SHED out on bail you think?
I dunno how that works in Utah, but the arraignment is scheduled for Nov 16 according to the media.
Here's some extra background. It's been an interesting case of strange bedfellows. The media caught on to the fact he was on appeal against the usaf over a military reprimand, as part of the cohort of AF officers that refused the covid vax, before the service relaxed its stance on it a year later or so. So the media added that case law angle to the story.
Upon reading that inclusion in the story and finding it loaded, the tinfoils stared flying at work, yet again. Some of the folks I work with who are anti-vax crusaders, immediately start to argue that the whole thing is a conspiracy by "woke" Delta and the the big bad Govt to keep a good man down, by falsifying a narrative of the cockpit encounter as reprisal for his anti-vax kerfuffle with the DoD. It's like the world has lost the collective ability to hold two thoughts at the same time.
The anti-vaxers won't hear anything about anybody in a dispute over the vaccine, as anything but a case of a framed victim in every single attached context. You could be charged with murder and if you had a disagreement over mRNA vaccination at some point with someone, you're 100% being framed for murder because of covid in their eyes.
This stance of course puts them at odds with the other half of their otherwise politically same-sided military peers, who happen to know the personality track record behind the guy in question, well before the anti-vaxers took up that covid hill against the DoD.
What we do know is that DL fired him over the FFDO thing. We also know his history in the usaf as a perennial contrarian, absolutely hated by his peers and subordinates as a middle manager, and just a regular ol' blue falcon, well
before the covid kerfuffles. If you haven't figured it out by now, his callsign means Super Huge Enormous Doosh, which he had well before he even left AD for AFRC (that occurred in 2014). Again, covid reprimands didn't start until fall'20/spring'21.
As to FFDOs, my experience with them is demographics-limited to the ones who are .mil side (whether .mil reservists/.civ airline dual-hatters, or clean separated/retired, I know both kinds). It's not a stellar look tbh. They tend to always gravitate into the same personality profile: overtly authoritarian to a virtue signaling degree (which is to say, gratuitously), outsized gun-enthusiast, all of them in legal fights with the DoD over one thing or another, which they deem defenses against tyranny. Always with passionate appeals about everything is a hill to die on and you're a coward/sycophant if you ever agree with the govt on anything. And lastly, a common denominator walter mitty/"if I'm ever in that situation watch out...." utterance/ideations about their role as FFDOs, usually under the backdrop of military service otherwise characterized by being combat support (aviation writ large), and not close contact arms like infantry or special operators. chip meet shoulder type thing.
Does that make homeboy guilty? Of course not, that's for the courts/jury to decide. But I wholeheartedly disagree this has anything to do with "anti-vaxer persecution" and I wish that trope would die already, it makes working in the military environment right now even more caustic than it already is, given the inflation-adjusted paycuts of present circumstances.