Tom-D
Taxi to Parking
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 34,740
- Display Name
Display name:
Tom-D
OTOH, failing to impose and enforce a good set of rules is a good way for your group to get a bad repuation so it isn't welcome there or elsewhere (airport managers talk to each other) in the future. AYA has held its conventions all over the US and Canada, and one of the things that breaks down airport management opposition to our flying events is the stack of references we have from other airports. We just tell them to call the managers at the last three or four locations and ask about us, and that's the end of the opposition, even where other groups have fouled the waters before us.
Also, from a competitive standpoint, setting a fairly high minimum speed turns it into a contest of bombing skill, not who's got the lowest stall speed.
In 1997 the 170 association held their annual fly in at Paine Field here in Wa.
We had the poker run to 5 airports in northern Puget Sound, we included the flour bomb drop into the run, we had no other rules other than who decided who won. you bought your flour bag before the start of the poker run, the money went to a good cause, and you made your drop at Barkers airfield on the way to pick up your first card at BVS. That's all there was to it, no rules we knew the pilots could fly their own aircraft, no body got killed, every one had a good time, we found out who won the poker hand at orcus eastbound airport had the fly out lunch there, and played the second hand on the way back to PAE.
I don't know what to think about a club that would require all these rules. is it the leadership or the pilots/members?
and I'm sure that PAE would love to see the 170 association again. they are a good bunch.