5 dead in an RV-10?

There is a huge difference between consent and informed consent. These people had no fricken' clue the danger they were getting into, I guarantee it. Unless he said, "Hey guys, I'm drunk and unlicensed, flying at night is dangerous and I don't have the required night nor simulated instrument training. Wanna go?" then I hold him 100% responsible.

If they didn't have a clue then they didn't do their due diligence. If they wanted his life story and to take his BAC before getting the plane they should have asked. I had a gigabillion questions before I climbed in with a CFI. And I was standing in an FBO looking for a pro. Climbing in the vehicle with a drunk is inexcusable.
 
If they didn't have a clue then they didn't do their due diligence.
True. It was incumbent upon them to brush up on FAA regs at 3 in the morning and ask this guy questions that he surely would have given honest answers to. Makes sense.

If they wanted his life story and to take his BAC before getting the plane they should have asked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

I had a gigabillion questions before I climbed in with a CFI. And I was standing in an FBO looking for a pro. Climbing in the vehicle with a drunk is inexcusable.
A) we don't even know he was drunk; and b) we don't know that they knew. Are you suggesting that someone SHOULD have asked for his BAC? That's absurd. He was the (unlicensed) operator of the aircraft. He's the one who showed reckless disregard for his passenger's safety.
 
Last edited:
I find it interesting that the group we are in, for the most part, amateur aviators want to mitigate every risk. We train, we (generally) practice to be proficient, we insure our property, we insure others property in the event we damage it, we insure our persons and we insure other persons in the event we damage them. We hold ourselves and others in our group to very high standard of personal responsibility. Then, we will give someone not in our group a complete pass. We will even go so far as to punish our group and their generations for any transgression while holding harmless anyone else. The pilot of this plane was clearly responsible for killing himself, but I cant say the passengers had no responsibility. They knew what time it was, if they could count they knew it only had four seats, they knew the weather. Before I ever took the first lesson I knew it would be a bad idea to fly in the wee hours with too many people in bad weather. I am omitting any reference to incapacitation for now since that is unknown. Finally to say the pilots family has any responsibility in this tragedy is wrong and sad.
 
True. It was incumbent upon them to brush up on FAA regs at 3 in the morning and ask this guy questions that he surely would have given honest answers to. Makes sense.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man


A) we don't even know he was drunk; and b) we don't know that they knew. Are you suggesting that someone SHOULD have asked for his BAC? That's absurd. He was the (unlicensed) operator of the aircraft. He's the one who showed reckless disregard for his passenger's safety.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out this was a bad idea.

Like I said, I was totally clueless to general aviation, had seen an ad for flight lessons at a convenience store. I studied up on it for weeks and checked on the CFI before I ever decided to step foot in a light GA plane with my life in someone else's hands.

Not smart on the PAX part and not smart on the pilots part.
 
I find it interesting that the group we are in, for the most part, amateur aviators want to mitigate every risk. We train, we (generally) practice to be proficient, we insure our property, we insure others property in the event we damage it, we insure our persons and we insure other persons in the event we damage them. We hold ourselves and others in our group to very high standard of personal responsibility. Then, we will give someone not in our group a complete pass. We will even go so far as to punish our group and their generations for any transgression while holding harmless anyone else. The pilot of this plane was clearly responsible for killing himself, but I cant say the passengers had no responsibility. They knew what time it was, if they could count they knew it only had four seats, they knew the weather. Before I ever took the first lesson I knew it would be a bad idea to fly in the wee hours with too many people in bad weather. I am omitting any reference to incapacitation for now since that is unknown.

The idea that people who have no involvement in aviation should be making weight and balance judgments is absurd. People pile 5 or 6 people in a 4-seat car all the time; these kids had no reason to believe a plane is any different. And for that matter, how were they to know flying at night was any different than flying during the day. Same goes for the weather. You're asking them to make aviation judgments. Cletus was the pilot; he's the one responsible.

