Fair point. Maybe I'd take advice from him on how to set down a plane with a crippled/blown engine. But not on proper engine management.
7 ENGINE FAILURES? I hate to say this with absolutely no evidence, but I'm not completely sure I believe that. Unless he is a bonafide test pilot.
I personally know two people with four each and one 20,000+ hour instructor who's had exactly zero. It's a scatter plot.
Yup, it will indeed extend your landing roll. Which is why you use it like flaps. When the field is made, push the blue knob in and the flaps down (the gear may need to be a bit earlier in a Cessna retract).
In a 182, the blue knob makes an easily noticeable difference in glide distance.
Interesting idea. I can second that on the big 182 prop it's a significant difference if you can get I to course pitch.
You are missing a key point: unless the engine/prop was specifically designed to feather (the vast majority of single engine pistons are not) you will never actually get the prop to feather and stop windmilling. It will continue to spin, but with less flat plate drag.
Others covered this, but slowing way up below best glide will usually get it to stop windmilling, but you really need spare altitude to mess with it and in doing so you're burning altitude you might need to get a marginal glide performance increase after you go back to best glide. Not worth it.
But there's YouTube videos of people braver or stupider than truly necessary who like creating possible emergencies when they don't have to, who've stopped both fixed pitch and constant speed props at altitude and then the compression and what not counteracting getting it windmilling again seems to work on lighter/slower aircraft. Heavier/faster aircraft exert enough force that the prop will start rotating again.
You can't "feather" a typical single enough to make the engine stop rotating at anything resembling best glide speed. Coarse pitch isn't very coarse.
See above. There used to be some YT examples. I think a number of them have been removed by their posters though, deciding that advertising that one creates unnecessary emergencies in flight, on a public video forum, is probably not a great idea.
The prop driving the engine at low rpm/low mp is okay.
What you do not want is high rpm/low mp, as in a steep descent using your prop drag to reduce speed.
Another thing you can do in an actual emergency engine-out once finished all troubleshooting with no restart, is to open thethrottle. Of course fuel and ignition will be off. Now your pistons are not pulling as much of a vacuum on the intake stroke.
I'd heard this long ago and forgotten it. Thanks for the reminder.
Yes. Drag is less for the two blades stopped in fine pitch, than it is with them turning in coarse or fine pitch.
Ring flutter, broken rings. With the throttle closed and the piston moving swiftly up and down, the cylinder pressure goes negative on the intake stroke.
Have also heard this but many manufacturers do demand this sort of operation for an emergency descent and many many schools and instructors and examiners and what not, want this procedure done even in training, by the book. Will be an interesting discussion in person with some mechanics and instructors at the airport however. Interesting point.
So, what is the safest way to practice emergency descents or simulated engine failures? Idle MP and low rpm? Wouldn't the high rpm help you get down quicker for the emergency descent?
Yeah that's the gist of my comment above.
During practice or simulated, take care of the engine...Idle/low rpm.
If I had an engine fire, then I would use high rpm and get on the ground as quickly as possible.
And I understand what you're saying here, too. I think if we really want to get to the bottom of this we'd have to talk this through with mechanics on specific powerplants. Some may behave far better than others in this regime.
I typically run 2,100 rpm and 45-55% power for better fuel economy, less wear, lower noise levels down low/short trips. On long xc flights between 8.5-12.5K, I usually run 2,100-2,400 rpm and never above 65% power. I try to run WOT in cruise as your engine breathes better and use rpm to keep the power where I want it. I follow the charts in the Lycoming Engine manual and low rpm/high mp are not recommended. At 2,100 rpm, 27.5" mp is the book limit for my engine. I try not to operate near the limits. I try to keep cht under 400F at all times. Takeoff and climb at 2700 rpm.
Heh. Just a side note. Boy you gotta love turbochargers! Heh. You can regularly see takeoff power way up above 34" on the Turbo Seminole turning just over 2500 RPM. Wheee.
What was really amazing today was seeing it was possible to poke an engine into overboost above 11,000 MSL because it was cold as all get out up there here today. -18C measured. Normally up there for various demos you can truly go to full throttle on those engines but not today! Brrrrrr.