No.did it count towards the BFR?
Out of curiosity, when did you apply? I'm still waiting for mine.Just got mine in the mail. I'm happy it looks different than an "actual" pilot's certificate.
Piece of cake to apply for under existing part 61.
Don't know if anyone posted already but prior to today I didn't know what it looked like.
That's me. I took the class and signed up for it just because I can.None of the choices on your poll is anything like, "not yet but I might". Most of the people I know who have gotten one did it just for the heck of it, not because they anticipate finding a job doing it.
Just got mine in the mail. I'm happy it looks different than an "actual" pilot's certificate.
Piece of cake to apply for under existing part 61.
Don't know if anyone posted already but prior to today I didn't know what it looked like.
Someone needs to verify identity (statutory requirement for an airman certificate) and 61.56 flight review status.Didn't get one, but I signed someone off for one the other day. Not sure why they need an instructor's endorsement on the IACRA form. It's an online course.
Sorry I didn't think to add that option. The third was just for giggles.None of the choices on your poll is anything like, "not yet but I might". Most of the people I know who have gotten one did it just for the heck of it, not because they anticipate finding a job doing it.
The instructor is just verifying the ID and certificate, and that the person presenting the data looks like the guy on the ID.Didn't get one, but I signed someone off for one the other day. Not sure why they need an instructor's endorsement on the IACRA form. It's an online course.
Out of curiosity, when did you apply? I'm still waiting for mine.
Actually, the direction from within the executive branch is to make it easier and cheaper to get and maintain a remote pilot certificate with small UAS rating.Yup. Seems like opertunity for those who are willing to grab it.
Besides, only a matter of time till the FAA makes this sUAS way harder to get, free and easy ain't the FAA
Actually, the direction from within the executive branch is to make it easier and cheaper to get and maintain a remote pilot certificate with small UAS rating.
A couple things: 1) small UAS bares little resemblance to the rest of manned light GA; 2) the small UAS lobby has suprising power and anticipate selling a bunch of aircraft. They've made it clear to their elected officials that creating unnecessary barriers to operation (i.e. Making it harder to get certified) would be bad for the industry. Folks like Amazon have pretty strong influence, and they also sell a bunch of quadcopters (not to mention their own UAS delivery R&D).This doesn't jive with FAA/gov history.
Personally I have much more faith in history than politician lip service.
No, but I'd like to hear more about how that works out. Perhaps a good topic for ACRP paper?Yup...got mine (just the temp so far) and picked up a drone.
Not to drift the thread, but we're considering using a drone for bird control, due to a problem with birds at our uncontrolled field. Last week a bird (either a killdeer or a dove) caught a Citation radome on take-off. Enough damage that it will be replaced (both the radome and the bird) , and fortunately the remains went under the wing, instead of thru the engine.
Considering harassing the birds during nesting with a drone to prevent hatching. and/or setting up a group of waypoints along the runway to chase them off. Anybody had any experience with that? Thanks!
Jim
Not worth the drive down to the FSDO for another card for me.
I have the same thoughts as well......the extra piece of paper sounds nice....but, rather worthless for me IMHO.No, but I'd like to hear more about how that works out. Perhaps a good topic for ACRP paper?
Huh?I have the same thoughts as well......the extra piece of paper sounds nice....but, rather worthless for me IMHO.
Yup...got mine (just the temp so far) and picked up a drone.
Not to drift the thread, but we're considering using a drone for bird control, due to a problem with birds at our uncontrolled field. Last week a bird (either a killdeer or a dove) caught a Citation radome on take-off. Enough damage that it will be replaced (both the radome and the bird) , and fortunately the remains went under the wing, instead of thru the engine.
Considering harassing the birds during nesting with a drone to prevent hatching. and/or setting up a group of waypoints along the runway to chase them off. Anybody had any experience with that? Thanks!
Jim
A couple things: 1) small UAS bares little resemblance to the rest of manned light GA; 2) the small UAS lobby has suprising power and anticipate selling a bunch of aircraft. They've made it clear to their elected officials that creating unnecessary barriers to operation (i.e. Making it harder to get certified) would be bad for the industry. Folks like Amazon have pretty strong influence, and they also sell a bunch of quadcopters (not to mention their own UAS delivery R&D).
If you read the NPRM versus the final part 107 rule you'll see that it got easier to become certificated. Expect it to get easier to maintain certification was well.
yup...my badHuh?
Edit: I think you meant to reply to the following message.
Yup...got mine (just the temp so far) and picked up a drone.
Not to drift the thread, but we're considering using a drone for bird control, due to a problem with birds at our uncontrolled field. Last week a bird (either a killdeer or a dove) caught a Citation radome on take-off. Enough damage that it will be replaced (both the radome and the bird) , and fortunately the remains went under the wing, instead of thru the engine.
Considering harassing the birds during nesting with a drone to prevent hatching. and/or setting up a group of waypoints along the runway to chase them off. Anybody had any experience with that? Thanks!
Jim
yup.....that's the reason for the noose....all certs are in play with an enforcement action to include an A&P's cert.From a slightly paranoid mind: If you hold part 61 and part 107 certificates and do something with a "drone" that results in FAA action, can they also take action against your part 61 cert?
Nauga,
and a Trappy kinda question
From a slightly paranoid mind: If you hold part 61 and part 107 certificates and do something with a "drone" that results in FAA action, can they also take action against your part 61 cert?
Nauga,
and a Trappy kinda question
Not to drift the thread, but check with the local Fish and Game. May not be kosher to harass the birds during nesting. Instead, hit them right at sundown to keep them from roosting during non-nesting time.
From a slightly paranoid mind: If you hold part 61 and part 107 certificates and do something with a "drone" that results in FAA action, can they also take action against your part 61 cert?
Nauga,
and a Trappy kinda question
The airport has already gotten a permit from Those Who Must Be Obeyed (which means I'm not sure just whom) to shoot them on discretion regardless of season....FWIW. Agree with the sunset idea 100%. Thanks!
Jim
Didn't know you could get a permit to break the law... Maybe it was issued by this guy
Really? Where did they say that?The FAA has already promised they will do just that.
Aside from egregious violations (perjury, falsifying records, criminal activity while exercising the privileges of the certificate, etc.) can you cite a situation where the FAA has pulled all of an airman's certificates? What does chapter 7 of the compliance and enforcement order say?yup.....that's the reason for the noose....all certs are in play with an enforcement action to include an A&P's cert.
Really? Where did they say that?
Aside from egregious violations (perjury, falsifying records, criminal activity while exercising the privileges of the certificate, etc.) can you cite a situation where the FAA has pulled all of an airman's certificates? What does chapter 7 of the compliance and enforcement order say?
It says for egregious violations they can pull all of your certificates. Are we talking egregious violations or any violation?2150.3B, Chg 11 Appendix H, H4 & H5