Finally to say the pilots family has any responsibility in this tragedy is wrong and sad.
Nobody has said the pilot's family has any responsibility. His estate has liability. That's a much different story.
 
True. It was incumbent upon them to brush up on FAA regs at 3 in the morning and ask this guy questions that he surely would have given honest answers to. Makes sense.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man


A) we don't even know he was drunk; and b) we don't know that they knew. Are you suggesting that someone SHOULD have asked for his BAC? That's absurd. He was the (unlicensed) operator of the aircraft. He's the one who showed reckless disregard for his passenger's safety.

Why are you letting me know you setup a straw man. You were the one who brought up him telling his life story to them.
 
It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out this was a bad idea.

Like I said, I was totally clueless to general aviation, had seen an ad for flight lessons at a convenience store. I studied up on it for weeks and checked on the CFI before I ever decided to step foot in a light GA plane with my life in someone else's hands.

Not smart on the PAX part and not smart on the pilots part.
I never said it was "smart" on the passengers' part. But to suggest that they should have had a clear and in-depth understanding of the dangers they faced is preposterous. The "PIC" (which I put in quotes in this case for a number of reasons) is responsible for the safety of his passengers. They could have made every bad decision imaginable that night; but the wheels of that airplane weren't leaving the ground unless and until Cletus decided to take his friends flying. He is the one responsible.
 
I never said it was "smart" on the passengers' part. But to suggest that they should have had a clear and in-depth understanding of the dangers they faced is preposterous. The "PIC" (which I put in quotes in this case for a number of reasons) is responsible for the safety of his passengers. They could have made every bad decision imaginable that night; but the wheels of that airplane weren't leaving the ground unless and until Cletus decided to take his friends flying. He is the one responsible.

They weren't leaving the ground that night until they decided to get in the plane with Cletus.
 
The idea that people who have no involvement in aviation should be making weight and balance judgments is absurd. People pile 5 or 6 people in a 4-seat car all the time; these kids had no reason to believe a plane is any different. And for that matter, how were they to know flying at night was any different than flying during the day. Same goes for the weather. You're asking them to make aviation judgments. Cletus was the pilot; he's the one responsible.


Nobody has said the pilot's family has any responsibility. His estate has liability. That's a much different story.

By any chance, Are you an attorney?
 
They weren't leaving the ground that night until they decided to get in the plane with Cletus.
Apparently it's not obvious to you that Cletus was the only one who could even get the engine turning, much less get the wheels off the ground.
 
Oh really? Where did I do that? :rolleyes:

See bold.

There is a huge difference between consent and informed consent. These people had no fricken' clue the danger they were getting into, I guarantee it. Unless he said, "Hey guys, I'm drunk and unlicensed, flying at night is dangerous and I don't have the required night nor simulated instrument training. Wanna go?" then I hold him 100% responsible.
 
Apparently it's not obvious to you that Cletus was the only one who could even get the engine turning, much less get the wheels off the ground.

They didn't have to get in. Did he hold them at gunpoint and force them in the plane?
 
They didn't have to get in. Did he hold them at gunpoint and force them in the plane?
Getting in didn't kill them. It was the whole flying and crashing thing which was the biggest factor.
 
Its relevant in the respect that I don't take a knife to a gun fight. You get paid to argue. I don't, and I am not really good at it anyway.:D
I was kiddin'. No, I'm actually not.
 
In with you Bart, I give the general public more credit. Flying carries more risk than driving, I think everyone knows that. Flying in bad weather is carries more risk, I believe everyone knows that. I think everyone would realize that five is too many with only four seasons belts. I will admit, his family may have to pay for it, but it is shame if they do.
 
Drunk, untrained person flying an aircraft likely overweight and out of balance at night? I beg to differ.


Is there evidence any of that is true? Or are you speculating?

Even if it is true, the chances of crashing aren't 100%.
 
