Nice museum piece. Or do you fly it and hope or rebuild first?
Is that paint and interior original? I thought most aircraft of that vintage had tiny tail numbers.
The paint does appear to be original (or an original scheme), but it didn't have the full size n-number when it left the factory. It looks like that was added later and the original N-number is still on the vertical stab.Is that paint and interior original? I thought most aircraft of that vintage had tiny tail numbers.
The paint does appear to be original (or an original scheme),
It says 100%original so if it's been repainted, the description is wrong.
It says 100%original so if it's been repainted, the description is wrong.
It says 100%original...
56 years since manufacture......I think if you bought it to fly, you'd want to at least do a tear down inspection first.
This would be a great airplane to go to the Smithsonian as they like to keep things original vice restoration.
Actually, the factory photos do show those.BTW...those wingtip position light reflectors aren't likely 1958 vintage.
Actually, the factory photos do show those.
I'm not sure about the landing light in the wing leading edge though.
The paint colors are ugly enough (and do follow the paint design) to be original. It could have been a customer selection.
I really think (or at least hope) that even Cessna didn't have THAT bad of taste in colors in the 1950s !!!!!
Here's an original scheme from a 1958 sales brochure...my bet is the yellow was added.
Looks original to me, though the 12" fuselage registration marks were probably added later.
Yeah, the colors are ugly. But don't forget that when that airplane was new, otherwise-sane people were driving around in Dodge Custom Royal sedans with three-tone coral, turquoise and black paint jobs ...
De Sotos too!
The paint does appear to be original (or an original scheme), but it didn't have the full size n-number when it left the factory. It looks like that was added later and the original N-number is still on the vertical stab.
With push button transmissions...
That makes sense.
The airplane looked to be in pristine condition... from the outside. I wonder how it would look on inspection. I wonder if it has a current annual? Seems doubtful.
In any case, it's an exceedingly rare example.
So, do we want to start a pool on what it sells for? $10/head, winner takes all.
I guess I should ask...are Barrett-Jackson auction results published? That might be an important qualifier.
The auctions are broadcast live on cable (usually the Velocity and/or Discovery channels). The results are posted on the Barrett-Jackson website as soon as an item sells.
As noted, Barrett-Jackson sells (mostly) top shelf consignments. But, they rarely sell airplanes. The company has, essentially, created an overheated market for American classic cars, muscle cars and street rods. The sale prices at B-J auctions are usually the top of the market for those types of vehicles. The 182 will be an anomaly, a minor hiccup in the days long stream of Mustangs, Camaros, Corvettes, etc., that flow across the auction block.
If one of the one percenter collectors with eclectic tastes wants to one-up a fellow one-percenter who's across the room, the bidding could go through the roof. If, however, the airplane doesn't strike the fancy of one of those deep -pocketed bidders, and there are at least two knowledgeable folks who know what 182s are worth, I'd be surprised if it sold for much more than $100K, or so.
After all, a '58 182 is the aviation equivalent of a '58 Chevy Bel Air. Low mileage, original examples of cars like that tend to bring prices in that range.
The airplane is unique but not rare. IMO, it should bring at least double the price of a nice, older 182. But, this is an auction. If the right folks are in the room, all bets are off.
Mark
The auctions are broadcast live on cable (usually the Velocity and/or Discovery channels). The results are posted on the Barrett-Jackson website as soon as an item sells.
Pilot side rudder pedals look really worn for only 201 hrs TT.