Foreflight renewal approaching, iPad out of support - Is it time to go Android?

Two planes, two mini 6s, both have USB outlets and power cords available if needed. I’ve never had an overheat shutdown in my airplanes. I appreciate the GP functions and appearances are similar to the G3X. I use the Mini for nav to free up the G3X for better things. It’s amazing what iPads and apps can do. I can’t think of anything to be unhappy about. Well, I wish the G3X was as easy to update!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1827.jpeg
    IMG_1827.jpeg
    2.9 MB · Views: 13
For my use case, albeit a hugh wing aircraft with the iPad nonetheless near the windshield and often in the sun, a ventilated powered clip in case solved the overheating.

A bubble airplane at 100 F is going to be a challenge regardless.
 
As a pilot, I am not designed to deal with the hest of a bubble canopy in the desert either.
As a pilot, I am not designed to deal with the cold of an open cockpit in today's single digit temperatures, either. It's sure nice in the summertime, though!

Dana,
who will unbuckle the harness as soon as I regain feeling in my fingers...
 
I still contend that it is a Ford Chevy argument. I too have an EE, real-time software development background although in a much different time on much less stable and lower level operating systems. I’ve been retired going on 9 years. I’ve never developed any software on either platform. If I were doing that I might prefer the Android over the Apple. As a user, however I prefer an Apple. For end users I see it as Ford Chevy.
I guess we agree.
 
Heck with desert heat - have now learned that an iPad will also cease charging below about -15F. Need a heated case.
 
Today, there are SDKs like Xamarin that allow you to develop cross-platform apps.
Which other cross-platform SDKs exist?
Xamarin isn't supported anymore.
They seem to be pushing people to .Net MAUI and C#
I didn't know C# was still a thing!
 
I always go with just the wifi; I'm not paying for another data plan; I'll hotspot off my cellphone when I need to.

You don't need to pay for a data plan if you don't want to. But the WiFi only iPads do not have the built in GPS, only the cellular versions do.

I bought my iPad Mini 6 without a data plan. But later added it, as it was just easier than dealing with hotspoting.
 
As a pilot, I am not designed to deal with the cold of an open cockpit in today's single digit temperatures, either. It's sure nice in the summertime, though!

Dana,
who will unbuckle the harness as soon as I regain feeling in my fingers...

Who the hell is flying in an open cockpit in single digit temps. Hell, I don’t being on the ramp in single digit stuff.
 
Who the hell is flying in an open cockpit in single digit temps. Hell, I don’t being on the ramp in single digit stuff.
Some people do, but I am not one of them. My lower limit is 40°F, and that's a short flight when I'm desperate for my fix.
 
You don't need to pay for a data plan if you don't want to. But the WiFi only iPads do not have the built in GPS, only the cellular versions do.

I bought my iPad Mini 6 without a data plan. But later added it, as it was just easier than dealing with hotspoting.
That was never an issue for me. On the GPS end, I made a decision with the iPad Gen 1 that the extra $100 was better spent on an external puck than cellular and, at least for me, I've been happy with that choice.

On the data side, even in the "early days" using my phone as a hotspot when WiFi wasn't available (or I didn't want to use it) was a one button tap and I probably haven't done that more than a handful of times in the past decade. The only time its had relevance to aviation was in commercial airline terminals with bad WiFi option..
 
On the data side, even in the "early days" using my phone as a hotspot when WiFi wasn't available (or I didn't want to use it) was a one button tap and I probably haven't done that more than a handful of times in the past decade. The only time its had relevance to aviation was in commercial airline terminals with bad WiFi option.
I still use the phone hotspot all the time, especially in places like airline terminals. Public wifi in those kinds of places is notoriously unsecure. And to get weather data at small airports with no internet access.
 
I still use the phone hotspot all the time, especially in places like airline terminals. Public wifi in those kinds of places is notoriously unsecure. And to get weather data at small airports with no internet access.
Yes, that’s one of the “bad” categories.

The last time I was at a small airport without internet access was 2006 :D
 
I'm mostly an Android guy, but I bought an iPad mini a few years ago specifically for aviation stuff. I tried FltPlanGo and Avare and GarminPilot and didn't like any of them. (I didn't know about iFlyEFB at the time.) Everyone else at the flight school I'm affiliated with was using ForeFlight so I just went ahead and got an iPad (and a Sentry). So, yes, peer pressure was involved, but it's been pretty pretty solid.

I've had both Android tablets and iPads overheat, generally in direct sunlight. You can delay it somewhat if you make sure they're not charging at the same time. I now use a mount that has a set of fans built in, and that's worked even in the summer.

And yes, the GPS is generally incorporated into the cell module. All the Apple ones are like that, all the Samsung ones are like that, and all the offbrand Android ones I've worked with have been like that.
 
There is a rumor floating around that boeing (and thus foreflight) is a silent partner to vector landing fee systems. Foreflight tracks information about each flight, including landings. If foreflight corporate is able to upload flight information from devices, and share with Vector, then landing fees would be easy, even if flying in ADSB anonymus mode. Anyone else hearing this rumor, or able to confirm or deny? If true, this would be one reason not to use foreflight.
 
There is a rumor floating around that boeing (and thus foreflight) is a silent partner to vector landing fee systems. Foreflight tracks information about each flight, including landings. If foreflight corporate is able to upload flight information from devices, and share with Vector, then landing fees would be easy, even if flying in ADSB anonymus mode. Anyone else hearing this rumor, or able to confirm or deny? If true, this would be one reason not to use foreflight.
I've heard the rumor. The only thing I have seen might have led to the rumor is, if you are flying under a Foreflight callsign and a charge is incurred, Foreflight will bill your account.

1735141281421.png

That doesn't bother me. Basically, since Foreflight owns the ID, Vector (of whatever organization) is billing Foreflight. Foreflight is just getting reimbursed by the person who incurred the charge.
 
Interesting. How does Vector know to send the overflight user fee to foreflight? Is Vector watching the sky with a radar? Or is Vector watching the ADSB track on foreflight? What if a person is using another EFB, maybe iFlyEFB? Does this EFB also pass thru Vector fees? If not, this may be another reason not to use foreflight.
 
The better question, what legal means does Vector have to collect? Can they place a lien on the aircraft? What happens to those that don't pay?
 
The better question, what legal means does Vector have to collect? Can they place a lien on the aircraft? What happens to those that don't pay?
We don’t know what will happen.

Assuming the charge itself is legit, they can start collection proceedings, affect credit ratings, and ultimately place a lien on property, including but definitely not limited to the aircraft, like any other debt. Worth it? Maybe.
 
Interesting. How does Vector know to send the overflight user fee to foreflight? Is Vector watching the sky with a radar? Or is Vector watching the ADSB track on foreflight? What if a person is using another EFB, maybe iFlyEFB? Does this EFB also pass thru Vector fees? If not, this may be another reason not to use foreflight.
Yes, it’s based on ADS-B. that’s the whole idea behind Vector acting as a collection agency for the airports imposing these fees.

The Foreflight connection - if there is indeed one - is based on the aircraft squawking a ForeFlight call sign. A pilot or aircraft owner with a ForeFlight Performance package can sign up for a ForeFlight call sign. It’s completely optional There are various reasons pilots get one.

They know FFL123 flashing on ADS-B is ForeFlight just like they know UA321 is United Airlines.
 
Very interesting. So if I understand this correctly, a person can be using ADSB anonymous mode, flying over the countryside, and breach some type of imaginary airspace that Vector claims to own, and foreflight will help Vector send an unsuspecting aircraft owner a bill for airspace usage fees. if this is correct, this is rather interesting. Aside from all the questions of legality of this scenario, do other EFB's such as IFly also report aircraft information to Vector, or do we know? If other EFBs don't link with Vector, in my mind this would be a definite motivation to switch away from foreflight, toward EFBs that don't talk to Vector or other aviation fee collection scams.
 
Very interesting. So if I understand this correctly, a person can be using ADSB anonymous mode, flying over the countryside, and breach some type of imaginary airspace that Vector claims to own, and foreflight will help Vector send an unsuspecting aircraft owner a bill for airspace usage fees. if this is correct, ….
Except it’s not correct. Vector has three services:
1. Plane Pass Landing fees billing and collections for airports that contract with them to do so. ADS-B isn’t the only data source. At least one local airport I’m aware of that has a Plane Pass contract also has cameras at each end. I don’t know what triggers them, but a low approach (200’ AGL) doesn’t, regardless of my ADS-B presence there.
2. Plane Pass Overflight - this is a service to an ICAO Flight Information Region and handles overflight billing and collection for the country responsible for that FIR. The US doesn’t participate in that effort. Never had an experience with this.
3. VNOMS. Noise and ops management. Effectively it’s plane pass for noise abatement.
 
Very interesting. So if I understand this correctly, a person can be using ADSB anonymous mode, flying over the countryside, and breach some type of imaginary airspace that Vector claims to own, and foreflight will help Vector send an unsuspecting aircraft owner a bill for airspace usage fees. if this is correct, this is rather interesting. Aside from all the questions of legality of this scenario, do other EFB's such as IFly also report aircraft information to Vector, or do we know? If other EFBs don't link with Vector, in my mind this would be a definite motivation to switch away from foreflight, toward EFBs that don't talk to Vector or other aviation fee collection scams.
I'm not going to defend Vector, etc. but:

I would assume that the people Foreflight is billing is those people that are using Foreflight call signs, not just anybody using Foreflight. Anybody can register with FF for a FFL call sign, it's an attempt at anonymizing your aircraft and travels.

But if you have a FFL call sign and land at an airport that has contracted with Vector to charge landing fees, Vector then has to send a bill somewhere, and with a FFL call sign, the only logical place they can send the bill to is Foreflight. Foreflight will then pass through the charges to you, which seems totally reasonable and appropriate to me (unless they add a service charge like rental cars do with toll roads).
 
The better question, what legal means does Vector have to collect? Can they place a lien on the aircraft? What happens to those that don't pay?

I think you are making a mountain out of a mole hill. Airport operators determine whether or not to charge a landing fee. Some choose to contract one or more third parties to collect those fees, be it an FBO like MillionAir, Signature, or Vector.

Vector happens to use a variety of sources to determine a plane is subject to the fee. Cameras, ADS-B, filed flight planes, the FAA aircraft registry, and other things to determine the aircraft is subject to the airport’s landing fee. Vector then sends a bill to the registered owner.


If Vector is contracted to bill and collect the landing fees at an airport, they have every legal right to do so.

If you have a problem with paying landing fees, that problem exists with the airport operator, not the collections agent.
 
I'm not going to defend Vector, etc. but:

I would assume that the people Foreflight is billing is those people that are using Foreflight call signs, not just anybody using Foreflight. Anybody can register with FF for a FFL call sign, it's an attempt at anonymizing your aircraft and travels.

But if you have a FFL call sign and land at an airport that has contracted with Vector to charge landing fees, Vector then has to send a bill somewhere, and with a FFL call sign, the only logical place they can send the bill to is Foreflight. Foreflight will then pass through the charges to you, which seems totally reasonable and appropriate to me (unless they add a service charge like rental cars do with toll roads).
Kind of like I borrow your car and run up some parking tickets. If you ask me to pay them, you’re the bad guy.
 
I think you are making a mountain out of a mole hill. Airport operators determine whether or not to charge a landing fee. Some choose to contract one or more third parties to collect those fees, be it an FBO like MillionAir, Signature, or Vector.

Vector happens to use a variety of sources to determine a plane is subject to the fee. Cameras, ADS-B, filed flight planes, the FAA aircraft registry, and other things to determine the aircraft is subject to the airport’s landing fee. Vector then sends a bill to the registered owner.


If Vector is contracted to bill and collect the landing fees at an airport, they have every legal right to do so.

If you have a problem with paying landing fees, that problem exists with the airport operator, not the collections agent.

