tspear
En-Route
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2010
- Messages
- 3,587
- Display Name
Display name:
Timothy
Common Core. All answers are correct.
If you passed Common Core, then you would be able to do the math.
Tim
Common Core. All answers are correct.
Stop the madness.. .So let me further elaborate that since I don't bucket a T&G into the full stop landing category, so I also don't count it as a takeoff. Full stop landings and full stop takeoffs are counted separately.
If I did a stop and go, that would be a landing and a takeoff. A T&G is just rubbing pavement imo...sure it's a landing, but not a full stop one.
There are buckets on myflightbook for landings full stop, landings t&g and takeoffs full stop (probably called something different on the site but you get the point).
If I really wanted to know how many T&G takeoffs I had, I could just use the T&G landing bucket..
Here's a more verbose breakdown:
View attachment 55643
Takeoffs (any) are day takeoffs from a full stop (no T&G). Takeoffs - Night, same thing only at night, stop and go's are included because, well it's a full stop.
If it doesn't say Touch and Go, then the landing was to a full stop. So I have 226 T&G's and 207 full stop landings (433 total).
Stop the madness.. .
???? As compared to? Cracky mate, read your own byzantine, multi-line, and stupendously pointless recitation on counting TOs and landings! If that's of use to the OP, bless 'im. . .Guys, this isn't about me. It's about the OP. Yes, I probably have some cleanup to do based upon how I bucketed my stuff from my paper logbook into MyFlightbook, but I'm only off by like 37 takeoffs over 15-20 years, which is no big deal considering the time-span. I'm not concerned.
Not helpful at all. Please refrain from commenting unless you have something useful to add.
Hello folks,
15 hours on the log book and I got kicked out today by my CFI. His reason, all his students solo in 10 hours and I was unable to get a good control of pitch or was unable to co-ordinate my turns in 15 hours. The gist of his parting comment was, I was not worth his time.
Not trying to start a blame game here, but I got to fly once, maybe twice a week in a Cessna 150 and got judged for every small mistake I made. Also, I believe I was never given the opportunity to feel the plane. But maybe, I am wrong considering my (now former) instructor has been around for more than a decade and runs his own Part 61 school here.
Really heartbroken. Would the more experienced pilots/CFIs here be able to recommend someone who could take my under their wing?
I am from Seattle area.
If you passed Common Core, then you would be able to do the math.
Tim
The goal should be to get the right answer. There a hundreds of ways to solve most problems, the trick of good teaching is finding the one that works best for the particular student. Common core is the death of free thinking.That is the school system. Nothing to do with Common Core, it is all implementation.
Read the spec, common core says the student must be able to accomplish addition/subtraction.
My first wife was a teacher, my daughter is a teacher, and I have multiple relatives that are teachers. So I get to hear about this sh** all the time.
Tim
The goal should be to get the right answer. There a hundreds of ways to solve most problems, the trick of good teaching is finding the one that works best for the particular student. Common core is the death of free thinking.
The goal should be to get the right answer. There a hundreds of ways to solve most problems, the trick of good teaching is finding the one that works best for the particular student. Common core is the death of free thinking.
The group that insists on doing it one way is the same group that insisted on common core. Common core is not simply another technique. If it were, nobody in their right mind would complain about it. It has nothing to do with a new technique, and everything to do with limiting free thinking.I agree with multiple techniques and finding the correct one. However, Common Core specifies what knowledge must be attained by specific grade level. It does not cover technique. For that you get to blame the school systems and the governors/state houses.
Learn to blame the correct party, not one that meets a marketing slogan.
Tim
The group that insists on doing it one way is the same group that insisted on common core. Common core is not simply another technique. If it were, nobody in their right mind would complain about it. It has nothing to do with a new technique, and everything to do with limiting free thinking.
Again, Common Core had nothing to do with technique. That was all at the school system or state level. Common core mandated what problems and knowledge only. The goal being, if you graduated from a school in Texas or Maryland or Alabama or New York... That employers and colleges/universities knew you met a minimal level of knowledge and ability.
So like I said, blame the school system or the state. Not Common Core. In fact, when you look at the implementation, where Common core mostly had a bad reputation is where it was pushed down from the top by the state with a single solution for everyone. Other states, that pushed the school system to comply without providing a solution have had less resistance. Again, it was a local political choice.
Tim
Are you saying you are against centralized control?
Thanks so much starglider. I have sent you a DM. One thing that has really got me surprised that I tried to hide even the home airport and still people figured it out.
Thanks so much starglider. I have sent you a DM. One thing that has really got me surprised that I tried to hide even the home airport and still people figured it out.