expanded my understanding of aerodynamics. Studying the rotor system of the Robinson and getting to sit around with an instructor to really flesh out how it all works to the point where I was knowledgeable enough to pass a commercial checkride was a lot fun.
If it was affordable for me, I'd have my own helicopter. The only one I could really afford is the R22 and since I weigh over 200 lbs, it's basically a solo only machine. The R44 is incredibly fun to fly, It's like strapping on a superman cape once you're proficient with it. Flying them is a bit tedious. Even the engine starts are stressful given the chance of overspeeding if you mismanage a motor that is stubborn to start. Then the governor off approaches, hydraulics off approaches, slope landings, autorotations etc would require a lot of practice to stay proficient with. In my airplane I just practice engine out work once in awhile and call it good, there just isn't much that can go wrong in a small single engine airplane compared to even an R44. R44 was more like an airliner in terms of stuff that could go wrong.
In the end the rating ended up being a $50k black hole, but it was a bucket list item for me. However, the experience makes me think twice about things like a glider rating that I've always wanted to do but deep down know there isn't a practical application for. There's a reason that powered airplanes are the dominant form of air transportation.