Waylon Boatright , 38
Drayden Sears, 24
Logan Tomberlin, 23
Ethan Hampton, 23
Angel Wade, 20

How did a 38 year old go to school with early 20's kids? Maybe he got left back a couple (more than a couple) of times.
 
Waylon Boatright , 38
Drayden Sears, 24
Logan Tomberlin, 23
Ethan Hampton, 23
Angel Wade, 20

How did a 38 year old go to school with early 20's kids? Maybe he got left back a couple (more than a couple) of times.

It is a small town.....

Everybody knows Everybody....

You can bet those kids knew of or were friends with the pilot.

You can bet they all knew he was a rouge operator.

You can also bet the local coroner will NOT release the tox results...


IMHO......




Time will tell though.
 
It is a small town.....

Everybody knows Everybody....

You can bet those kids knew of or were friends with the pilot.

You can bet they all knew he was a rouge operator.

You can also bet the local coroner will NOT release the tox results...


IMHO......




Time will tell though.

The NTSB will get it
 
The NTSB will get it

A few years ago I would have had no doubt... BUT..

After the recent fatal crash here in Jackson that I witnessed ,that given has been reduced to a maybe....

Long story short.... RV-7 crashed and killed two, 5 hours later two National Park Investigators called and asked for a statement, I met them at the FBO and they filled out pages of forms. I then suggested they visit the tower to ask more questions, I called the tower, got permission, escorted them over, met with the tower controller, who happened to be on duty and watched the crash too...

The investigators point blank asked to hear the tapes.. Tower guy said " pound sand... Get a subpoena" and lead us out of the tower... Knowing what his final words were would have helped us from digging through that bio hazard wreckage looking for clues...

Spend three days assisting the NTSB investigator. One the 4th day she asked to visit the tower and speak with them... Once again I called and got permission to visit the tower... I escorted her over, went up to the cab and after a few minutes of her quizzing them of weather, traffic, pattern and other stuff she needed for her report, she then flat out asked to hear the tapes......

Once again they told her to "pound sand, get a subpoena" .. I honestly thought she was gonna beat the guys ass right then and there.... We were asked to leave and she finally gave in and I drove her back to her car that was parked in my hangar...

She HAD to get the courts involved days later to hear the tapes...:mad2::mad2::mad2:..

The NTSB apparently doesn't have the pull I thought they did...:redface::redface:
 
Last edited:
A few years ago I would have had no doubt... BUT..

After the recent fatal crash here in Jackson that I witnessed ,that given has been reduced to a maybe....

Long story short.... RV-7 crashed and killed two, 5 hours later two National Park Investigators called and asked for a statement, I met them at the FBO and they filled out pages of forms. I then suggested they visit the tower to ask more questions, I called the tower, got permission, escorted them over, met with the tower controller, who happened to be on duty and watched the crash too...

The investigators point blank asked to hear the tapes.. Tower guy said " pound sand... Get a subpoena" and lead out out of the tower... Knowing what his final words were would have helps us prevent digging through that bio hazard wreckage looking for clues...

Spend three days assisting the NTSB investigator. One the 4th day she asked to visit the tower and speak with them... Once again I called and got permission to visit the tower... I escorted her over, went up to the cab and after a few minutes of her quizzing them of weather, traffic, pattern and other stuff she needed for her report, she then flat out asked to hear the tapes......

Once again they told her to "pound sand, get a subpoena" .. I honestly thought she was gonna beat the guys ass right then and there.... We were asked to leave and she finally gave in and I drove her back to her car that was parked in my hangar...

She HAD to get the courts involved days later to hear the tapes...:mad2::mad2::mad2:..

The NTSB apparently doesn't have the pull I thought they did...:redface::redface:

Do they not have liveatc.com?
 
Stupid 'crat power trips like that make me furious. One branch of the govt obstructing the very real need to know of another branch for the benefit of the public. This screams 'union' to me, but I have no idea if there's a union issue, or if it's just CYA writ large.

Either way, it's infuriating to witness.
 
