SixPapaCharlie
May the force be with you
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2013
- Messages
- 16,415
- Display Name
Display name:
Sixer
Discuss.
Discuss.
If you were born in 1700, your life expectancy was around 40 years (average)
If you were born around 1900, your life expectancy was around 49 years.
Today, more than 80 years.
A lot of this has to do with the quality and safety of public water systems. (Not to ignore pest control, vaccines, and antibiotics to mention a few other massively beneficial developments). Despite the nostalgia for well water, if you lived downhill from someone who had an outhouse your well could easily be contaminated. And the water might have other objectionable qualities such as iron (not dangerous but stains teeth and hair), sulfur (rotten eggs smell), and no natural presence of flouride.
If you still have all or most of your teeth, thank your public water system for putting a little flouride in it. One of the greatest public health advances ever. The human misery caused by dental caries is rarely discussed but hugely impactful.
But in 1700 and 1900, you could find snake oil salesmen and that hasn't changed. Your liver and kidneys are very efficient at ridding your body of un-needed nutrients and electrolytes - most of the stuff you buy at GNC goes right down the toilet. So does any excess sodium, potassium, etc. "Alkaline" water would simply stimulate the lungs and kidneys to excrete more CO2 (lungs) and acid ions (kidneys) to balance your pH. If the intake of an alkali (or acid for that matter) overcomes the lungs/kidneys ability to compensate you will get very sick, very fast. If you want to see what excess alkaline blood feels like, hyperventilate on purpose for about 30 seconds. You won't like it - and chances are you'll pass out before the 30 seconds are up.
I agree with most of your points, except for the use of the public water system as a means to deliver "flouride" (fluoride rather). It's extremely inefficient, only beneficial to to those with developing teeth, and can result in overdose (tooth spotting) if the kids are brushing with fluoride toothpaste, which they all do these days. I didn't grow up in areas that had fluoridated water supplies, I owe my teeth to the fluoride supplements and toothpaste I used as a kid.
Yes, I know, some people will argue that "the underprivileged kids that don't have access to..." but you know what, if you're so irresponsible as a parent that you can't provide proper dental hygiene to your kids as almost no cost to you, there are bigger issues going on than just tooth decay prevention.
Politicians seem to think it's a good idea. Dentists are across the board on the issue. Water system engineers think it's completely asinine.
For some reason, I'm reminded of "Bulletproof Coffee":
Don't forget your Yak butter.
I agree with most of your points, except for the use of the public water system as a means to deliver "flouride" (fluoride rather). It's extremely inefficient, only beneficial to to those with developing teeth, and can result in overdose (tooth spotting) if the kids are brushing with fluoride toothpaste, which they all do these days. I didn't grow up in areas that had fluoridated water supplies, I owe my teeth to the fluoride supplements and toothpaste I used as a kid.
Yes, I know, some people will argue that "the underprivileged kids that don't have access to..." but you know what, if you're so irresponsible as a parent that you can't provide proper dental hygiene to your kids as almost no cost to you, there are bigger issues going on than just tooth decay prevention.
Politicians seem to think it's a good idea. Dentists are across the board on the issue. Water system engineers think it's completely asinine.
For every person with a minor issue from water fluoridation, there must be hundreds or even thousands who have benefited. All public health measures have exceptions (in terms of individual benefit) but society as a whole benefits immensely from the effort: thankfully politicians have recognized the benefits. Vaccinations are another example where even those who stubbornly refuse to participate benefit from herd immunity: of course when the disease is introduced from an external source (check recent rubeola outbreaks) herd immunity is of no help to those who have opted out.
I suspect dentists varied opinions are driven in part by the lack of business generated when teeth are not riddled with caries (joking here).
Discuss.