Jeff K
Pre-takeoff checklist
OK, I think I see the difference of viewpoint... and from each of ours we are right. Let me comment on your remaining points in what I intend to be friendly.
I have my own company. If you look at my log book, the vast majority of my flights are extended cross counties.. I have a certain day I want to leave... a certain day I wish to return, and 80+% of the time it's for business reasons. This drove my choice of an airplane. I heavily use my airplane for my business... it's integral to family vacations as well... and frankly I've made a lifestyle decision here. Are airplanes my hobby? Sure... but just like a fellow where auto's are his "hobby" he also uses his car as basic transportation.
If we agree a woman is pregnant... can we disagree to the degree?? Instead I think we really have two different issues here.
To me it's business ethics... say what you will do, do what you say. To you it was a crazy promotion at the local grocery store for 5 cent apples. I'm however noticing this store initially saying the supply of apples was unlimited yet they only had 90 apples in stock and no intent to source any above that. That is my issue here... the supply was limited yet representing it wasn't in the initial ads/interviews.
I'm not sure what you mean by "normal business". I don't see how one conducts oneself in business should change with the situation. Also I don't see this as a "crazy advertised special" but alot closer to "stupid advertised special." Advertised being the operative word. More on that at the end.
It's elements of both. On the surface it appeared to be a crazy promotion.... look at the title of this thread. However, the vendor repeatedly said the could handle any demand... that the promotion would last through the month, that they had the sources of the gas to meet the demand. Even the grocery store who runs a "crazy" promotion always has a disclaimer of limited supply. Obviously there was a known limit to the promotion.. Yet no disclosure of any limit... instead saying they wouldn't run out of gas. The lack of the disclaimer for this situation, and the vendor saying this situation would never occur is my issue here.
If I'd acted on the claim... so would I. However, do be aware businesses have been sued for false advertising and these cases are very often the focus of BBB complaints and actions from state attorney generals/the FTC. So the lack of signed contract still doesn't allow you to say whatever you want to the public in a business relationship. There is certain specific language that must be included in ad's to protect companies from liability.
At the end of our day, our "difference of opinion" consists of three missing words in the initial promotion: "While supplies last"
That being said.... I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill as I don't believe there was any real malice here and as I earlier stated this is likely a case of Halon's razor. But I do see a difference between crazy and stupid... and after reading the laws on bait and switch advertising... there is a whole lot more of the later then the former in the first ad announcing the promotion. There is a reason when the supermarket is running that special on $0.10 gallon water they say "supplies are limited" or give's out rainchecks and it isn't because they are worried Lake Michigan will dry up
I am not retired...I work hard to afford my aviation hobby, but my vacation is somewhat flexible. I do have friends who work at companies with policies like you describe.
I have my own company. If you look at my log book, the vast majority of my flights are extended cross counties.. I have a certain day I want to leave... a certain day I wish to return, and 80+% of the time it's for business reasons. This drove my choice of an airplane. I heavily use my airplane for my business... it's integral to family vacations as well... and frankly I've made a lifestyle decision here. Are airplanes my hobby? Sure... but just like a fellow where auto's are his "hobby" he also uses his car as basic transportation.
Reasonable people can agree to disagree. We don't disagree that this was a bad business choice. We only disagree on the degree.
If we agree a woman is pregnant... can we disagree to the degree?? Instead I think we really have two different issues here.
To me it's business ethics... say what you will do, do what you say. To you it was a crazy promotion at the local grocery store for 5 cent apples. I'm however noticing this store initially saying the supply of apples was unlimited yet they only had 90 apples in stock and no intent to source any above that. That is my issue here... the supply was limited yet representing it wasn't in the initial ads/interviews.
This was a crazy advertised special. Even you thought so, and hesitated to commit to it. In my opinion, this whole situation is very different from "normal" business.
I'm not sure what you mean by "normal business". I don't see how one conducts oneself in business should change with the situation. Also I don't see this as a "crazy advertised special" but alot closer to "stupid advertised special." Advertised being the operative word. More on that at the end.
In your opinion, it's right up there with a legally binding signed contract. In my opinion, it was a crazy promotion and not surprising that it was unsustainable, and I'm not going to cut them out of my will for the mistake.
It's elements of both. On the surface it appeared to be a crazy promotion.... look at the title of this thread. However, the vendor repeatedly said the could handle any demand... that the promotion would last through the month, that they had the sources of the gas to meet the demand. Even the grocery store who runs a "crazy" promotion always has a disclaimer of limited supply. Obviously there was a known limit to the promotion.. Yet no disclosure of any limit... instead saying they wouldn't run out of gas. The lack of the disclaimer for this situation, and the vendor saying this situation would never occur is my issue here.
If we had a signed contract to do work for a given price, and then they screwed me....well, I'd be singing a different tune.
If I'd acted on the claim... so would I. However, do be aware businesses have been sued for false advertising and these cases are very often the focus of BBB complaints and actions from state attorney generals/the FTC. So the lack of signed contract still doesn't allow you to say whatever you want to the public in a business relationship. There is certain specific language that must be included in ad's to protect companies from liability.
At the end of our day, our "difference of opinion" consists of three missing words in the initial promotion: "While supplies last"
That being said.... I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill as I don't believe there was any real malice here and as I earlier stated this is likely a case of Halon's razor. But I do see a difference between crazy and stupid... and after reading the laws on bait and switch advertising... there is a whole lot more of the later then the former in the first ad announcing the promotion. There is a reason when the supermarket is running that special on $0.10 gallon water they say "supplies are limited" or give's out rainchecks and it isn't because they are worried Lake Michigan will dry up
Last edited: