Why do we switch fuel tanks before landing?

dcat127

dcat127

Pre-Flight
Joined
Jun 30, 2020
Messages
91
Display Name
Display name:
Electro
The Piper checklists I'm familiar with have "fuel on fuller tank" in the before landing checklist. Of course if there is not adequate fuel in the tank you are on you need to switch. But if I have 10 gal in the left and 15 in the right, am I actually improving anything by switching? I feel that switching fuel tanks low to the ground is a somewhat risky endeavor. Should our checklist not say, "fuel on the appropriate tank for landing?"
 
Primarily you want to make sure you have an uninterrupted flow in case of a go around.

You shouldn't be that low when you make this change. This is an "in range" item, not something you do on final.

Of course, it woke me up fast when my wife turned the fuel selector to OFF rather than MAIN on downwind once. Fortunately, the engine restarts quickly when you put fuel back in it. (I won't mention the time I ran a tank dry in the middle of a procedure turn while doing my instrument training).
 
Switch it 10 miles out or not at all. I assume it's not near empty, but if so, why?

You're running on a known fuel source that isn't giving you trouble. Why would you try to switch away from it just to be on a tank with more fuel? They shouldn't be that far off and you've got 10 minutes of flying left? Don't change anything.
 
It might be written that way to make you think about it whike you're not task saturated.
Check whatever tank you're on, make sure you have enough fuel in it for what will happen next (approach, procedure turn, land, go around), switch if you don't thonk you'll have enough.
 
Great question

I think most flight manuals say fullest tank in the checklist. But switching in the pattern or worse, final could cause an engine shutdown due to no fuel. Example - I was flying a Cherokee years ago and switched tanks in the pattern (yup the CFI said to ). On short final I got to do a real engine out procedure. The selector was in the detent but not centered and it had burned through the last bit of fuel in the line until final. That was “interesting “ to say the least.

Now I do like @bflynn said, switch 10ish miles from the airport. I like to plan my bonanza fuel levels to switch when I start out of my cruise when possible, and that’s what the Bonanza society promotes too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdb
If nothing else you're burning fuel from the heavy wing. (Most checklists just advise to use "fullest tank"). If you go around during some task saturation emergency the fuel tank selection is one less task to trip you up while you sort things out, and the all while the W&B is trending to a more neutral condition.

Like many checklist items it's a PRE-landing check list and failure to do it rarely has any real consequences.
 
Last edited:
It's an oversimplification to say that one should switch tanks before landing. And it isn't always the same. It depends on the aircraft and the intent of the checklist writer. Balance and flow characteristics - especially for a balk - play a part, but do not play the same part in all designs.
 
Another point to consider, some aircraft have a minimum fuel in a tank for take off. Probably a good idea to have at least the much in the tank you are using for landing, in case of a go around.
 
With a little planning, switching tanks just before landing should be perfectly avoidable.

I cringe whenever I see pilots reach for the fuel selector handle the millisecond their GPS timer tells them to switch tanks, like their lives depend on immediate action. What's the hurry? In the pecking order of aviate, navigate, communicate, the routine switching between fuel tanks might be a distant fourth even behind communicate (unless you've run a tank dry).

Why is this important? The fuel selector is a mechanical valve, and like all things mechanical, it can break and fail. The valve can get stuck. The handle can break off. The whole assembly could potentially come apart. Does that happen often? Absolutely not, but why take chances and accept exposure to this (admittedly low) risk probability when the severity of the realized risk could be high?

In plain language: switch tanks when you are in gliding distance of an airport, or at least of survivable terrain in case of an emergency landing. With a little planning ahead, you can minimize the number of times you switch between tanks (certainly less often than every 30 minutes) and avoid switching at low altitude. All while arriving at your destination on the fullest tank.

- Martin
 
dcat127 said:
The Piper checklists I'm familiar with have "fuel on fuller tank" in the before landing checklist. Of course if there is not adequate fuel in the tank you are on you need to switch. But if I have 10 gal in the left and 15 in the right, am I actually improving anything by switching? I feel that switching fuel tanks low to the ground is a somewhat risky endeavor. Should our checklist not say, "fuel on the appropriate tank for landing?"
Click to expand...
As long as I'm absolutely certain there's plenty of fuel remaining, I don't switch tanks. Seems to introduce possible failures by messing with the sector.
 
