The Garmins will sort of do it, albeit without a magenta line and the active waypoint will still be "to" the VOR. The Avidyne will not.
Found a use for vectors to final
- Thread starter David Megginson
- Start date
David Megginson
Pattern Altitude
Ah, I didn't realise Avidyne's IFD series lacked that feature. Since they were designing slide-in replacements for the old Garmin GNS series, I'd assumed they'd have started with the same features.
I'll have to check next time I'm in my plane if my GTN 650 draws the magenta line right through the waypoint in OBS mode.
I don't assume two different companies will automatically approach and prioritize flight management tasks in exactly the same way. "Lack" is subjective. I'm sure there are those who chose IFDs who will be happy to point out what Garmin units "lack" (I realize you probably didn't mean it that way
) I'm pretty sure "direct replacement" refers to ease of hardware installation, not cloning the appAvidyne OBS mode assumes you are going somewhere via that random radial and automatically resumes automatic sequencing when you get there. Probably figures the "outbound to nowhere" scenario is not common enough to worry about.
Last edited:
David Megginson
Pattern Altitude
I agree it's pretty uncommon now in the RNAV world, but it didn't used to be. I often got clearances outbound via a VOR radial (off airway) back in the VOR days.
Even back then, I don't recall a ""fly that radial outbound forever unless I tell you otherwise." it was (almost?) always "to" something. Might be until another fix (as in Russ' scenario) , to intercept an airway, etc, even if it's only "expected" at that point. Both units can do that, although "green needles" may be much easier, especially in the airway intercept scenario. (I wouldn't do that one even sitting on the ground unless, perhaps, I had a lot of time and it was a common clearance in an area where I flew often)
This option is too often forgotten. For something random like this, why not just tune the VOR, set the OBS to the radial and simply fly it like that?
- Martin
People get these fancy boxes and figure they have to do everything with it. To paraphrase the quote attributed to Freud, "Sometimes a VOR is just a VOR."
Tokirbymd
Pre-takeoff checklist
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2019
- Messages
- 286
- Display Name
Display name:
Tokirbymd
I understand the danger of flying the magenta line on approach since that hasn’t been surveyed and can lead to CFIT. However, when given enroute vector like this, you presumably would be above the MVA. So the routing is for ATC to separate you from someone or some airspace. Given that, how accurate would you need to be to get on course and simply set a heading until you could get the box programmed? I would think 3nm either side of an expected routing would be adequate and could be hand flown with a heading off or foreflight or similar until you had time to set up the box correctly? I know this isn’t considered correct but this kind of situation isn’t flying a surveyed route anyway.
If you need time to get the box set up, ask ATC for a vector to follow until you get the avionics set up.
It sounds like you are asking whether you need to be accurate when flying a heading assigned by ATC. Are you.
Tokirbymd
Pre-takeoff checklist
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2019
- Messages
- 286
- Display Name
Display name:
Tokirbymd
What I mean is if given “fly 360 intercept 090 radial from ABC to 30dme, then direct”. The 360 is a given. However if the 090 radial to a dme isn’t on an airway or a gps fix that may take a few min to program. Getting “close enough” using moving map foreflight etc for a bit on a heading then programming seems ok to me
The heading is the heading is the heading. You should have more than enough time between receiving the vector and the radial to tune the VOR or program the GPS (assuming that course was not part of your clearance to begin with). Things just don't happen that fast. ATC is used to giving those instruction to pretty fast aircraft.
Foreflight? Sure. It's a chart so I would definitely take a quick look to get an idea where that radial is in relation to me and to confirm the VOR ID and frequency, but beyond that, I wouldn't waste the time I could be using to set up the certified boxes.
In terms of doing it with a GPS, we're talking less than a minute if you know how. Maybe half that to do it old school - tune the VOR and twist the dual. Pretty basic task. I can't even count the number of times I was given an instruction to intercept a radial when I was training. But if you don't know how, even an hour wont be enough.
edit. I need to add this. If the time is too short to set it up, new school or old, speak up. "We need time to set up. Can you turn us on to the airway?" only takes a few extra seconds, avoids a potential deviation and is a better choice than visually winging it with your EFB.
Last edited: