Actually A.A. Is a program that feels you should want to change your life from the mess you've made of it and that its up to you to join. They do not advertise or proselytize as you blab in your rant. Please show proof where anyone gave money to help start A.A. Your statement on this is untrue, a lie. You sound like you may need help yourself ! Usually someone that makes these kind of statements has tried and failed to beat an addiction. I should add that A.A was founded and was created for alcohol abuse. Drug problems are better left to narcotics anon. They might be able to help you.
The Rockefeller connection is well-known. Rockefeller gave AA a gift of $1,000.00 and bought 400 copies of the "Big Book" in 1940. It's hardly breaking news. Both the Rockefeller Foundation and Bill Wilson told pretty much the same story: Wilson had hoped for much more, but Rockefeller was convinced that the organization needed to be self-supporting.
You have to understand that Wilson was a businessman and Bob Smith a physician, and early AA operated more as a medical charity than a self-help group. Newcomers typically were hospitalized for a time, cleaned up, provided with essentials such as food and clothing, and so forth, all at the expense of an organization that didn't yet exist and which had no money. AA, as such, grew out of a Holiness movement called the Oxford Group, and only became an independent organization when the "alcoholic contingent" began to be resented by the rest of the group.
By 1940, the fledgling AA organization was deeply in debt, and Wilson was trying to raise funds to keep it afloat. Various means were tried, some shady, and some possibly illegal, before the group leaned down to something resembling its present structure (basically the groups themselves; "Intergroups" supported by and serving multiple groups with services like publishing lists of local meetings, answering the phone, and setting up 12th-step meetings; and the General Service Office in New York).
I learned about these things when I was doing research as an undergrad, and I was surprised. The early years of the organization were nothing like what the organization is now; and some of what the founders, especially Wilson, did to keep the organization alive were embarrassing, to put it mildly. But none of it is a news scoop. Wilson, his wife Lois, and many others have written and spoken about it.
What AA is today, at its most basic level, is a bunch of rooms full of drunks trying to help each other get sober, using a set of principles that originated in a turn-of-the-century Holiness movement as well as lessons learned by the early members' failures as well as their successes. That's it. There's no sign-up, no registration is needed, no attendance is taken, no last names are used, and no records are kept (unless an attendee needs and asks for documentation to show a court, parole office, spouse, or whomever).
I've met people who hate pretty much anything, but until this thread, I've never met nor read the words of someone who hated AA. I mean, it's a voluntary organization that helps at least some of those who walk through its doors, and costs those who fail nothing to try. Some people may object to its religious origins and spiritual focus, but so what? Don't go if those things bother you. Or define the Higher Power as the group itself or some other non-deity if you like.
My hunch is that the unreg probably is someone who is the sort of Atheist who not only doesn't believe, but despises the fact that anyone does; and was at one time ordered to attend AA for some reason resulting from his or her own alcohol-related bad acts. That's the only reason I can think of why someone would positively hate an organization that helps many, hurts none, forces no one to attend, and costs society nothing.
Of course, that's just a hunch. People can become obsessed over all kinds of bizarre ****. All I know is that in my experience, about two-thirds of the people I know who went to AA for help eventually stopped drinking. Some never drank again after their first meetings. Others took a while longer. Still others failed. But those who failed were no worse off for having tried.
Rich