The learning curve with some lessons of life is very steep. The most extreme must be learned from the unfortunate events of others. The very first lesson can be the final exam.
 
Drunk, untrained person flying an aircraft likely overweight and out of balance at night? I beg to differ.

We don't know his blood alcohol yet. He was trained by someone, because my plane is not one to "teach yourself" in. Not a certified pilot, yes. Mine would haul 5- 160 pounders if two were in the right front seat and I loaded 250 lbs of 100LL, cg would be in range with no baggage, and 260 hp cs prop would definitely haul us up at 1200 fpm. Now put three in the back...pitch sensitivity would be a handful. I fly often near my aft limit and am very comfy, but I would not want to exceed it.
 
Last edited:
Unless they were living under a rock, they'd have to know that planes do crash from time to time.
Disingenuous. "Accidents happen" hardly applies to a someone flying without a certificate, at night, likely overloaded and out of balance, and drunk. I mean seriously...
 
Is there evidence any of that is true? Or are you speculating?

Even if it is true, the chances of crashing aren't 100%.
I freely admit I'm speculating as to him being drunk, but I will eat my shoes if he was sober. And I sincerely believe the risk of crashing while flying without a certificate, at night, in poor weather, etc. etc. AND drunk is 100%. Those people were dead the second the wheels left the runway.
 
Stupid 'crat power trips like that make me furious. One branch of the govt obstructing the very real need to know of another branch for the benefit of the public. This screams 'union' to me, but I have no idea if there's a union issue, or if it's just CYA writ large.

Either way, it's infuriating to witness.
I'd guess CYA, and that is BS.
 
We don't know his blood alcohol yet. He was trained by someone, because my plane is not one to "teach yourself" in. Not a certified pilot, yes. Mine would haul 5- 160 pounders if two were in the right front seat and I loaded 250 lbs of 100LL, cg would be in range with no baggage, and 260 hp cs prop would definitely haul us up at 1200 fpm. Now put three in the back...pitch sensitivity would be a handful. I fly often near my aft limit and am very comfy, but I would not want to exceed it.
I say "untrained" to the extent he didn't have a certificate. That we know. My guess is he had someone teach him to land and he "figured the rest out himself". Probably a lot of autopilot. And I'd also be willing to bet the person who taught him whatever he was taught was not a CFI. Hell, they may have been an "unlicensed operator" too. Whatever it was, this whole operation was not on the up and up.
 
Getting in didn't kill them. It was the whole flying and crashing thing which was the biggest factor.
Actually, it was getting in that got them killed. If they had not gotten in, would they be alive today? I'd say probably so. These are adults we are talking about who chose to get in.
 
Disingenuous. "Accidents happen" hardly applies to a someone flying without a certificate, at night, likely overloaded and out of balance, and drunk. I mean seriously...

They were standing there staring at the situation. They knew what they were getting into.
 
I freely admit I'm speculating as to him being drunk, but I will eat my shoes if he was sober. And I sincerely believe the risk of crashing while flying without a certificate, at night, in poor weather, etc. etc. AND drunk is 100%. Those people were dead the second the wheels left the runway.
I'm guessing this isn't the first time he did whatever he did, and he didn't end up dead the first time.
 
Actually, it was getting in that got them killed. If they had not gotten in, would they be alive today? I'd say probably so. These are adults we are talking about who chose to get in.

They were standing there staring at the situation. They knew what they were getting into.
Actually I would be willing to bet that they survived the getting in part. I'm fairly certain it was the non-certificated, intoxicated guy flying the plane into the ground which caused the fatal injuries.
 
I'm guessing this isn't the first time he did whatever he did, and he didn't end up dead the first time.
I doubt it. I think flying drunk at night without a pilot certificate is a once-in-a-lifetime experience. That's my opinion.
 
Maybe student pilots should be required to have the following tattooed on their forehead:

PASSENGER WARNING

This pilot is a student pilot and does not comply with the FAA safety regulations for pilots.
 
Back
Top