JackL-3J said:
It's an oversimplification to say that one should switch tanks before landing. And it isn't always the same. It depends on the aircraft and the intent of the checklist writer. Balance and flow characteristics - especially for a balk - play a part, but do not play the same part in all designs.
Click to expand...
Yep, my aircraft says put the selector back on main (the aux tanks are approved only for level flight). We had at least one Navion crash when taking off on the tip tanks. I believe there are some Bonanzas that had similar issues.
 
flyingron said:
Yep, my aircraft says put the selector back on main (the aux tanks are approved only for level flight). We had at least one Navion crash when taking off on the tip tanks. I believe there are some Bonanzas that had similar issues.
Click to expand...
The 5- or 6- tank airplanes I’ve flown only allow takeoff and landing on one of them. My understanding is that it has to do, at least in part, with smaller fuel lines that can’t support takeoff power.
 
Martin Pauly said:
With a little planning, switching tanks just before landing should be perfectly avoidable.

I cringe whenever I see pilots reach for the fuel selector handle the millisecond their GPS timer tells them to switch tanks, like their lives depend on immediate action. What's the hurry? In the pecking order of aviate, navigate, communicate, the routine switching between fuel tanks might be a distant fourth even behind communicate (unless you've run a tank dry).

Why is this important? The fuel selector is a mechanical valve, and like all things mechanical, it can break and fail. The valve can get stuck. The handle can break off. The whole assembly could potentially come apart. Does that happen often? Absolutely not, but why take chances and accept exposure to this (admittedly low) risk probability when the severity of the realized risk could be high?

In plain language: switch tanks when you are in gliding distance of an airport, or at least of survivable terrain in case of an emergency landing. With a little planning ahead, you can minimize the number of times you switch between tanks (certainly less often than every 30 minutes) and avoid switching at low altitude. All while arriving at your destination on the fullest tank.

- Martin
Click to expand...

Exactly.

And every 30 minutes is excessive. The GFC-500 autopilot in my plane says maintain the fuel within 10 gallon difference between wings. But that means, first change is about 35 - 45 minutes for takeoff and climb and some cruise to burn 10 gallons. But the next change is 2 hours later (10 GPH), as you start 10 high on that tank, run to equal, then to 10 gallons low.

But if I am going a long trip, I try to have one tank near empty with the majority of the fuel in the other one. That way I can do let down, approach, missed approach, etc without worrying about having to switch again or actually running one dry.
 
Pinecone said:
Another point to consider, some aircraft have a minimum fuel in a tank for take off. Probably a good idea to have at least the much in the tank you are using for landing, in case of a go around.
Click to expand...
I was just about to post essentially the same thing.
 
It will be interesting to read the NTSB report on the Cherokee 6 that just crashed at the Pomona Speedway while attempting to land at Brackett. Based on all the absorbent material spread around the crash site, there was probably plenty of fuel, but not in the selected tank. 4 tanks on that vintage of Cherokee 6. The manual states that if fuel starvation occurs, it could take up to 6 seconds to return fuel to the engine after selecting a tank with fuel.
 
It’s not uncommon to slip the plane during landing, and a tank low on fuel may unport during uncoordinated flight. The fuller tank has less chance of unporting.

Does it matter when both tanks have a lot of fuel? No. But it’s a good habit.
 
MauleSkinner said:
The 5- or 6- tank airplanes I’ve flown only allow takeoff and landing on one of them. My understanding is that it has to do, at least in part, with smaller fuel lines that can’t support takeoff power.
Click to expand...
Flow is one issue, availability in all flight attitudes is another.
 
dcat127 said:
The Piper checklists I'm familiar with have "fuel on fuller tank" in the before landing checklist. Of course if there is not adequate fuel in the tank you are on you need to switch. But if I have 10 gal in the left and 15 in the right, am I actually improving anything by switching? I feel that switching fuel tanks low to the ground is a somewhat risky endeavor. Should our checklist not say, "fuel on the appropriate tank for landing?"
Click to expand...

Piper says tell to use the PROPER TANK on the Warriors and Archers and Proper tank (fullest) on the Arrows.

The APPROACH and Landing checklists provides the operations to be accomplished prior to landing. Where you perform these operations is your discretion. As an example, the approach and landing checklist states the seat backs should be erect. I doubt you are adjusting seat backs low to the ground.

Piper recommends for Archers and Warriors (page 4-22) to use one tank for 1 hour after takeoff; then the other tank for 2 hours; then back to the first tank, which will have 1-1/2 hour of fuel and the second tank will have 1/2 hour of fuel when the tanks were full on take off.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top