Believe me I understand the concept, and not trying to make anything out of it. I was asking a bonafide question.

What recourse does Vector have to collect? Has anyone just threw away the invoice and went on their merry way? Has Vector sought legal action to collect? I'm genuinely curious.
 
Believe me I understand the concept, and not trying to make anything out of it. I was asking a bonafide question.

What recourse does Vector have to collect? Has anyone just threw away the invoice and went on their merry way? Has Vector sought legal action to collect? I'm genuinely curious.

You can ask them directly and maybe get the most accurate answer or maybe get no answer at all.


I’ve never considering not paying a bill for an expense I legitimately incurred, but I would expect the company has all legal recourse available to any business. In my state, failing to do so can be a misdemeanor criminal act, theft of service, punishable up to 180 days in jail and/or up to $2000 fine.
 
Here’s the deal. A low-level review of what’s going on indicates many airports have been charging landing and FBO usage fees for a long time. And Vector has been in the monitoring and collection business for more than a decade using various overflight identification techniques - visual spotting, cameras, etc. What seems to be happening now is that airports which had no fee structure are adding them and/or beginning to use Vector as well.

A bit of speculation: it’s happening because the ability to track ADS-B makes the service a lot cheaper. So airports which did not use them before are beginning to.

I’m fairly neutral on collection agencies that aren’t predatory and don’t engage in illegal protection practices. And if an EFB is being billed because I chose to use their callsign on a particular flight (I suspect some comments don’t understand how this works), I expect them to pay it an charge me. Just like my parking tickets with your car comment earlier.

Just me, but I think blaming anyone other than the airport charging the fees and hiring a monitoring/collection vendor makes no sense.

On the EFB end, some airports are disclosing their fees, so might as well treat that as part of our flight due diligence. And we’re starting to see comments that Vector is being used. What I wouldn’t mind seeing in an EFB is fees and Vector use highlighted in some way.
 
Believe me I understand the concept, and not trying to make anything out of it. I was asking a bonafide question.

What recourse does Vector have to collect? Has anyone just threw away the invoice and went on their merry way? Has Vector sought legal action to collect? I'm genuinely curious.

On what grounds do you justify not paying a bill for a service you used?
 
On what grounds do you justify not paying a bill for a service you used?
First and foremost would be that such charges were not disclosed at or before the time of the service. That seems to be the primary complaint about Vector, the lack of transparency.
 
May as well close the loop and add the ability to submit the fee to Vector from within ForeFlight via Apple Pay.
If Vector bills Foreflight because I was flying that day squawking FFL1234, I have no problem reimbursing them for what they paid out. But I would not want to see any EFB used as a third party collection hub. If I'm not flying under my Foreflight ID, there's no basis for Vector to charge Foreflight and Vector will just have to send me the bill.
 
First and foremost would be that such charges were not disclosed at or before the time of the service. That seems to be the primary complaint about Vector, the lack of transparency.
That's not a Vector issue. It's an airport/FBO fee disclosure issue. And, I'd bet more an more of these airports are going to do something like this on their websites.
1735232811267.png
 
Heat, the iPad is not designed to deal with the heat of a bubble canopy in the desert. There are (but not all) Android tablets that can handle it. I really like Foreflight, but I don't trust the reliablity my iPad as a tool in the cockpit.
ForeFlight gives you a warning that the iPad is getting hot BEFORE the iPad overheats and shuts down so that you can mitigate this issue.
Which other cross-platform SDKs exist?
Xamarin isn't supported anymore.
Huh... How about that. Sounds like Maui is the new way, but I think their claim of using a single codebase and creating "native apps" on all platforms is somewhat suspect. I mean, sure, it can be done, but I still doubt those apps will be as resource-optimized as the heavyweights like an EFB need.
 
