I was about to edit my post.
In alternate law, if I recall correctly, yes it does. It has been over 14 years. However, if it went all the way to direct law, or whatever the direct mode is called, there are no automatic stall protections. The airplane can be stalled in Direct law.
Makes me wonder if it degraded all the way to Direct. Very conceivable, in my mind if the computers could not make sense of the inputs they were receiving.
And to answer the question about the 60 knots and the AoA, I think it is entirely plausible that if the computers sensed an unreasonably low speed the AoA inputs could have been ignored.
I think he managed to get it in such a deep stall that both AoA and AS inputs passed the "ignore" threshold function of the computer and it though it had input failures when in reality the inputs were correct to the situation, he was in a deep stall and falling, and since it didn't know what to make of it, it just kept on going.
Will a perceived "failure" of AoA and Pitot inputs cause a reversion to direct law?