FAF to MAP timing…AIM

J

John Dreylick

Filing Flight Plan
Joined
May 10, 2022
Messages
3
Display Name
Display name:
RoarkJr
Hello, new to the forum here. Where exactly in the AIM does it say that the speed/time chart for the FAF to MAP chart on approach plates is GS and not IAS? Thanks.
 
Country Flier said:
I know this doesn't answer your question, but, does it need to say it? IAS makes no sense.
Click to expand...
EdFred said:
You are flying at 90kts IAS at < 2000 MSL and have a 90kt headwind, do you really think it's going to take you 3 minutes to go 4.5 miles?
Click to expand...
I believe at that point you are in a hurricane and should consider reviewing your flight planning process!

Point taken, though. I guess I just wanted the warm and fuzzy of having a reference to cite. Common sense will do I suppose.
 
MauleSkinner said:
Yet another reason not to use government charts. ;)
Click to expand...
Lol. Yeah. But one could look at like this. Jepp users need to be told the obviousness of that it would be Groundspeed. The Gov gives them a little credit for knowing that. Not serious here, just funnin around a little.
 
I was gonna suggest the Aeronautical Chart User's guide but I see someone beat me, though I would have been too lazy to look up which page it was on anyway.

Not saying it's right, but a lot of people just use their IAS (which is probably why the OP started this thread), as over the distance of a few miles the difference isn't that much unless the wind is particularly strong. The fact that you are only expected to maintain airspeed within +/- 10 knots and that the wind is going to be changing during your descent means that attempting to be exact about your timing is like measuring with a micrometer and cutting with an axe.

MauleSkinner said:
Yet another reason not to use government charts. ;)
Click to expand...

Jepp also gives you a more logical breakdown of groundspeeds which are closer together. Pretty much the only thing I like better about the FAA charts is the mini airport diagram, and last I heard they were strongly considering removing it, if they haven't already.
 
EdFred said:
Primacy and all that. But I don't like the layout or look of Jepp charts. I also like the airport diagram on the gov chart.
Click to expand...
I do admit that I’ve done two approaches with government charts in my career. They were scary approaches.
 
dmspilot said:
attempting to be exact about your timing is like measuring with a micrometer and cutting with an axe.
Click to expand...

It really is. There is just no way (sans GPS) to be that precise about ground speed.

I mean, you have IAS, which is going to be a little off of CAS.
Then you have TAS, which is going to generally be a few knots faster than CAS.
Then you have the wind, presumably a headwind. I've seen it vary by 20 knots or more over the course of flying final (not talking about wind shear).
And inaccuracies of how well you fly - holding speed, starting the timer, and even whether you're weaving back and forth across final or not.

Pretending that timing is anywhere near remotely accurate is a fantasy.

Fortunately, some of these errors tend to cancel themselves out in a lot of situations. For example, if 100 kias = 100 kcas, and the airplane is at 3000 feet on an 85 deg F day, then TAS is about 107. If there's a light headwind, then there you are back to 100 kts GS which is the same as indicated.
 
dmspilot said:
Not saying it's right, but a lot of people just use their IAS (which is probably why the OP started this thread), as over the distance of a few miles the difference isn't that much unless the wind is particularly strong. The fact that you are only expected to maintain airspeed within +/- 10 knots and that the wind is going to be changing during your descent means that attempting to be exact about your timing is like measuring with a micrometer and cutting with an axe.
Click to expand...
There used to be a VOR-A approach into Toluca, Mexico, that used a table like this to time your outbound leg on the missed approach, keeping you within 10 miles. I had a couple of guys run about 3 miles beyond the 10 because they used IAS instead of GS. At 12,000 feet there’s almost a 25% increase in TAS over IAS.
 
EdFred said:
Primacy and all that. But I don't like the layout or look of Jepp charts. I also like the airport diagram on the gov chart.
Click to expand...
I lived close to Jepp for 20 years. They used to give us free Trip Tiks for Angel Flights so I became very familiar with both FAA and Jepp. 20+ years ago, I think In Jepp was better - the paper was definitely better :D But, on balance, I never really saw much of a difference in approach plate presentation to call one "better" than the other or easier to understand than the other. Still don't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top