Garmin Pilot running on Samsung tab s9, super sexy. unfortunately, i think it's about as expensive as the ipad. works absolutely great, screen is really really good.

also gp android is now only a few features behind the ipad version
 
Garmin Pilot running on Samsung tab s9, super sexy. unfortunately, i think it's about as expensive as the ipad. works absolutely great, screen is really really good.

also gp android is now only a few features behind the ipad version
It’s much more than a few. Even such basics as loading an instrument approach into the flight plan aren’t there.
 
Last edited:
Huh... How about that. Sounds like Maui is the new way, but I think their claim of using a single codebase and creating "native apps" on all platforms is somewhat suspect. I mean, sure, it can be done, but I still doubt those apps will be as resource-optimized as the heavyweights like an EFB need.
I agree- The xamarin examples all looked like fairly sample things. I doubt Maui is much better.
 
There is a rumor floating around that boeing (and thus foreflight) is a silent partner to vector landing fee systems. Foreflight tracks information about each flight, including landings. If foreflight corporate is able to upload flight information from devices, and share with Vector, then landing fees would be easy, even if flying in ADSB anonymus mode. Anyone else hearing this rumor, or able to confirm or deny? If true, this would be one reason not to use foreflight.
This is NOT true whatsoever.
Interesting. How does Vector know to send the overflight user fee to foreflight? Is Vector watching the sky with a radar? Or is Vector watching the ADSB track on foreflight? What if a person is using another EFB, maybe iFlyEFB? Does this EFB also pass thru Vector fees? If not, this may be another reason not to use foreflight.
It's not the EFB that is the reason for the fee passthrough that can happen. One of ForeFlight's services to their Performance members is the ability to use a callsign, and call yourself "ForeFlight 1234" on the radio. This same thing has been provided by FltPlan.com (now owned by Garmin) for a long time, those callsigns are the ones you hear on the radio as "Dotcom 1234". You can see everyone airborne right now using these callsigns at these links:


As I write this, there's a Gulfstream under Dotcom (N550VR) and seven aircraft under ForeFlight (A Gulfstream, a Premier, a Citation, a TBM, and three PC12s).

Now... Even though these aircraft are operating under ForeFlight/Dotcom callsigns, they are all still squawking their assigned ADS-B code based on their tail number. I was able to see who they all were. So, even if they were landing at Vector-serviced fields, they would be getting billed directly.

For Vector to bill ForeFlight (or fltplan.com or anyone else that isn't the aircraft owner), the aircraft would have to be using a PIA (Privacy ICAO Address). The hex code for aircraft ID that is normally assigned is strictly based on the tail number. For example, N4GA's hex code is A4A886. If they changed the tail number to N4GB, the hex code would be A4A887. So if you know the hex code, you know the tail number.

Since there are sometimes privacy issues with such things, it is possible to get a PIA that you use for a short time (at least 20 days) and then get a different one. There are blocks of fake tail numbers that are used for this. For example, if you look up N429NE, it's registered to "SBS PRGM OFC" at 800 Independence Ave. SW in Washington, DC. That is, FAA headquarters.

*IF* you are using BOTH a ForeFlight callsign *AND* a PIA, the only place Vector can possibly send a bill is to ForeFlight. And ForeFlight will then pay that bill and pass it through by charging you for it. They do not have a business relationship with Vector, they're merely passing through the bill that you incurred.

Very interesting. So if I understand this correctly, a person can be using ADSB anonymous mode, flying over the countryside, and breach some type of imaginary airspace that Vector claims to own, and foreflight will help Vector send an unsuspecting aircraft owner a bill for airspace usage fees. if this is correct, this is rather interesting.
It is not correct.
Aside from all the questions of legality of this scenario, do other EFB's such as IFly also report aircraft information to Vector, or do we know? If other EFBs don't link with Vector, in my mind this would be a definite motivation to switch away from foreflight, toward EFBs that don't talk to Vector or other aviation fee collection scams.
ForeFlight is not "reporting aircraft information to Vector" nor are they "linked with Vector".
 
First and foremost would be that such charges were not disclosed at or before the time of the service. That seems to be the primary complaint about Vector, the lack of transparency.

I've pretty darn sure that if an airport has a landing fee, it is in the A/FD.
 
Back
Top